Language: Spanish
References: 64
Page: 287-296
PDF size: 131.64 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, violence within couples is the most alarming form of interpersonal violence. It could even be considered a public health problem.
Nevertheless, although the magnitude is as serious as the repercussions of the aggression suffered by the victims, there is a general tendency to restrict the focus of attention to the physical aspect of the problem.
Thus, the study of psychological abuse is relegated to a secondary plane, ignoring those works that demonstrate the presence of psychological aggression with serious consequences, comparable to or even greater than those of a physical nature, even though the former are more difficult to predict.
For this reason, there is little consensus concerning the specific behaviour patterns that make up psychological abuse.
Nevertheless, among its most evident characteristics, we can point to such manifestations as insults, criticism, humiliations, disparagement or ridicule, both in public and in private, social and economic isolation, repeated threats to either abandon the relationship or to seek a divorce, threats of abuse towards the victims or their loved ones and those related with harming or destroying the victim’s cherished belongings, whether they be objects or animals, which may be psychologically traumatic for the victim.
On the other hand, such conduct as manipulating information, affective neglect, denial of violence and putting the blame entirely on the victim can be listed as hidden expressions of psychological abuse in couples.
Similarly, several works have established a link between a wide range of psychological and behavioural symptoms connected to psychological violence in couples with numerous aspects of emotional intelligence.
On an interpersonal level, conflictive couples seem to respond to communicative registers far removed from emotional intelligence or such partner skills as empathy, self-control and co-operation, thus leading to violent relational dynamics.
The current research analyses psychological abuse in couples (
disparagement, hostility, indifference, intimidation, imposition of behaviour patterns, blaming and apparent kindness) and its connection with the level of emotional competence (
emotiveness, efficacy, rigidity and illusion) shown by the individuals that make up the couple.
The research was carried out in the context of the University of Extremadura (Spain). The sample was selected randomly and was made up of 1 080 university students, of whom 332 were male and 748 female, aged in four categories covering the range from 17 to 23 years or more.
Following the sample selection, the deans and department directors were informed of the aims of the research, their approval was sought to implement the research instruments and to guarantee the collaboration of the lecturers in the various degree subjects chosen.
Then, a joint calendar was established to apply the tests. The surveys were carried out during the academic years 2007/2008 and 2008/2009.
The tests were collectively administered in single sessions. Copies of the survey were handed out along with instructions. Volunteers were then told to fill in personal data and the instructions were read out aloud, stressing the importance of answering all the questions without exception. Finally, doubts were answered, taking care not to influence the subjects’ replies.
The confidentiality of the students’ answers was guaranteed by coding each questionnaire with a numerical identification. After the questionnaires were handed in, the students’ replies were checked for compliance with the protocols, and on the basis of atypical replies and questions left unanswered.
Only two questionnaires were eliminated due to protocol and no atypical answers or unanswered questions were found. The order was exactly the same for all the applications: First of all the
Inventory of Constructive Thought (15 to 30 minutes), and secondly the
Questionnaire on Psychological Abuse (15 to 20 minutes).
The main results of the study, with respect to the indicators of psychological abuse in couples, are as follows: the existence of patterns of psychological violence in the relationships of couples of university students is confirmed.
Of the most significant sub-factors of psychological abuse, the most frequently used by these young people were those included in (3)
Indifference, while the least commonly used were those included in (7)
Apparent Kindness.
As for the relationship between psychologically abusive behaviour patterns and emotional competence during pre-marital relationships, there are significant differences.
Finally, the presence of significant correlations between most factors and sub-factors of psychological abuse in couples and the different emotional skills is confirmed.
To conclude, it can be said that the research provides evidence that the indicators of psychological abuse in couples start to appear during pre-marital relationships.
An analysis of the results demonstrates that these subjects put into practice such indicators and/or manifestations as: trivializations, reproaches, lack of empathy or support, judging, criticising, correcting, abusive insistence and accusations.
The students from the sample show no marked tendency towards the exercise of any form of psychological violence in particular.
Rather, they exhibit a heterogeneous behavioural repertory made up of disparagement, confrontation, lack of interest or affection, coercion, attempts to restrict the victim psychologically or socially, and blaming the victim for the aggressor’s own violent response.
Also worthy of note are such specific manifestations as: the aggressor’s interest in disparaging any behaviour or attitude adopted by the partner, showing serious resistance to listening and sharing the partner’s reality, unless to chide them.
Similarly, the existence of behaviour patterns can be appreciated through which aggressors implacably and strictly censure their partner for not living up to their own expectations, forcing the situation until they can release their anger and personal tension and thus get their way with the victim.
