Association of the morphophysiology and the ectoparasite load found in two rat populations (Rattus sp.) in La Habana province

Ariamys Companioni Ibañez; Vicente Berovides Alvarez; Natividad Hernández Contreras; Jorge Cantillo Padrón; José Luis de la Fuente Arbola

2012, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Med Trop 2012; 64 (3)

Association of the morphophysiology and the ectoparasite load found in two rat populations (Rattus sp.) in La Habana province

Companioni IA, Berovides ÁV, Hernández CN, Cantillo PJ, de la Fuente AJL

Full text

How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 224-234
PDF size: 165.87 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: some physioecological responses from rodents may be registered through the study of morphological indexes, which is an important factor for the control of rodents.
Objectives: to compare the morphophysiological variables in two rat populations and relate them to the ectoparasite loads.
Methods: this study was carried out from 2007 to 2008 in two sites of La Habana province. Specially prepared traps to catch rats alive were used. Four morphophysiological indexes were studied and then compared through a variance analysis for the two sites.
Results: one hundred four Rattus rattus (83.6 %) and Rattus norvegicus (16.4 %) were analyzed. The relative kidney index showed highly significant different between the rat populations. The morphophysiological indexes were lower in parasitized animals. The ecological importance and the implications of these indexes for the control of obtained results were discussed in this paper.
Conclusions: the morphophysiological analysis proved that the necessary resources for the survival of these species are available, which favors that both rat sexes bear the ectoparasite load in a better way, and thus they represent parasite reservoirs and a permanent transmission risk.

REFERENCES

Spotorno AE, Palma RE, Valladares JP. Biología de roedores reservorios de hantavirus en Chile. Rev Chil Infect. 2000;17(3):197-210.
Villafaña F, Montero G, Rodríguez J, Hernández L. Efectividad comparativa de rodenticidas químico (Klerat) y microbiológico (Biorat) utilizados en Cuba. Rev Cubana Cienc Vet. 2000; 26(1):27-9.
Varona LS. Mamíferos de Cuba. 2da ed. la Habana: Ed. Gente Nueva; 2005. p. 134.
Villafaña F, Silva M, Ruiz J, Sánchez LG, Campos A. Evaluación del impacto del biorrodenticida Biorat en poblaciones de roedores establecidos en varios cultivos en la República de Costa Rica. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 1999;51(3):185-8.
Easterbrook JD, Shields T, Klein SL, Glass GE. Norway rat population in Baltimore, Maryland, 2004. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2005;5(3):296-9.
Kim HC, Klein TA, Chong ST, Collier B. Seroepidemiological Survey of rodents collected at a U.S military installation, Yongsan Garrison, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Mil Med. 2007;172(7):759-64.
Valdés L. Enfermedades emergentes y reemergentes. La Habana: Ed. Ciencias Médicas; 2008. p. 310.
Villafaña F, Trigo JÁ, Armada JA. Técnica de trampeo para el estudio poblacional de ratas y ratones aplicado a control. Rev Cubana Hig Epid. 1981;19(4):417-33.
Villafaña F, Silva M, Ruiz J, Sánchez LG, Campos A. Evaluación del impacto del biorrodenticida Biorat en poblaciones de roedores establecidos en varios cultivos en la República de Costa Rica. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 1999;51(3):185-8.
Durant P, Díaz A, Díaz de Pascual A. Informaciones ecológicas de una población de ratas casiriguas (Proechimys sp.) en áreas adyacentes a la presa "Las Cuevas". Complejo hidroeléctrico de Los Andes "Leonardo Ruíz Pineda". Estado Táchira. Venezuela. Rev Ecol Lat Am. 1995;3(1-3):39-50.
Mills JN, Childs JE, Ksiazek TG, Peters CJ. Métodos para trampeo y muestreo de pequeños mamíferos para estudios virológicos. Washington: OPS/HPC/HTC; 1998. p. 66.
Alayo P. Lista de los mamíferos de Cuba (vivientes y extinguidos). Santiago de Cuba: Universidad de Oriente; 1958. p. 24.
Pearson OP. An outbreak of mice in the coastal desert of Peru. Mammalian. 1975;39(3):375-86.
Williams de Castro M, Valle DF, Tamashiro R, Cossios D, Medina F. Clases de edades y patrones de estacionalidad reproductiva en roedores de la localidad de Tambo, provincia de Canta. Ecología. 1998;1(1):102-6.
Harper GA, Dickinson KJM, Seddon PJ. Habitat use by three rat species (Rattus spp.) on Sterwart Island/ Rakiura, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol. 2005;29(2):251-60.
Monge J. Estructura poblacional y actividad reproductiva de la rata de campo (Sigmodon hirsutus) durante un ciclo de reproducción de maní (Arachis hypogea) en Costa Rica. Agronomía Costarricense. 2008;32(2):161-7.
Rath P, Biewald G. Animales en el experimento. La Habana: Ed. Cientifico-Técnica; 1988. p. 305.
Adams L, Finn JA. Behavioral indices of adrenal gland weight in the California ground squirrel. Ecology. 1972;53:173-6.
Gosling LM, Huson LW, Addison GC. Age stimation of coypus (Myocastor coypus) from eye lens weight. J Appled Ecol. 1980;17:641-7.
Sánchez JA, Comas A, Berovides V. Indices morfofisiológicos en poblaciones de jutias (Rodentia, Capromyidae). Revista Biología. 1992;6(3):174-81.
Durant P, Díaz A. Aspecto de la ecología de roedores musarañas de las cuencas hidrográficas andino-venezolanas. Carib J Sci. 1995;31(1-2):83-94.
Díaz GB, Ojeda RA, Pezende EL Renal morphology, phylogenetic history and desert adaptation of South American rodents. Funtional Ecol. 2006;20:609-20.
Magnaou E, Fons R, Feliu C, Morand S. Physiological responses of insular wild black rat (Rattus rattus) to natural infection by the digenean trematode Fasciola hepatica. Parasitol Res. 2006;99:97-101.