2012, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Patol Rev Latinoam 2012; 50 (4)
Investigation of human papilloma virus DNA in the cervixes of women in rural population of Peru
Concha-M R, Árias-Stella JJ, Quiñones D, Bazán M, Iwasaki R, Árias-Stella J
Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 266-271
PDF size: 218.26 Kb.
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine the prevalence of HPV and cervical intraepithelial lesions in 384 women –between the ages of 20 and 64-– from
the six regions with the highest percentage of rural inhabitants in Peru according to the National Institute of Statistics and Data Processing
(INEI). These regions were Huancavelica, Cajamarca, Huanuco, Amazonas, Apurimac and Puno. The sample size was determined using
the following statistical formula: n = Z12 × p × q/d2; n = 384.16.
The cytological diagnosis was based on samples suspended in a liquid preparation which were categorized according to the Bethesda
Classification System. A Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay and a PCR GP5/GP6 assay were performed to amplify part of the genomes of
several HPV types to determine if the infection was caused by one of more HPV types. The results show that 6.77 % of the women had
abnormalities detected in the liquid based cytological studies (ASCUS, LGSIL, HGSIL and AGUS) and 4.4 % of the women had some type
of lesion according to the histological analysis (LGSIL, HGSIL, adenocarcinoma or epidermoid carcinoma). In conclusion, we found out
that there was HPV DNA in all of the detected lesions, the most common being HPV type 16, which was found in 6 (8.22 %) participants
with some type of lesion, followed by a co-infection (HPV 16 and 31) in 4 of the participants (5.48 %).
REFERENCES
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74-108.
Bella MC, Schmidt-Grimminger D, Patrick S, Ryschon T, Linz L, Chauhan SC. High prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in American Indian women of the Northern Plains. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107(2):236-241.
Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:244-265.
Fontaine V, Mascaux C, Weyn C, Bernis A, Celio N. Evaluation of Combined General Primer-Mediated PCR Sequencing and Type-Specific PCR Strategies for Determination of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Cervical Cell Specimens. J Clin Microb 2007;45(3):928-34.
Muñoz N, Bosch FX, De San Jose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cáncer. N Eng J Med 2003;348:518-527.
Hopkins, J. Ginecología y Obstetricia. Marban, España. 2005, p. 451.
Centro de Investigación en Cáncer “Maes-Heller”. Registro de Cáncer de Lima Metropolitana. 1994-1997. Diciembre, 2004; Volumen III.
Guerrero-Alva I. Study of Prevalence of VPH Infection in Population Apparently Asyntomatic. Acta Cancer Set 1993;23(3):37- 41.
Almonte M, et.al. Cervical screening by visual inspection, VPH testing, liquid-based and conventional cytology in Amazonian Peru. Int J Cancer 2007;121:796-802.
Li Ning ML, Bazan M, Arias-Stella Jr, J. USCAP 2008. United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. March 1-7, 2008. Denver, CO. USA.
Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright T Jr., et. al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. 2002;287(16):2114-2119.
Users Guide. Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk VPH ADN Test. Digene VPH test. 2007, Digene Corporation. Gaithersburg, MD USA.
User Manual. PureLink Genomic ADN Kits. For purification of genomic ADN. Version A. February 2007. INVITROGEN.
Van Den Brule AJC, Pol R, Fransen-Daalmeijer N, Schouls LM, Meijer CJLM, Snijders P. GP5+/6+PCR followed by Reverse Line Blot Analysis Enables Rapid and High-Throughput Identification of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes. J Clin Microb Mar 2002;40(3):779-787.
Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Ferre E, Bosch FX, De Sanjosé S. Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. J Infect Dis 2010;15;202(12):1789-99.