medigraphic.com

2012, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2012; 50 (6)

The imprint cytology: a tool diagnosis in the operating room

Gómez-Macías GS, Barboza-Quintana O, Segura-Luna JJ, Miranda-Maldonado I, Barbosa-Quintana Á, Ancer-Rodríguez J, Flores-Gutiérrez JP, Garza-Guajardo R

Language: Spanish
References: 60
Page: 599-608
PDF size: 233.94 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: since 1929, the imprint cytology has a great value in the transoperatory as a diagnostic tool and in some cases as an alternate method.
Methods: during two years period, 416 transoperatory specimens and 384 frozen sections were performed in the Pathology and Cytopathology Department of the University Hospital, “Dr. José E. Gonzalez”. Diagnoses were recorded and compared both methods with the final diagnosis given at definitive histological sections. The results were evaluated and p statistics was performed.
Results: nine of 416 patients (2.2 %) were incorrectly diagnosed by cytology, and 8 of 384 (2.1 %) by frozen section. The diagnostic accuracy for the imprint cytology was 97.8 % and 97.9 % for frozen section. Six of the 416 cases (1.4 %) were misdiagnosed by imprints and frozen sections; the percentage success was 98.5 % using both methods together. The p was statistically significant (0.0005).
Conclusions: the transoperatory cytology is a fast, easy and inexpensive. It provides morphological detail on intact cells and without the freezing artifacts, so its use as an adjunct to the frozen method is of great value.


REFERENCES

  1. Dudgeon LS, Patrick V. A new method for the rapid microscopic diagnosis of tumors: with an account of 200 cases so examined. Br J Surg 1927;15(58):250-261.

  2. Dudgeon LS, Barret NR. The examination of fresh tissues by the wet-film method. Br J Surg 1934;22(85):4-22.

  3. Pickren JW, Burke EM. Adjuvant cytology to frozen sections. Acta Cytol 1963;7:164-167.

  4. McMenemey WH. An appraisal of smear diagnosis in neurosurgery. Am J Clin Pathol 1960;33:471.

  5. Mavec P. Cytologic diagnosis from tumor tissue using the “quick method” during operation. Acta Cytol 1967;11(3):229- 230.

  6. Aust R, Stahle J, Stenkvist B. The imprint method for the cytodiagnosis of lymphadenopathies and of tumors of the head and neck. Acta Cytol 1971;15(2):123-127.

  7. Silverberg SG. Imprints in the intraoperative evaluation of parathyroid disease. Arch Pathol 1975;99(7):375-378.

  8. Godwin JT. Rapid cytologic diagnosis of surgical specimens. Acta Cytol 1976;20(2):111-115.

  9. Bloustein PA, Silverberg SG. Rapid cytologic examination of surgical specimens. Pathol Annu 1977;12(Pt 2):251- 278.

  10. Burger PC, Vogel FS. Frozen section interpretation in surgical neuropathology. I. Intracraneal lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 1977;1:323-347.

  11. Helpap B, Tschubel K. The significance of the imprint cytology in breast biopsy diagnosis. Acta Cytol 1978;22(3):133-137.

  12. Abrahams C. The “scrimp” technique. A method for the rapid diagnosis of surgical pathology specimens. Histopathology 1978;2(4):255-266.

  13. Suen KC, Wood WS, Syed AA, Quenville NF, Clement PB. Role of imprint cytology in intraoperative diagnosis: value and limitations. J Clin Pathol 1978;31(4):328-337. Disponible en http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1145270/

  14. Owings RM. Rapid cytologic examination of surgical specimens: a valuable technique in the surgical pathology laboratory. Hum Pathol 1984;15(7):605-614.

  15. Shidham VB, Dravid NV, Grover S, Kher AV. Role of scrape cytology in rapid intraoperative diagnosis. Value and limitations. Acta Cytol 1984;28(4):477-482.

  16. Wilkerson JA. Intraoperative cytology of lymph nodes and lymphoid lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 1985;1(1):46-52.

  17. Ghandur-Mnaymneh L, Paz J. The use of touch preparations (tissue imprints) in the rapid intraoperative diagnosis of metastatic lymph node disease in cancer staging procedures. Cancer 1985;56(2):339-344.

