Barriga FP, Pomposo EMA, García DG, Monares ZE, Montes de Oca SMA, Poblano MM, Aguirre SJ, Franco GJ

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 77-82
PDF size: 83.11 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Severe sepsis and septic shock affect millions of people worldwide each year and are responsible for a large number of deaths each year. Hemodynamic deterioration with the development of tissue hypoperfusion, which is the main factor in the development of multiple organ failure and death in consequence. The goal of treatment of septic shock is cardiovascular tissue perfusion and cellular oxygenation safe restoration disoxia avoid. Optimizing shock index during resuscitation may be associated with improvement in systemic tissue perfusion.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of treatment on mortality of septic shock with shock index guidance.
Material and methods: A prospective, randomized, longitudinal patients with septic shock requiring hemodynamic advanced monitoring with pulmonary artery catheter for continuous cardiac output. All variables are optimized shock index hemodynamic guided to a target with a value ‹ 0.9.
Results: A total of 79 patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different demographic. Were divided into two groups based on the treatment. Group 1: patients with shock index (n = 37) with the optimization of shock index versus Group 2: patients with conventional treatment (n = 42). Mortality for the group resuscitated with shock index was 29.7 versus 66.6% in the conventional group (p ‹ 0.05). Overall mortality was 49.4% similar to that reported in the literature.
Conclusions: The intangible cultural heritage is one of the best ways to evaluate the hemodynamics of the circulatory system and its optimization is associated with improved hemodynamic performance and significantly reduced mortality at 28 days.

REFERENCES

1. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992;20:864-874.

2. Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:17-60.

3. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Grupo 2stad, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368-1377.

4. Vincent JL. The cardiovascular management of sepsis. Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Germany, Spinger 2008.

5. Sunagawa K, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Optimal arterial resistance for the maximal stroke work studied in isolated canine left ventricle. Circ Res 1985;56:586-595.

6. Olakunle Akiboboye. Assessment and clinical applications of myocardial efficiency. Heart Metab 2008; 39: 10-13.

7. Chantler PD, Lakatta EG, Najjar SS. Arterial-ventricular coupling: mechanistic insights into cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise. J Appl Physiol 2008;105:1342-1351.

8. Antonini-Canterin F, Enache R, Popescu BA, Popescu AC, Ginghina C, Leiballi E, et al. Prognostic value of ventricular-arterial coupling and Btype natriuretic peptide in patients after myocardial infarction. A five year follow-up study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:1239-1245.

9. Hoeft A, Sonntag H, Stephan H. Validation of myocardial oxygen demand indices in patients awake and during anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1991;75:49-56.

10. Fox JM, Maurer MS. Ventriculovascular coupling in systolic and diastolic heart failure. Current Heart Failure Reports 2005;2:204-211.

11. Shayn MR, Norris PR, Kilgo PD, et al. Validation of stroke work and ventriculo blood coupling as markers of cardiovascular performance during resuscitation. J Trauma 2006;60:930-935.

12. Shayn MR, Kincaid EH, Russell HM. Selective management of cardiovascular dysfunction in posttraumatic SIRS and sepsis. SHOCK 2005;23(3):202-208.

13. Chang MC, Martin RS, Scherer LA. Improving ventricular-arterial coupling during resuscitation from shock: Effects on cardiovascular function and systemic perfusion. J Trauma 2002;53:679-685.

14. Chang MC, Sheppard MJ III, Wayne MJ. Clinical application of ventricular end – systolic elastance and the ventricular pressure – volumen diagram. SHOCK 1997;7(6):413-419.

15. Monares ZE, Arcos ZM, Sánchez CC. Reanimación del choque séptico mediante un protocolo basado en acoplamiento ventriculoarterial versus un protocolo basado en parámetros derivados de cateter de arteria pulmonar. Revista de la Asociación Mexicana de Medicina Crítica y Terapia Intensiva 2008;2:8692.

16. Chen-Huan Chen, Barry Fetics, Erez Nevo. Noninvasive single –beat determination of left ventricular end – systolic elastance in humans. JACC 38(7):2028-2034.

17. Galván CRI, Monares ZE, Chaires GR, Toledo JS, Poblano MM, Aguirre SJ, Franco GJ. Acoplamiento ventrículo-arterial en choque séptico. Revista de la Asociación Mexicana de Medicina Crítica y Terapia Intensiva 2012;XXVI(1):26-35

18. Vandromme MJ, Griffin RL, Kerby JD, McGwin G Jr, Rue LW 3rd, Weinberg JA. Identifying risk for massive transfusion in the relatively normotensive patient: utility of the prehospital shock index. J Trauma 2011;70(2):384-388.

19. Paladino L, Subramanian RA, Nabors S, Sinert R. The utility of shock index in differentiating major from minor injury. Eur J Emerg Med 2011;18(2):94-98.