2012, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Cir Plast 2012; 22 (2)
Post-surgical malformations prevention in patients with cleft lip and palate. Fundamentals and protocol
Velázquez JM, Berlanga F, Estrada H, Álvarez J, Flores M
Language: Spanish
References: 43
Page: 57-66
PDF size: 1148.05 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The objective of this work is to describe a treatment protocol to obtain adequate long-term growth and development of the maxillofacial complex in cleft lip and palate patients, avoiding or minimizing the post surgical sequelae. The objectives are to have adequate none growth with functional speech and aesthetic results. Patients will be better integrated to their psycho-social environment. The method is based on the knowledge of the negative interactions effects between that surgery produces in the growth and development inherent to the tissue, and how to handle them in a logical anatomic and functional way. In addition to this, we take into account the ability to mold or to stimulate or route the vomer-palatal complex, through maxillary pre and post surgery orthopedics. The observations shown include patients treated at other hospitals with the traditional protocol to operate lip and palate at an early age, compared to patients treated with our protocol of pre-surgical orthopedics and conservative surgery. There is a significant difference between both groups. The speech results were better than those patients operated on at an early age without an adequate follow-up. In the discussion the benefits stand out to regulate surgical criterion and treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate, to minimize the sequelae of maxillofacial growth, and achieve adequate speech at the same time. The principles presented can be adapted to the so-called surgical campaigns that are so common in our society.
REFERENCES
Ortiz-Monasterio F, Serrano A, Barrera G, Rodriguez-Hoffman H, Vinageras E. A study of untreated adult cleft palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 38(1): 36-41.
Liao YF, Cole TJ, Mars M. Hard palate repair timing and facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a longitudinal study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43(5): 547-556.
Smahel Z, Mullerova Z. Craniofacial morphology in unilateral cleft lip and palate prior to palatoplasty. Cleft Palate J 1986; 23: 225-232.
Friede H, Möller M, Lilja J, Lauritzen C, Johanson B. Facial morphology and occlusion at the stage of early mixed dentition in cleft lip and palate patients treated with delayed closure of the hard palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1987; 21: 65-71.
Smahel Z, Betineová L, Müllerová Z, Skvarilová B. Facial growth and development in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate from palate surgery up to adulthood. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1993; 13: 57-71.
Lilja J, Mars M, Elander A, Enocson L, Hagberg C, Worrell E et al. Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43(5): 606-611.
Mars M, Houston WJ. A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27: 7-10.
Normando AD, da Silva Filho OG, Capelozza Filho L. Influence of surgery on maxillary growth in cleft lip and/or palate patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992; 20: 111-118.
Capelozza Júnior L, Taniguchi SM, da Silva Júnior OG. Craniofacial morphology of adult unoperated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993; 30(4): 376-381.
Long RE, Semb G, Shaw WC. Orthodontic treatment of the patient with complete clefts of lip, alveolus and palate: lessons of the past 60 years. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37: 533-538.
Hellquist R, Pontén B. The influence of infant periosteoplasty on facial growth and dental occlusion from five to eight years of age in cases of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13: 305–312.
Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1: Treatment affecting growth. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24:5-77.
Semb R, Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1: Treatment affecting growth. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24: 5-77.
Voshol IE, Van der Wal KG, Van Adrichem LN, Ongkosuwito EM, Koudstaal MJ. The frequency of le fort I osteotomy in cleft patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012; 49(2): 160-166.
Good PM, Mulliken JB, Padwa BL. Frequency of le fort i osteotomy after repaired cleft lip and palate or cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2007; 44(4): 396-401.
Daskalogiannakis J, Mehta M. The need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired complete unilateral and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009; 46(5): 498-502.
Shaw WC, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Mřlsted K et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992; 29: 393-397.
Berkowitz S, Mejia M, Bystrik A. Comparison of the effects of the latham-millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part I. dental occlusion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113(1): 1-18.
Fisher DM. Unilateral cleft lip repair: an anatomical subunit approximation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116(1): 61-71.
