medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2961 (Print)

2012, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cuba Enf 2012; 28 (4)

Nursing care interactions with patient in perioperative period

Salazar MÁM

Language: Spanish
References: 46
Page: 495-508
PDF size: 73.57 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Nursing care is based on interactions that establish patient and nursing staff in different settings, in this case is "perioperative period". Objective: To describe action / interaction strategies between the nursing staff - patient that emerged in the investigation "Living with ambivalence care interactions" Methodology: Using tools from grounded theory were conducted 47 interviews with patients and nursing staff and observation was made for 7 months. Results: Strategies of action and interaction that emerged from theoretical framework were: Fulfilling nursing rituals related to technical processes and perioperative nursing procedures an make them feel at home: tranquility, confidence and security are permanent objectives of nursing team during interactions with patient through subjective dimension of care. Conclusion: Through nursing rituals nursing staff _patient interactions living with the patient during perioperative period, feelings play a particular role and individual. There must be attributes in nursing team, as human sensibility that seeks to respect "the Other as a human being" who has feelings and sensitivity, and that along with talk and humor seek welfare and patient tranquility.


REFERENCES

  1. Colombia. El Congreso. Ley 911 de 2004. Por la cual se dictan disposiciones en materia de responsabilidad deontológica para el ejercicio de la profesión de Enfermería en Colombia; se establece el régimen disciplinario correspondiente y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: El Congreso; 2004.

  2. Rothrock JC, Ball KA, Fehr L, Gruendemann B, Murphy E, Phippen M, Reeder J et al. Project 2000 final report: A work plan for future. AORN J. 1993; 57(1):54-60. 62-63, 65, 67-72, 74-77.

  3. Leinonen T, Leino-Kilpi H, Katajisto J. The quality of intraoperative nursing care: The patient's perspective. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 24(4):843-52.

  4. Fernandez R, Griffiths R. Comparison of an evidence based regime with the standard protocol for monitoring postoperative observation: A randomized controlled trial. AJAN. 2005; 23(1):15-21.

  5. Idvall E, Rooke L. Important aspects of nursing care in surgical wards as expressed by nurses. J Clin Nurs.1998; 7(6):512-520.

  6. Junttila K, Salanterä S, Hupli M. Perioperative nurses' attitudes toward the use of nursing diagnoses in documentation. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 52(3):271-280.

  7. James N. Care=Organization + Physical Labour + emotional Labour. Sociol Health Illn 1992; 14(4):488-509.

  8. Sandelowski M. Devices and desires: Gender, technology, and American Nursing. United States of America. North Carolina: The University North Carolina; 2000. p. 67-99.

  9. Sigurdsson HO. The meaning of being a perioperative nurse. AORN J. 2001; 74(2):202-217.

  10. Riley R, Manias E. Foucault could have been an operating room nurse. J Adv Nurs. 2002; 39(4):316-324, 9.

  11. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: SAGE; 2006. P. 96-122.

  12. Charmaz K. The Grounded Theory Method: An explication and interpretation. En: Emerson RM (ed). Contemporary Field Research. Boston: Little Brown;1983. p. 109-126.

  13. Burns N, Grove SK. Investigación en enfermería. 3 ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2004. p. 425.

  14. Morse JM, Barrer M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. IJQM. 2002; 1(2):1-19.

  15. Strauss A, Corbin J. Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar teoría fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 2002. p. 17-28,134,136.

  16. Galeano Marín ME. Diseño de proyectos en la investigación cualitativa. Medellín: Fondo Editorial Universidad EAFIT; 2004. p. 71.

  17. Chiovitti RF, Piran N. Rigour and grounded theory research. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 44(4):427-435.

