2011, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Anales de Radiología México 2011; 10 (4)
Defecography: review and experience of Hospital San José, Tec de Monterrey
Carrillo MMÁ, Ávila AJA, Martínez MA, Sánchez ÁMT, Morales GLA, Elizondo VTC
Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 247-257
PDF size: 212.42 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Defecography
is a study that provides functional
and structural information
on the anorectal region. Patients
with defecatory disorders, such
as fecal incontinence and constipation,
are difficult to diagnose
and treat. Defecography may
help in evaluating such patients,
both in detecting anatomical abnormalities
and possible causes
of such disorders and as an
anatomical guide if surgical correction
proves necessary.
Purpose. The purpose of this
article is to review the anatomy
of the pelvic floor and the physiology
of defecation, describe the
technique of defecography and
radiological diagnosis of defecatory
disorders and prolapse of
the pelvic organs, and finally to
report the experience of Hospital
San Jose Tec de Monterrey with
this radiological technique.
Material and methods. Three
hundred and thirty-one defecatory
studies performed in patients
at Hospital San Jose Tec de Monterrey,
from 1996 to 2010, were
retrospectively analyzed. Two
hundred and ninety-one women
and 40 men were included, with
ages ranging from 4 to 80 years
(average age 41.03 years). Aperture
of the anal canal, relaxation
of the puborectalis muscle,
evacuation of contrast medium,
pelvic floor descent, mucosal
procidentia, and rectal prolapse
were evaluated.
Results. All the defecographies
revealed some abnormality.
Two hundred and eighty-eight
anterior rectoceles, 21 posterior
rectoceles, as well as 140 cases
of invagination, 99 of pelvic
floor descent, 40 of enterocele,
and 37 of mucosal procidentia
and prolapse were identified,
and other anomalies such as 1
ulcer (0.15%), 1 megarectum
(0.15%), and 1 incontinence
(0.15%).
Conclusion. Today defecography
plays a very important role
in evaluation of patients with
constipation and has influenced
the choice of different treatment
options.
REFERENCES
Ikenberry S, Lappas S, Hanna M, Rex D. Defecography In healthy subjects: Comparison of three contrast media. Radiology 1996;201:233-238.
Goei R. Anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders and asymptomatic subjects: Evaluation with defecography. Radiology 1990;174:121- 123.
Harvey C, Halligan S, Bartram C, Hollings N, Sahdev A, Kingston K. Evacuation proctography: A prospective study of diagnostic and therapeutic effects. Radiology 1999;211:223-227.
Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography. I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:247–251.
Karasick S, Karasick D, Karasick S. Functional disorders of the anus and rectum: Findings on defecography, Pictorial Essay. AJR 1993;160:777-782.
Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram C. State of the art, Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 2001;218:621-641.
Savoye-Collete C, Koning E y Dacher J. Radiologic evaluation of pelvic floor disorder. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2008;37:553-567.
Ekberg O, Nylander G. Defecography. Radiology 1985;155:45-48.
Gimeno F. La defecografía en el estudio del compartimento posterior del suelo de la pelvis en mujeres con prolapso genital. Universitat de Barcelona Falcutat de Medicina Departamento d’obstetricia, ginecología, pediatría, radiología y medicina física._________. 1-137.
Goei R, Engelshoven J, Schouten H. Anorectal function: Defecographic measurements of in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 1989;173:137-141.
Halligan S, Malour A, Bartram C, Marshal M. Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR 2001;177:633-636.
Pomerri F, Zuliani M, Mazza C, Vilarejo, Scopece A. Defecographic measurments of rectal intussusception and prolapse in patients and in asymptomatic subjects. AJR 2001;176:641-645.
Maglinte D, Bartram C, Hale D, Park J et al. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 2011;258:23-39.
Goei R, Baeten C, Arends J. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: Findings at barium enema and defecography. Radiology 1988;168:303-306.
Goei R, Baeten C. Rectal intussusceptions and rectal prolapsed: Detection and postoperative evaluation with defecography. Radiology 1990;171:124- 126.
Bernier P, Stevenson G, Shorvon P. Defecography commode. Radiology 1988; 166:891-892.6
Lessafer L. Defecography-Update 1994, Book Review. Radiology 1997;692.
Kelvin F, Maglinte D, Hornback J, Benson J. Pelvic prolapsed: Assessment with evacuation proctography (Defecography). Radiology 1992;184:547- 551.
Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, Graf W. Defecography Study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology 1999;210:103-108.
Alfisher M, Scholz F, Roberts P, Couniban T. Radiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Normal findings, examination pitfalls, and complications. Radiographics 1997;17:81-98.
Dobben A, Wiersma T, Janssen L. Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for defecography in fecal incontinence. AJR 2005;185:1166-1172.
Marrufo C, Sánchez M, Morales L. Manometría y defecografía en pacientes constipados con disquecia. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2005;70(4):424-429.