medigraphic.com

2010, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hosp Jua Mex 2010; 77 (3)

Manejo de heridas infectadas con apósito de cloruro de diaquilcarbamilo vs. manejo convencional en el Hospital Juárez de México

López MH, Pardo CR, Miramontes AC, López ZC

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 157-162
PDF size: 222.14 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The development of a wound infection depends on the complex interplay of many factors. Infections of the surgical wound are one of the most common complications in hospitalized patients and are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The delay in recovery and subsequent increased length of hospital stay also has economic consequences. The new management of wound infections indicates that the wound bed must be in proper conditions to initiate the healing process. The use of a bacteria binding wound dressing with hydrophobic coating with a fatty acid derivative (dialkylcarbamoyl chloride, DACC) is a new treatment for patients with wound infection. When bacteria or other micro-organisms come into contact with these wound dressings in a moist environment, they are bound to the dressing surface and are removed from the wound when dressing is changed.


REFERENCES

  1. Primer Consenso Mexicano en Prevención de Infecciones de sitio quirúrgico. AMCG 2008, p. 2-9.

  2. Schawrtz. Principios de Cirugía. 8a. Ed. México: Editorial McGraw-Hill; 2007, p. 473-90.

  3. Townsend CM. Sabiston. Tratado de Patología Quirúrgica. 16a. Ed. Mexico. D.F.: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2003, p. 179-94.

  4. Durlach RA, Freuler CB. El riesgo de infección en el sitio quirúrgico. BEHA 2000; 12-17.

  5. Morayta-Ramírez A, Granados-Galván EM, Pérez-Peláez GC, Domínguez-Viveros W. Incidencia de infecciones nosocomiales en la coordinación de pediatría del CMN “20 de Noviembre”. Revista de Enfermedades Infecciosas en Pediatría 2006; 19: 71-8.

  6. Barrios-Casarrubias A, Ramírez-Franco A, Rodríguez-Quebrado MG. Frecuencia de infecciones nosocomiales y la resistencia de las bacterias de heridas quirúrgicas de dos hospitales de salud de Chilpancingo, Guerrero. Rev Mex Patol Clin 2007; 32: 123.

  7. Petherick ES, Dalton JE, Moore PJ, Cullum N. Methods for identifying surgical wound infection alter discharge from hospital: a systematic review, BMC Inf Dis 2006; 6: 170.

  8. Nichols RL. Preventing surgical site infections: A surgeons Perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7: 220-4.

  9. Gordon Dow, et al. Infection in chronic wounds: controversies in diagnosis and treatment. Moncton New Brunswick Canada. Ostomy/Wound Management 1999; 45(8): 23-40.

  10. Carstens JH. The requirements of modern surgery. JAMA 2001; 286: 2072.

  11. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, et al. Guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection, infection control and hospital epidemiology 1999; 250-78.

  12. Hallern BV, Lang F. Has Cutisorb Sorbact proved its practical value as an antibacterial dressing? 2005 by Verlag für Medizinische Publikationen.

  13. Raahave D. Wound contamination correlates with post surgical infection rates; a new assement technique. In: Wadstrom T, et al. (eds.). Pathogenesis of wound and biomaterial associated infections. London: Springer Verlag; 1990, p. 525-32.

  14. Culver D: Surgical wound infections rates by wound class, operative procedures an patient risk index. Am J Med 1991: 152s-157s.

  15. Cruse P. Wound Infection surveillance. Rev Infect Dis 1981; 4(3): 734-7.

  16. Norma Oficial Mexicana de Emergencia NOM-EM-002-SSA2- 2005, para la vigilancia epidemiológica, prevención y control de las infecciones nosocomiales.

  17. A new hidrophobized wound dressing in the treatment of infected wounds Departament of infectious Diseases, Uppsala University Hospital. USA: Uppsala Sweden; 1986.

  18. Kammerlander G, et al. Non-medicated wound dressing as an antimicrobial alternative in wound management; 2006 by Akademie für.

  19. Haptom S. An evaluation of the efficacy of cutimed sorbact in different types of non-healing wounds. 2007 by Wounds UK.

  20. Hallern BV, Doerk, AVD. Cutisorb Sorbact-Nonpharmacologic antibacterial therapy in traumatology and surgery. 2004 by Verlag für Medizinische Publikationen.

  21. Claesson et al. A promising alternative in the treatment of dermal fungal infections. 2004 by Verlag für Medizinische Publikationen.

  22. Hallern BV, Doerk MR, AVD. Weth. Removal of wound bacteria from infected and colonized wounds with Cutisorb Sorbact. 2004 by Verlag für Medizinische Publikationen.

  23. Wadström LT. A new antibacterial wound dressing without chemically active agent for the care of infected wounds. 2005 by Verlag für Medizinische Publikationen.

  24. Altmeyer, et al. Infection of the chronic wound: Superficial Hidrophobicity of bacteria. Departament of Medical Microbiology, Sweden Wound Healing and Skin Phisiology. (Eds). Springer Verfag Berlin: Heidelberg; 1995, p. S-223-62.

  25. Majno G. The Healing Hand: Man and Wound in the Ancient World. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press; 1982.

  26. Ladin D. Understanding dressings in wound healing: State of the Art. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 1998; 25: 433-41.

  27. Van Rijwijk L. The Language of wounds. In: Krasner D, Kane D. (eds.). Chronic Wound Care. 2nd. Ed. Wayne, PA: Health Management Publications; 1997, p. 5-8.

  28. Belda FJ, Aguilera L, García de la Asunción J, Alberti J, Vicente R, Ferrándiz L, et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection. JAMA 2005; 294: 2035-42.

  29. Acosta GS. Prevención de la infección en el sitio quirúrgico. Revista del ITAS 2005: 7(1): 34-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com