medigraphic.com

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2012; 50 (1)

Medical students’ pleasure for participating in peer assessment

Amato D, Hernández-Zinzún G, Novales-Castro XJ

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 33-38
PDF size: 34.77 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: to explore the agreement of medical students (MS) with the statement “I liked participating in my peers’ assessment” and the explanations why.
Methods: the peer assessment of 411 MS who participated consisted in assessing audiovisual lectures presented by their classmates using rubrics. Then, they classified their grade of agreement with the statement “I liked participating in my peers’ assessment” and briefly explained why. An analysis of content was performed, response categories were classified, and a simple count of the number of responses in each category was done.
Results: most of the MS (68 %) liked participating in peer assessment completely or partially. The major negative explanations were the concern that affective considerations would influence the grades (18 %), and the perception of unfair assessments (12.2 %). The positive ones were the perception of a more fair assessment (11 %), and the idea that it provides feedback for improvement (9.5 %).
Conclusions: knowing the explanations given by the MS to support their agreement with the pleasure for participating in peer assessment allows a more adequate approach to conflicts.


REFERENCES

  1. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med 2007;356(4):387-396.

  2. Amato D, Novales-Castro XJ. Aceptación del aprendizaje basado en problemas y de la evaluación entre pares por los estudiantes de medicina. Gac Med Mex 2009;145(3): 197-205.

  3. Amato D, Novales-Castro XJ. Desempeño académico y aceptación del aprendizaje basado en problemas en estudiantes de medicina. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2010;48(2):219-226.

  4. Dueñas BH. El aprendizaje basado en problemas como enfoque pedagógico en la educación en salud. Colomb Med 2001;32(4):189-196.

  5. Arnold L, Shue CK, Kritt B, Ginsburg S, Stern DT. Medical students’ views on peer assessment of professionalism. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20(9):819-824. Disponible en http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1490208/ ?tool=pubmed

  6. Linn BS, Arostegui M, Zeppa R. Performance rating scale for peer and self-assessment. Br J Med Educ 1975;9(2): 98-101.

  7. Thomas PA, Gebo KA, Hellmann DB. A pilot study of peer review in residency training. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14(9): 551-554. Disponible en http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC1496737/?tool=pubmed

  8. Rennie SC, Crosby JR. Students’ perceptions of whistle blowing: implications for self-regulation. A questionnaire and focus group survey. Med Educ 2002;36(2):173-179.

  9. Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M, Haynes M. An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials. Med Teach 2007:29(5):e122-32.

  10. Valencia-Sánchez JS, Leyva-González FA, Viniegra-Velázquez L. Alcances de una estrategia educativa promotora de la participación en el desarrollo de la aptitud clínica y lectura crítica en residentes de cardiología, vinculando el uso apropiado de los informes de investigación. Rev Invest Clin 2007;59(4):268-277.

  11. Díaz-Barriga AF, Hernández RG. Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: una interpretación constructivista. México: McGraw-Hill-Interamericana; 2002.

  12. Leung WC. Competency based medical training: review. BMJ 2002;325(7366):693-696. Disponible en http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC126659/

  13. Venturelli J. Educación médica: nuevos enfoques metas y métodos. Washington, DC: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 1997. p. 181-189.

  14. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001;357(9260):945- 949.

  15. Lurie SJ, Nofziger AC, Meldrum S, Mooney C, Epstein RM. Temporal and group related trends in peer assessment amongst medical students. Med Educ 2006;40(9): 840-847.

  16. Lurie SJ, Lambert DR, Nofziger AC, Epstein RM, Grady- Weliky TA. Relationship between peer assessment during medical school, dean’s letter rankings, and ratings by internship directors. J Gen Intern Med 2007:22(1):13- 16. Disponible en http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC1824780/?tool=pubmed

  17. Machado JL, Machado VM, Grec W, Bollela VR, Vieira JE. Self- and peer-assessment may not be an accurate measure of PBL tutorial process. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8:55.

  18. Díaz-Barriga AF. Enseñanza situada: vínculo entre la escuela y la vida. México: Mc Graw-Hill Interamericana; 2006: p. 126-152.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com