Fajardo-Gutiérrez A

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 121-124
PDF size: 148.07 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The results of the cancer data registered during 1996-2007 demonstrates how fundamental is the work the registrar in the integrity of a Registry of Childhood Cancer. The work consisted: collecting the complete information available (the number of cases and information of the variables), encoding the information according to international standards, and classifying the data by capturing, analyzing, and producing the respective reports. The objective of having quality data (complete, valid and timely) is to estimate the incidence and trends of cancer in the population. The professional for the registration does not exist in the current Mexican work force. Given that a national program of cancer registries is of vital importance for improved planning medical care, allotment of medical resources, in cancer research. It will be necessary to create such a profession by establishing national standards and training programs.

REFERENCES

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Quality cancer data saves lives. The vital role of Cancer Registrars in the fight against cancer. Disponible en http://www. cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/pdf/QualityData90min.pdf

2. Live RE. Introduction to cancer registries. En: Hutchison CL, Menck HR, Burch M, Gottschalk R, editores. Cancer registry management principles and practice. Second edition. Iowa, USA : Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 2004. p. 1-8.

3. Ross F. Quality control of cancer registry data. En: Hutchison CL, Menck HR, Burch M, Gottschalk R, editores. Cancer registry management principles and practice. Second edition. Iowa, USA: Kend all/Hunt Publishing Company; 2004. p. 199-208.

4. Roffers SD. Case completeness and data quality assessments in central cancer registries and their relevance to cancer control. En: Howe HL, editor. Cancer incidence in North America 1988-1990. Springfield CA: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; 1995; p. 1-9.

5. Intlekofer R. The National Cancer Registrars Association. En: Hutchison CL, Menck HR, Burch M, Gottschalk R. Cancer registry management principles and practice. Second edition. Iowa, USA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 2004. p. 11-16.

6. Curado MP, Voti L, Sortino-Rachou AM. Cancer registration data and quality indicators in low and middle income countries: their interpretation and potential use for the improvement of cancer care. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20(5):751-756.

7. Larsen IK, Smastuen M, Johannesen TB, Langmark F, Parkin DM, Bray F, Moller B. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45(7):1218-1231.

8. Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:756-764.

9. Tucker TC, Howe HL. Measuring the quality of populationbased cancer registries: the NAACCR perspective. J Reg Management 2001;28(1):41-44.

10. Valsecchi MG, Steliarova-Foucher E. Cancer registration in developing countries: luxury or necessity? Lancet Oncol 2008;9(2):159-167.

11. Valdés-Ramírez L. Tiempo transcurrido entre el inicio de los síntomas y signos, diagnóstico, estadio e inicio de tratamiento en niños con cáncer atendidos en el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias, México, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, 2006.

12. Rivera-Luna R. Generalidades. En: Rivera-Luna R, editor. El niño con cáncer. Los padecimientos más comunes para el médico no especialista. México: Editores de Textos Mexicanos; 2007 p.1-20.

13. Consejo Nacional de Población (Conapo). Proyecciones de la población de México 2005-2050 realizadas en base al II Conteo de Población y Vivienda. México: INEGI; 2005.