medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2013, Number 3

<< Back

Acta Ortop Mex 2013; 27 (3)

Total knee arthroplasty with surgical navigation. Why use it?

Ochoa-Cázares R, Cuadra-Castillo M

Language: Spanish
References: 46
Page: 205-210
PDF size: 278.42 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Total knee arthroplasty is an increasingly common procedure that provides safe and effective pain relief and function restoration in patients with arthritis and osteoarthrosis. The success of the procedure is multifactorial, with implant alignment as one of the major factors involved in a satisfactory and reliable result. Total knee arthroplasty with surgical navigation was designed with the purpose of helping the surgeon improve implant alignment and position while he maintains control over the cuts made and fixation. We reviewed this article on the origins of navigation, the technical details, the advantages and disadvantages, including a glance at future uses and the reason why its use in knee replacement surgery plays such an important role; it has multiple applications and a reproducibility that turn it into an increasingly common, safe and successful procedure.


REFERENCES

  1. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK: Meta-analysis of navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6): 1177-82.

  2. Saragaglia D: Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: 12 years’ experience in Grenoble. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2009; 193(1): 91-104; discussion 104-5.

  3. Bae DK, Song SJ: Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011; 3(4): 259-67.

  4. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S: Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 457: 156-62.

  5. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Digennaro V: Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(4): 765-71.

  6. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C: A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 236-43.

  7. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP: Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(3): 282-8.

  8. Tolk JJ, Koot HW, Janssen RP: Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2012; 25(4): 347-52.

  9. Mombert M, Van Den Daelen L, Gunst P, Missinne L: Navigated total knee arthroplasty: a radiological analysis of 42 randomized cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007; 73(1): 49-54.

  10. Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q: Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(6): 1075-82.

  11. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN: Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplast. 2005; 20: 618-26.

  12. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M: Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86: 682-7.

  13. Zamora LA, Humphreys KJ, Watt AM, Forel D, Cameron AL: Systematic review of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg. 2013; 83(1-2): 22-30.

  14. Bohling U, Schamberger H, Grittner U: Computerized and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2005; 5: 69-75.

  15. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P: Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop. 2003; 27: 366-9.

  16. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W: Computer assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86: 372-7.

  17. Jenny JY, Boeri C: Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6: 217-20.

  18. Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Chung BJ, Cho HJ, Seong SC: Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2010; 17(1): 23-8.

  19. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K: Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8): 1097-106.

  20. Bertsch C, Holz U, Konrad G, Vakili A, Oberst M: Early clinical outcome after navigated total knee arthroplasty. Comparison with conventional implantation in TKA: a controlled and prospective analysis. Article in German. Orthopade. 2007; 36(8): 739-45.

  21. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U: CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective, and randomized study. Unfallchirurg. 2003; 106: 941-8.

  22. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C: Computer assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87: 18-28.

  23. Sparmann J, Wolke B, Czupalla H: Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85: 830-5.

  24. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D: Computer-assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Oper Tech Orthop. 2003; 10: 25-39.

  25. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C: Computer assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 1039.

  26. Victor J, Hoste D: Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428: 131-9.

  27. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA: Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73: 709.

  28. Cheng T, Pan XY, Mao X, Zhang GY, Zhang XL: Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Knee. 2012; 19(4): 237-45.

  29. Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Mont MA: Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11): 2730-5.

  30. Khan M, et al: Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27: 271.

  31. Choong P, Dowsey M, Stoney J: Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 560.

  32. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D: Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 261-9.

  33. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR: Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 14-9.

  34. Schüttrumpf JP, Balcarek P, Sehmisch S, Frosch S, Wachowski MM, Stürmer KM: Navigated cementless total knee arthroplasty - medium-term clinical and radiological results. Open Orthop J. 2012; 6: 160-3.

  35. König DP, Michael JW, Eysel P, Münnich U, Lichtenstein T, Schnurr C: Computer-assisted joint replacement surgery. Financial and clinical impact for a specialized orthopaedic hospital. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009; 147(6): 669-74.

  36. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Leitner F: An 8- to 10-year follow-up of 26 computer-assisted total knee arthroplasties. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(10 Suppl): S121-3.

  37. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, et al: Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7): 1107-12.

  38. Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ: Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(11): 1480-2.

  39. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R: Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 570-8.

  40. Peterlein CD, Schofer MD, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Scherf FG: Clinical outcome and quality of life after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, single-surgeon study and review of the literature. Chir Organi Mov. 2009; 93(3): 115-22.

  41. Ballas R, Philippot R, Cartier JL, Boyer B, Farizon F: Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: impact of the surgeon’s experience on the component placement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133(3): 397-403.

  42. Love GJ, Kinninmonth AW: Training benefits of computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2013; 20(4): 236-41.

  43. Hart R, Janecek M, Cizmár I, Stipcák V, Kucera B, Filan P: Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results. [Article in German] Orthopade. 2006; 35(5): 552-7.

  44. Tria AJ Jr. The evolving role of navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006; 35(7 Suppl): 18-22.

  45. Biasca N, Schneider TO, Bungartz M: Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009; 40(4): 537-63.

  46. Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M: Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee. 2009; 16(1): 22-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com