  18. Szczepanik E. Intraoperative cytology of tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1986;2(3):236-240.

  19. Garza GR, Barboza QO, Ancer RJ. Citología por impronta en el diagnóstico transoperatorio de los tumores del sistema nervioso central. Patologia 1995;33:163-166.

  20. Khalid A, Haque A. Touch impression cytology versus frozen section as intraoperative consultation diagnosis. Int J Pathol Dec 2004;2(2):63-70.

  21. Scucchi LF, Di Stefano D, Cosentino L, Vecchione A. Value of cytology as an adjunctive intraoperative diagnostic method. An audit of 2,250 consecutive cases. Acta Cytol 1997;41(5):1489-1496.

  22. Scopa CD, Melachrinou M, Apessou D, Bonikos D. Tissue imprints in surgical pathology: a rapid intraoperative diagnostic aid. Diagn Cytopathol 1990;6(1):5-8.

  23. Guarda LA. Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis: evaluation of 370 consecutive intraoperative cytologies. Diagn Cytopathol 1990;6(4):235-242.

  24. Mair S, Lash RH, Suskin D, Mendelsohn G. Intraoperative surgical specimen evaluation: frozen section analysis, cytologic examination, or both? A comparative study of 206 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1991;96(1):8-14.

  25. White VA, Trotter MJ. Intraoperative consultation/final diagnosis correlation: relationship to tissue type and pathologic process. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132(1):29- 36.

  26. Volchenko NN, Gladunova ZD, Slavnova EN, Ermolaeva AG, Mel’nikova VIu. Capabilities of cytological assay in the detection of metastatic lesions of the lymph nodes. Klin Lab Diagn 2009;(12):39-43.

  27. Langer I, Guller U, Berclaz G, Koechli OR, Moch H, Schaer G; et al. Swiss Multicenter Study Group Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer. Accuracy of frozen section of sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective analysis of 659 breast cancer patients of the Swiss multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;113(1):129-136. Epub 2008 Feb 23.

  28. Mangia A, Chiriatti A, Chiarappa P, Incalza MA, Antonaci G, Pilato B, et al. Touch imprint cytology in tumor tissue banks for the confirmation of neoplastic cellularity and for DNA extraction. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132(6): 974-978.

  29. Holaday WJ, Azor D. Ten thousand consecutive frozen sections. Am J Clin Pathol 1974;61(6):769-777.

  30. Lessells AM, Simpson JG. A retrospective analysis of the accuracy of immediate frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology. Br J Surg 1976;63(4):327-329.

  31. Czerniak B, Rosai J. Role of cytology in intraoperative diagnosis. A practical guide. Pathol Annu 1995;(30 Pt 2):83-102.

  32. Creager AJ, Shaw JA, Young PR, Geisinger KR. Intraoperative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation. A community hospital experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126(7):846-848.

  33. Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5(3):220-226.

  34. Ku NN, Cox CE, Reintgen DS, Greenberg HM, Nicosia SV. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens. Acta Cytol 1991;35 (4):417-421.

  35. Cox CE, Hyacinthe M, González RJ, Lyman G, Reintgen D, Ku NN, et al. Cytologic evaluation of lumpectomy margins in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4(8):644-649.

  36. Varikatt W, Dexter M, Mahajan H, Murali R, Ng T. Usefulness of smears in intraoperative diagnosis of newly described entities of CNS. Neuropathology 2009; 29(6):641-648. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

  37. Marshall LF, Adams H, Doyle D, Graham DI. The histological accuracy of the smear technique for neurosurgical biopsies. J Neurosurg 1973;39(1):82-88.

  38. Berkeley BB, Adams JH, Doyle D, Graham DI, Harper CG. The smear technique in the diagnosis of neurosurgical biopsies. N Z Med J 1978;8(603):12-15.

  39. D’Halluin F, Tas P, Rouquette S, Bendavid C, Foucher F, Meshba H, et al. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures. Breast 2009;18(4):248-253. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

  40. Burger PC. Use of cytological preparations in the frozen section diagnosis of central nervous system neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1985;9(5):344-354.

