medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2013; 55 (3)

Validación de un punto de corte para la Escala de Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos, versión abreviada (CESD-7)

Salinas-Rodríguez A, Manrique-Espinoza B, Acosta-Castillo I, Téllez-Rojo MM, Franco-Núñez A, Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, Sosa-Ortiz AL

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 267-274
PDF size: 213.72 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To evaluate the Depression Scale of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies, Brief Version (CESD-7) psychometric properties in Mexican adult population, and validate a cutoff for classifying subjects according to the presence / absence of clinically significant depressive symptoms (CSDS). Materials and methods. Screening cross-sectional study with a subsample of 301 adult residents of the Morelos state in Mexico, originally interviewed for the National Survey of Health and Nutrition 2012. Sensitivity and specificity of the selected cutoff were estimated using as reference the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Results. The cutoff point estimated was CESD-7=9. Using the ICD-10 the sensitivity and specificity were 90.2 and 86%, and ROC was 88%. Using DSM-IV, the values were 80.4, 89.6, and 85%, respectively. Conclusions. The short version of the CESD-7 has good psychometric properties and can be used as a screening test to identify probable cases of subjects with clinically significant depressive symptoms.


REFERENCES

  1. Wancata J, Friedrich F. Depression: a diagnosis aptly used? Psychiatr Danub 2011; 23(4):406-411.

  2. Santor D, Coyne J. Shortening the CES-D to improve its ability to detect cases of depression. Psychol Assess 1997; 9(3):233-243.

  3. González-Forteza C, Solís C, Jiménez A, Hernández I, González-González A, Juárez F, et al. Confiabilidad y validez de la escala de depresión CES-D en un censo de estudiantes de nivel medio superior y superior en la Ciudad de México. Salud Ment 2011;34(1):53-59.

  4. Herrero J, Gracia E. Una Medida Breve de la Sintomatología Depresiva (CESD-7). Salud Ment 2007;30(5):40-46.

  5. Maurer DM. Screening for depression. Am Fam Physician 2012;85(2):139-144.

  6. Mathers C, Fat D, Boerma J. The global burden of disease 2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organzation, 2008. [Consultado 2012 julio 24] Disponible en: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_ disease/2004_report_update/en/index.html.

  7. Williams JW, Noel PH, Cordes JA, Ramirez G, Pignone M. Is this patient clinically depressed? JAMA 2002; 287(9):1160-1170.

  8. U.S.PSTF. Screening for depression in adults: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151(11):784-792.

  9. Radloff L. The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1(3):385-401.

  10. Radloff L, Teri L. Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale with Older Adults. Clin Gerontol 1986; 5(1-2):119-136.

  11. González-Forteza C, Wagner F, Jiménez A. Escala de Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos (CES-D) en México, análisis bibliométrico. Salud Ment 2012;35(1):13-20.

  12. Boyd JH, Weissman MM, Thompson WD, Myers JK. Screening for depression in a community sample. Understanding the discrepancies between depression symptom and diagnostic scales. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39(10):1195-1200.

  13. Irwin M, Artin KH, Oxman MN. Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch Intern Med 1999;159(15):1701-1704.

  14. Clark VA, Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Morgan TM. Analysis of effects of sex and age in response to items on the CES-D scale. Psychiatry Res 1981;5(2):171-181.

  15. Grzywacz JG, Hovey JD, Seligman LD, Arcury TA, Quandt SA. Evaluating Short-Form Versions of the CES-D for Measuring Depressive Symptoms Among Immigrants From Mexico. Hisp J Behav Sci 2006;28(3):404-424.

  16. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med 1994;10(2):77-84.

  17. Tuunainen A, Langer RD, Klauber MR, Kripke DF. Short version of the CES-D (Burnam screen) for depression in reference to the structured psychiatric interview. Psychiatry Res 2001;103(2-3):261-270.

  18. Rueda-Jaimes G, Díaz-Martínez L, López-Camargo M, Campo-Arias A. Validación de una versión abreviada de la Escala para Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos (CES-D) en adultos colombianos. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr 2009;38:513-521.

  19. Obuchowski NA, Zhou XH. Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low. Biostatistics 2002;3(4):477-492.

  20. Li J, Fine J. On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies. Stat Med 2004; 23(16):2537-2350.

  21. Machin D, Say-Beng C, Michael J. Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies. NJ, USA: BMJ Books, 2009.

  22. Zhou X-H, McClish D, Obuchowski N. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010.

  23. WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.

  24. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th. Text revision. Washington, DC.: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

  25. Bech P, Rasmussen N, Olsen L, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W. The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord 2001;66(2-3):159-164.

  26. Olsen LR, Jensen DV, Noerholm V, Martiny K, Bech P. The internal and external validity of the Major Depression Inventory in measuring severity of depressive states. Psychol Med 2003;33(2):351-356.

  27. WHO. WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5). [Consultado 2012 septiembre 7]; Disponible en: http://www.who-5.org/.

  28. Jurado S, Villegas M, Méndez L, Rodríguez F, Loperena V, Varela R. La estandarización del Inventario de Depresión de Beck para los residentes de la ciudad de México. Salud Ment 1998;21(3):26-31.

  29. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988;8(1):77-100.

  30. Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika 1951;16(3):297-334.

  31. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):37-46.

  32. Akhtar-Danesh N, Landeen J. Relation between depression and sociodemographic factors. Int J Ment Health Syst 2007; doi:10.1186/1752- 4458-1-4.

  33. Al-Shammari SA, Al-Subaie A. Prevalence and correlates of depression among Saudi elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999;14(9):739-747.

  34. Bojorquez-Chapela I, Villalobos-Daniel VE, Manrique-Espinoza BS, Téllez-Rojo MM, Salinas-Rodríguez A. Depressive symptoms among poor older adults in Mexico: prevalence and associated factors. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2009;26(1):70-77.

  35. Beck JR, Shultz EK. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110(1):13-20.

  36. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46(5):423-429.

  37. Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Van Limbeek J, Braam AW, De Vries MZ, Van Tilburg W. Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in The Netherlands. Psycholl Med 1997;27(1):231-235.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com