Zerón-Gutiérrez LE, Lifshitz A, Ramiro HM, Abreu-Hernández LF, Reyes-Lagunes I

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 645-650
PDF size: 46.21 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The structure of the change process on medical professionalization has not being studied enough. The physicians make aware the necessity of changing their medical practice that also affect their personal life. A change need to plan, evaluate possibilities and resources with efficacy and outlining competencies. The aim is to contribute in the design of educational strategies that promotes the professional change, understanding it, as an evolution; we describe a theoretical-schematic model based on five consecutive ordained scopes: background, intentions, to plan and take decisions, to carry out and achievement the goal.

REFERENCES

1. Mazmanian RB, Desch CE, Johnson RE. Theory and research for the development of continuing education in the health professions. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1990;10(1): 349-365.

2. Campos MA, Varela R. Prospectiva social y revolución científico- tecnológica. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; 1992.

3. Fox RD. New research agendas for CME: organizing principles for the study of self-directed curricula for change. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1991;11(2):155-167.

4. Fox RD. Lessons from the change study: a case for collaborative research in continuing medical education. Teach Learn Med 1990;2(3):126-129.

5. Fox RD, Mazmanian PE, Putnam RW. Changing and learning in the lives of physicians. New York: Praeger Publishers; 1989.

6. Nowlen PM. A new approach to continuing education for bussiness and the professions. New York: Macmillan; 1988.

7. Gagne R. The conditions of learning. Treanning applications. Orlando Florida, USA: ASTD; 1996.

8. Infante-Castañeda C. Bases para el estudio de la interacción familia-redes sociales-uso de servicios de salud. Salud Publica Mex 1988;30(2):175-196.

9. Bennis WG, Dean BK, Chin R. The planning of change. Fourth edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1985.

10. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass, USA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

11. Lara-Rosano F. Metodología para la planeación de sistemas: un enfoque prospectivo. Cuaderno de Planeación Universitaria 1990;4(2):38-67.

12. O’Neil HF, Drilling M, editores. Motivation: theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Laurence Erlbaum Associated Publishers; 1994.

13. Castañeda-Figueiras S. Evaluando y fomentando el desarrollo cognitivo y el aprendizaje completo. Psicología desde el Caribe. Universidad del Norte 2004(13):109- 143. Disponible en http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/ index.php/psicologia/article/viewFile/1775/1155

14. Ausubel P. Adquisición y retención del conocimiento: una perspectiva cognitiva. España: Paidós; 2002. p. 233-280.

15. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company Stanford University; 1997.

16. Kerlinger FN. Foundations of behavioral research. New York, USA: Harcourt College Publishers; 1999. p. 890.

17. Knowles M. Self directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. Chicago, USA: Chicago Association Press; 1980.

18. Thomas WI. Situations defined as real are real in their consequences. En: Stone GP, editor. Social psychology through symbolic interactionism. New York, USA: Xerox; 1970.

19. Zimmerman B. Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers; 1992.

20. Sternberg RJ, editor. The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives. London: Cambridge University Press; 1996.

21. Woolfolk A. Psicología educativa. Tercera edición. México: Prentice-Hall; 1990.

22. Parker FW, Mazmanian PE. Commitments, learning contracts, and seminars in Hospital CME: change in knowledge and behavior. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1992;12(1):49-63.