  41. Martínez AJ, Pollack I, Hall WA, Lunsford LD. Touch preparations in the rapid intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. A comparison with frozen sections and paraffin-embedded sections. Modern Pathol 1988;1 (5):378-384.

  42. Torres LF, Collaco LM. Smear technique for the intraoperative examination of nervous system lesions. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(1):34-39.

  43. Burger PC, Nelson JS. Stereotactic brain biopsies: specimen preparation and evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121(5):477-548.

  44. Firlik KS, Martínez AJ, Lunsford LD. Use of cytological preparations for the intraoperative diagnosis of stereotactically obtained brain biopsies: a 19-year experience and survey of neuropathologists. J Neurosurg 1999;91(3):454-458.

  45. Di Stefano D, Scucchi LF, Cosentino L, Bosman C, Vecchione A. Intraoperative diagnosis of nervous system lesions. Acta Cytol 1998;42(2):346-356.

  46. Roessler K, Dietrich W, Kitz K. High diagnostic accuracy of cytologic smears of central nervous system tumors. A 15- year experience based on 4,172 patients. Acta Cytol 2002; 46(4):667-674.

  47. Brommeland T, Lindal S, Straume B, Dahl IL, Hennig R. Does imprint cytology of brain tumors improve intraoperative diagnoses? Acta Neurol Scand 2003;108(3): 153-156.

  48. Naniki H, Hardman JM, Yang H. The central nervous system. En: Silverberg SG, DeLellis RA, Frable WJ, editores. Principles and practice of surgical pathology and cytopathology. Third edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. p. 2905- 3036.

  49. Creager AJ, Geisinger KR, Shiver SA, Perrier ND, Shen P, Shaw JA, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic breast carcinoma by imprint cytology. Mod Pathol 2002;15(11):1140-1147.

  50. Gupta PK, Baloch ZW. Intraoperative and on-site cytopathology consultation: utilization, limitations, and value. Semin Diagn Pathol 2002;19(4):227-236.

  51. Kane JM 3rd, Edge SB, Winston JS, Watroba N, Hurd TC. Intraoperative pathologic evaluation of a breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy as a determinant for synchronous axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8(4):361-367.

  52. Hunt JL, Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Sentinel lymph node evaluation for tumor metastasis. Semin Diagn Pathol 2002;19 (4):263-277.

  53. Salem AA, Douglas-Jones AG, Sweetland HM, Mansel RE. Intraoperative evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes using touch imprint cytology and immunohistochemistry: I. Protocol of rapid immunostaining of touch imprints. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29(1):25-28.

  54. Munakata S, Aihara T, Morino H, Takatsuka Y. Application of immunofluorescence for intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003;98(8):1562-1568.

  55. Belleannee G, Verdebout J, Feoli F, Trouette H, de Mascarel A, Verhest A. Role of cytology and frozen sections in the intraoperative examination of the thyroid: comparison of two experiences. Clin Exp Pathol 1999;47(6):273-277.

  56. Basolo F, Baloch ZW, Baldanzi A, Miccoli P, LiVolsi VA. Usefulness of ultrafast Papanicolaou-stained scrape preparations in intraoperative management of thyroid lesions. Mod Pathol 1999;12(6):653-657.

  57. Tworek JA, Giordiano TJ, Michael CW. Comparison of intraoperative cytology with frozen sections in the diagnosis of thyroid lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 1998;110(4):456-461.

  58. Taneri F, Poyraz A, Salman B, Tekin E, Akyuerek N, Bayram O, et al. Using imprint and frozen section in determining the surgical strategies for thyroid pathologies. Endocrine Regul 2001;35(2):71-74.

  59. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Intraoperative assessment of thyroid and parathyroid lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol 2002;19(4): 219-226.

  60. Shidham VB, Asma Z, Rao RN, Chavan A, Machhi J, Almagro U, et al. Intraoperative cytology increases the diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections for the confirmation of various tissues in the parathyroid region. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 118(6):895-902.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com