  18. The free dictionary by Farlex. Ritual. [Internet] [acceso 2012 Feb 10] Disponible en: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ritual

  19. Woodhead K, Behaviours and Rituals in the Operating Theatre. A report from the Hospital Infection Society Working Group on Infection Control in the Operating Theatres. Beaumont Hospital. [Internet]. 2005 [Acceso 2012 Feb 13]. Disponible en: http://www.his.org.uk/_db/_documents/Rituals-02.pdf

  20. Wall LL. Ritual meaning in surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88(4):633-637.

  21. Philpin SM. Rituals and nursing: a critical commentary. J Adv Nurs. 2002; 38(2):144-151.

  22. Wolf ZR. Nurse's work, the sacred and the profane. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1988. p. ix.

  23. Zisberg A, Young HM, Schepp K, Zysberg L. A concept analysis of routine: relevance to nursing. J AdvNurs. 57(4):442-453.

  24. Phillips N. Berry & Kohn's Operating Room Technique. 11 ed. St Louis Missouri: Mosby; 2007. p. 231-265, 602-608.

  25. Cohen MZ, Hausner J, Johnson M. Knowledge and presence: Accountability as described by nurses and surgical patients. J Prof Nurs. 1994; 10(3):177-185.

  26. Fernandes Stumm EM. Dificultades enfrentadas por enfermeiro semum centro cirúrgico. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2006; 15(3): 464-471.

  27. Fontão Zago MM, Rossi LA. Análise crítica dos rituais no contexto da enfermagem médico-cirúrgica. Rev Escola Enferm USP. 2003; 37(1):36-43.

  28. Robbins E, BroughamL, Hooper B. Sala de recuperación posanestesica. En: Hamlin L, Richardson_Tench M, Davies M. Enfermería Perioperatoria. Bogotá: Manual Moderno; 2010. P. 213-241.

  29. Rothrock JC. Alexander`S care of the patient in surgery. 13 ed. St Louis Missoui: Mosby; 2007. P. 100-128, 246-264.

  30. Quintero DI. Propuestas para humanización de la salud: cuestión de dignidad. Periódico el Pulso. Medellin, Colombia. (dic. 2003); No. 63.

  31. Bolton SC. Who cares? Offering emotion work as a gift in the nursing labour process. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32(3):580-586.

  32. Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Sentimental Work in the technological hospital. Sociol Health Illn. 1982; 4(3):255-278.

  33. Ferreira MA. A naturaleza Humana-social do cuidado de enfermagem: fronteiras do saber e do sentir expresadas na interação enfermeira e cliente. En: Anais do III Seminário Internacional de Filosofía e Saúde. Florianópolis 8-10 otubro de 2006. p. 479- 481.

  34. Williams AM, Ururita VF. Therapeutic and non-therapeutic interpersonal interactions: the patient perspective. J Clin Nurs. 2004; 13(7):806-815.

  35. Walker J, McInerny B. Patient perceptions of hospital care: building confidence. J Nurs Manag. 1998. 6(4):193-200.

  36. Giordano B. High-tech health care is great, but our first duty is to do no harm. AORN J. 1995; 61(2):314_316.

  37. Mayeroff M. On caring. Nueva York: Harper Row; 1971. p.1.

  38. Williams AM. The delivery of quality nursing care: A grounded theory study of the nurse's perspective. J Adv Nurs. 1998; 27(4):808-816.

  39. Morse J, Beyond the empathy: Expanding expressions of caring. J Adv Nurs. 1992; 17(7):809-821.

  40. Bermejo JC. La relación de ayuda como instrumento de humanización. Salir de la noche. Por una enfermería humanizada. España: Sal Térrea; 1999. p.65-95.

  41. Dean RAK, Major J. From critical care to comfort care: the sustaining value of humour. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17(8):1088_1095.

  42. Kirk K. Confidence as a factor in chronic illness care. J Adv Nurs.1992; 17(10):1238_1242.

  43. Brilowski G, Wendler C. An evolutionary concept analysis of caring. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 50(6):641_650.

  44. Nelms TP. Living a caring presence in nursing: a Heideggerian hermeneutical analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 24(2):368- 374.

  45. Osterman P. Presence: four ways of being there. Nurs Forum. 1996; 31(2):23_30.

  46. Fareed A. The experience of reassurance: patients perspectives. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 23(2):272-279.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com