Doubova SV, Espinosa-Alarcón P, Infante C, Aguirre-Hernández R, Rodríguez-Aguilar L, Olivares-Santos R, Pérez-Cuevas R

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 25
Paginas: 257-266
Archivo PDF: 253.38 Kb.

RESUMEN

Objetivo. Adaptar y validar en español de México dos escalas: autoeficacia (EAE) y empoderamiento (EE) durante el climaterio. Material y métodos. El estudio se realizó de febrero a julio de 2011, en dos clínicas de medicina familiar en la Ciudad de México. Adaptación a través de pruebas piloto para comprensión lingüística; validación de constructo mediante análisis de factores con factorización del eje principal y rotación oblimin; estimación de la consistencia interna mediante alfa de Cronbach (AC). Resultados. Participaron 380 mujeres de 45 a 59 años. EAE tenía 16 reactivos con cuatro factores: participación en la relación médico-paciente; control sobre salud mental y cambios sexuales; riesgo de morir de cáncer y otros riesgos de salud, que explicaron 39.8% de variabilidad; AC= 0.84. EE: ocho reactivos con un factor que explicó 47.1% de variabilidad; AC= 0.83. Conclusión. Ambas escalas poseen características psicométricas aceptables para utilizarlas en intervenciones para mejorar el autocuidado de la salud durante el climaterio.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Rosano GM, Vitale C, Marazzi G, Volterrani M. Menopause and cardiovascular disease: the evidence. Climacteric 2007;10 Supl. 1:19-24.

2. Royer M, Castelo-Branco C, Blumel JE, Chedraui PA, Danckers L, Bencosme A et al. The US National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III): prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal Latin American women. Climacteric 2007;10:164-170.

3. Flores-Huerta S, Acosta-Cázares B, Rendón-Macias ME, Klunder-Klunder M, Gutiérrez-Trujillo G. ENCOPREVENIMSS 2004;5. Consumo de alimentos saludables o con riesgo para la salud. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2006;44 Supl. 1:S63-S78.

4. Acosta-Cázares B, Arando-Álvarez JG, Reyes-Morales H. ENCOPREVENIMSS 2004;6. Patrones de actividad física de la mujer y del hombre. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2006;44 Supl. 1: S79-S86.

5. Doubova SV, Flores-Hernández S, Rodriguez-Aguilar L, Pérez-Cuevas R. Quality of care and health related quality of life of climacteric stage women cared for in family medicine clinics. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:20.

6. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,1986.

7. Wood R, Bandura A. Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989;56:407-415.

8. Spence JC, Blanchard CM, Clark M, Plotnikoff RC, Storey KE, McCargar L. The role of self-efficacy in explaining gender differences in physical activity among adolescents: a multilevel analysis. J Phys Act Health 2010;7:176-183.

9. Bruening M, Kubik MY, Kenyon D, Davey C, Story M. Perceived barriers mediate the association between self-efficacy and fruit and vegetable consumption among students attending alternative high schools. J Am Diet Assoc 2010;110:1542-1546.

10. Warren-Findlow J, Seymour RB, Brunner Huber LR. The association between self-efficacy and hypertension self-care activities among African American adults. J Community Health 2012;37:15-24.

11. Dutton GR, Tan F, Provost BC, Sorenson JL, Allen B, Smith D. Relationship between self-efficacy and physical activity among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Behav Med 2009;32:270-277.

12. Aljasem L, Peyrot M, Wissow L, Rubin R. The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2001; 27:393-404.

13. Reece S M, Harkless G. Perimenopausal health self-efficacy among Hispanic Caribbean and non-Hispanic white women. Health Care Women Int 2006;27:223-237.

14. Lau DH. Patient empowerment-a patient-centered approach to improve care. Hong Kong Med J 2002;8:372-374.

15. Reece S M, Harkless G. Testing of the PHS-ES: A measure of perimenopausal health self-efficacy. J Nurs Meas 2002;10:15-26.

16. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Gruppen LD, Funnell MM, Oh MS. The diabetes empowerment scale-short form (DES-SF). Diabetes Care 2003;26:1641-1643.

17. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Fitzgerald JT, Marrero DG. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale: A measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care 2000;23:739-743.

18. Chen MF, Wang RH, Cheng CP, Chin CC, Stocker J, Tang SM, Chen SW. Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale: development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version. J Adv Nurs 2011;67:204-214.

19. Doubova SV, Espinosa-Alarcón P, Flores-Hernández S, Infante C, Pérez-Cuevas R. Integrative health care model for climacteric stage women: Design of the intervention. BMC Women’s Health 2011;11:6.

20. Worthington R, Whittaker T. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns Psychol 2006;34:806-838.

21. Utian WH. Psychosocial and socioeconomic burden of vasomotor symptoms in menopause: a comprehensive review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:47.

22. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 2005;10:1-10.

23. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5a edición. Boston. Pearson Education, 2007.

24. Graham J. Congeneric and (Essentially) Tau-Equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educ Psychol Meas 2006;66:930-944.

25. Infante C, Schlaepfer L. La pobreza en México y el acceso a los servicios de salud. Acta Sociol 1996;17:39-60.