2012, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Rev Med MD 2012; 3.4 (2)
Endourological application of polydimethylsiloxane in the treatment of vesicoureteal reflux on children
Camacho-Muñoz E, Aguirre-García D, Acosta-Real JD, Aguirre-Cervantes GF, Gutiérrez-Enríquez R, Sánchez-Álvarez O, Aguirre-Jáuregui O
Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 85-90
PDF size: 591.56 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Between 3 5% of girls and 1 2% of boys suffer from a urinary infections before puberty. The vesicoureteal reflux (VUR) is a common urinary
tract abnormality. Since 1980, the endoscopic handling for the VUR was an alternative to the prophylaxis with antibiotics for a prolonged time
and the surgical intervention on children. We present the experience of our service in the endourological solution of pediatrics patients with
VUR (uni or bilateral) through the endoscopical application of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).
Material and methods:
It is a descriptive and observational study of patients with vesicoureteal grade II to V, from June of 2006 to August of 2007 in the unit of
pediatric endourology of the Fray Antonio Alcalde Civil Hospital of Guadalajara.
Results:
During the period of study were performed a total of 250 diverse endouscopical procedures in the unit of pediatric endourology. Of this total,
50 patients were identified with VUR grades II to V. 9 cases were excluded. From the rest, 30 (73%) were female patients and the remaining,
male. The mean age was 5.3 years. Half of them presented only fever; in a quarter of the patients, it was associated with abdominal pain,
lumbar pain, vomit and convulsive crises, and the other 25% presented urinary symptoms. On 32 patients (78%), was required only 1
application of PDMS; while on the rest, 2 were needed. In the follow up, was found that 67% (12 cases) of primary VUR were solved
completely, 1 case presented migration of PDMS and the remaining diminished the grade of reflux. From the secondary VUR, 19 cases (55%)
had a complete healing with the 1st injection, 15% (5) received a 2nd injection and on the rest, diminished the grade of reflux.
Conclusions:
The endoscopical correction of the VUR on pediatrics is a safe, effective and less invasive alternative, with good results on primary and
secondary refluxes, even on high grade. Diminishes and avoids the kidney damage associated to the prolonged use of antibiotics; besides can be
performed in ambulatory care, representing an adequate alternative of handling.
REFERENCES
Fanos V, Cataldi L. Antibiotics or surgery for vesicoureteric reflux in children. Lancet. 2004 Nov 6- 12;364(9446):1720-2.
Murawski IJ, Gupta IR. Vesicoureteric reflux and renal malformations: a developmental problem. Clin Genet. 2006 Feb;69(2):105-17.
3- Tekgül S, Riedmiller H, Hoebeke P, Kovara R, Nijman RJ, Radmayr C, et al. EAU Guidelines on vesicoureteral reflux in children. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):534-42.
4- De la Peña-Zarzuelo E. Tratamiento del reflujo vesico-ureteral primario en la infancia: comparación de dos revisiones sistemáticas. Actas Urol Esp 2005; 29 (2): 138-162
5- Caldamone AA. Injection therapy for vesicoureteral reflux. Cap. 46. 691-710. Clinical Pediatric Urology. Fifth edition.
6- Dawrant MJ, Mohanan N, Puri P. Endoscopic treatment for high grade vesicoureteral reflux in infants. J Urol. 2006; 176:1874-1850.
7- Herz D, Hafez A, Bagil D, Capolicchio G, McLorie G, Khoury A. Efficacy of endoscopic subureteral polydimethylsiloxane injection for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children: a north american clinical report. J Urol. 2001; 166: 1880-1886.
8- Capozza N, Caione P. Vesicoureteral reflux: surgical and endoscopic treatment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007 Sep;22(9):1261-5.
9- O'Donnell B, Puri P. Endoscopic correction of primar y vesicoureteric ref lux. Br J Urol. 1986Dec;58(6):601-4.
10-Al-Hunayan A, Kehinde EO, Elsalam MA, Al- Mukhtar RS. Outcome of endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux in children using Polydimethylsiloxane. J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):2181- 3.
11-Bartoli F, Niglio F, Gentile O, Penza R, Aceto G, Leggio S. Endoscopic treatment with Polydimethylsiloxane in children with dilating vesico-ureteric reflux. BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):805-8.
12-Van Capelle JW, De Haan T, El Sayed W, Azmy A. The long-term outcome of the endoscopic subureteric implantation of polydimethylsiloxane for treating vesico-ureteric reflux in children: a retrospective analysis of the first 195 consecutive patients in two European centers. BJU Int. 2004 Dec;94(9):1348-51.
13-Oswald J, Riccabona M, Lusuardi L, Bartsch G, Radmayr C. Prospective comparison and 1-year follow-up of a single endoscopic subureteral polydimethylsiloxane versus dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5):894-7; discussion 898.
14-Aboutaleb H, Bolduc S, Upadhyay J, Farhat W, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE. Subureteral polydimethylsiloxane injection versus extravesical reimplantation for primary low grade vesicoureteral reflux in children: a comparative study. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):313-6.
15-Dodat H, Aubert D, Chavrier Y, Geiss S, Guys JM, Lacombed A, et al. Vesicoureteric reflux in children long-term results of endoscopic treatment by Macroplastique injection. Prog Urol. 2004; 14 (3):380- 384.
16-Kuoame DB, Szwarc C, Lardy H, Lacombe A, Robert M. Failures of endoscopic treatment of Vesico - uretericrefluxin children using Macroplastique. Prog Urol. 2005 Apr;15(2):291-5; discussion 295.
17-Kuoame DB, Szwarc C, Lardy H, Lacombe A, Robert M. Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux in children: results of 9 years of use of Macroplastique. Prog Urol. 2003; 13 (6):1368-1371.
18-Craig JC, Irwing LM, Knigth JF, Roy LP. Does treatment of vesicoureteric reflux in childhood prevent end-stage renal disease attributable to reflux nephropathy? Pediatrics 2000; 105 (6):1236-1240.
19-Aboutaleb H, Bolduc S, Khoury AE, Upadhyay J, Bagli DJ, Farhat W. Polydimethylsiloxane injection versus open surgery for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in complete duplex systems. J Urol. 2003; 170(4 Pt 2):1563-5.
20-Michael H, Hubert S, Laurence S, Baskin LS, Meng MV. Cost-Utility analysis of treatment algorithms for moderate grade vesicoureteral reflux using Markov models. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):703-9; discussion 709.
21-Trsinar B, Cotic D, Oblak C. Possible causes of unsuccessful endoscopic collagen treatment of vesicoureteric reflux in children. Eur Urol. 1999 Dec;36(6):635-9.