Bezuhly M, Fisher DM. Single-stage repair of asymmetrical bilateral cleft lip with contralateral lesser form defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129(3): 751-757
Mars M, Plint DA, Houston WJ, Bergland O, Semb G. The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24(4): 314-322.
Adali N, Mars M, Petrie A, Noar J, Sommerlad B. Presurgical orthopedics has no effect on arch form in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012; 49(1): 5-13.
Prahl C, Prahl-Andersen B, Van’t Hof MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Infant orthopedics and facial appearance: a randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43(6): 659-664.
Hotz M, Gnoinski W, Perko M, Nussbaumer H, Hof E, Haubensar R. The Zurich approach, 1964 to 1984. In: Hotz M, Gnoinski W, Perko M, Nussbaumer H, Hof E, Haubensak R, eds. Early treatment of cleft lip and palate. Toronto: Hans Huber 1986: 42-48.
Burston WR. Pre-surgical facial orthopedics in relationship to the overall management of cleft lip and palate conditions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1971; 48(1): 31-32.
Peltomäki T, Vendittelli BL, Grayson BH, Cutting CB, Brecht LE. Associations between severity of clefting and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with infant orthopedics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38(6): 582-586.
Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip, and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38(3): 193-198.
Bardach J. Analysis of 233 cases of cleft lip and palate treated in 1955 through 1959. Stomatol Rev 1960; 1: 10-11.
Bardach J. The influence of cleft lip repair on facial growth. Cleft Palate J 1990; 271: 76-78.
Bardach J, Morris HL, Olin WH. Late results of primary veloplasty: the Marburg Project. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 207–218.
Eisebach KJ, Bardach J, Klausner EC. The influence of primary unilateral cleft lip repair on facial growth. Part II: direct cephalometry of the skull. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15:109-117.
Bardach J, Eisebach KJ. The influence of primary unilateral lip repair on facial growth. Part I-Lip pressure. Cleft Palate J 1977, 14: 88-97.
Rullo R, Laino G, Cataneo M, Mazzarella N, Festa VM, Gombos F. The effect of Delaire cheilorhinoplasty on midfacial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 2009 31(1): 64-67.
Capelozza Filho L, Correa AD, da Silva Filho OG. Isolated influences of lip and palate surgery on facial growth: comparison of operated and unoperated male adults with UCLP. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996; 33(1): 51-56.
Lohmander A, Friede H, Lilja J. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate after the gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure protocol speech outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012; 49(6): 657-671.
Lohmander-Agerskov A, Friede H, Lilja J, Söderpalm E. Delayed closure of the hard palate: a comparison of speech in children with open and functionally closed residual clefts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996; 30: 121–127.
Lohmander-Agerskov A, Söderpalm E. Evaluation of speech after completed late closure of the hard palate. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1993; 45: 25-30.
Lohmander-Agerskov A, Willadsen E. A comparison of long term speech results following delayed hard palate closure concept and a conventional two-stage vomer flap/pushback procedure in UCLP patients. Memories of the Sixth European Craniofacial Congress; June 1999; Manchester, England, U.K.
Hotz MM, Gnoinski WM, Nussbaumer H, Kistler E. Early maxillary orthopedics in CLP cases: guidelines for surgery. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15: 405-411.
Van Demark DR, Gnoinski W, Hotz MM, Perko M, Nussbaumer H. Speech results of the Zürich approach in the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83: 605-613.
Schweckendiek W, Doz P. Primary veloplasty: long-term results without maxillary deformity. A twenty-five year report. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15: 268-274.
Velazquez JM, Berlanga F, Alvarez J, Estrada H. Early cleft lip-palate repair cleft untreated memories of the Fifth Biennial World Cleft Congress of the International cleft lip and palate foundation, in Dallas-fort worth, Texas, USA, September 2008; 22-26.
Velazquez JM, Berlanga F, Alvarez J, Estrada H. Delayed hard palate closure. Long term results. Memories of the 8th Int. Congress on Cleft Palate Craniofacial Anomalies. Fortaleza, Brazil, 2009.