In addition, the presence of indifference can also be appreciated as the commonest expression of psychological violence among young people aged between 17 and 23. This demonstrates a lack of affective involvement that makes empathy, support and respect towards the individuality of the victim impossible.
In turn, it promotes behaviour patterns of monopolising by the aggressor, at the same time as it generates problems for establishing effective communicative links within the couple and destroys the principles of mutuality and equality that are at the heart of any relationship.
On the other hand, in this pre-marital interaction, there are significant differences and relationships between the considered manifestations of psychological violence. There are certainly such behaviour patterns as disparagement, hostility, lack of affection, coercion, unreasonable demands, blaming and manipulative attitudes present in the relationships of the students studied.
There is also the development of such skills as the subject’s capacity to face potentially stressful situations (“emotiveness”), to adopt objective, optimistic and functional thought patterns (“efficacy”), to show tolerance when faced with frustration (“rigidity”) and to avoid making judgements about reality based on optimism without objective reasons (“illusion”).
However, such data are indicative of such revealing results as the existence of a greater tendency towards psychological violence in its different manifestations by those students with more precarious emotional resources, become even more consistent when the many related studies that act as empirical support are reviewed.
With this work, we aim to contribute to the scientific analysis of psychological violence in the relationships of couples, as well as in the design of primary prevention programmes focused on the development of emotional education as a key tool for establishing full and healthy relationships between couples.
REFERENCES
Tiburcio M, Natera N, Berenzon, S. Utilización de servicios de atención a la salud mental en mujeres víctimas de violencia conyugal. Salud Mental 2010;33:243-248.
Ramos L, Saltijeral MT. ¿Violencia episódica o terrorismo íntimo? Una propuesta exploratoria para clasificar la violencia contra la mujer en las relaciones de pareja. Salud Mental 2008;31:469-478.
Dutton DG. Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2006.
O’Leary KD. Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. Violence Vict 1999;14:1-21.
Echeburúa E, Fernández-Montalvo J, Corral P, López-Goñi JJ. Assessing risk markers in intimate partner femicide and severe violence. A new assessment instrument. J Interpers Violence 2009;24:925-939.
Murphy CM, Morrel TM, Elliott JD, Neavins TM. A Prognostic indicator scale for the treatment of partner abuse perpetrators. J Interpers Violence 2003;18:1087-1105.
Labrador FJ, Fernández-Velasco MR, Rincón P. Características psicopatológicas de mujeres víctimas de violencia de pareja. Psicothema 2010;22:99-105.
Sackett LA, Saunders DG. The impact of different forms of psychological abuse on battered women. Violence Vict 1999;14:105-117.
Schumacher JA, Smith, AM, Heyman RE. Risk factors for child neglect. Aggress Violent Behav 2001;6:231-254.
Street A, Arias I. Psychological abuse and postraumatic stress disorder in battered women: examining the roles of shame and guilt. Violence Vict 2001;16:65-78.
Alonso E, Labrador FJ. Características sociodemográficas y de la violencia de pareja en mujeres maltratadas con trastorno de estrés postraumático: un estudio comparativo de víctimas de diferente nacionalidad. Rev Mex Psicol 2008;25:271-282.
Rincón PP, Labrador FJ, Arinero M, Crespo M. Efectos Psicopatológicos del maltrato doméstico. Av Psicol Latinoam 2004;22:105-116.
Sarasúa B, Zubizarreta I, Echeburúa E, Corral P. Perfil psicopatológico diferencial de las víctimas de violencia de pareja en función de la edad. Psicothema 2007;19:459-466.
Sims CD. Invisible wounds, invisible abuse: The exclusion of emotional abuse in newspaper articles. J Emot Abuse 2008;8:375-402.
Domínguez JM, García P, Cuberos I. Violencia contra las mujeres en el ámbito doméstico: consecuencias sobre la salud psicosocial. An Psicol 2008;24:115-120.
Ellsberg M, Jansen H, Heise L, Watts CH et al. Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet 2008;371:1165-1172.
Pico MA, García MI, Celda N, Blasco C et al. The impact of physical, psychological, and sexual intimate male partner violence on women’s mental health: depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, state anxiety, and suicide. J Womens Health 2006;15:599-611.
Plazaola J, Pérez IR. Violencia contra la mujer en la pareja y consecuencias en la salud física y psíquica. Med Clin 2004;122:461-467.
Ruiz I, Plazaola J. Intimate partner violence and mental health consequences in women attending family practice in Spain. Psychosom Med 2005;67:791-797.
Instituto Andaluz de la Mujer. Violencia contra las mujeres. Ayuntamiento de Puerto de Santa María: Cádiz; 2006.
Faver CA, Strand EB. Fear G, Grief: Harm to pets and the emotional abuse of women. J Emot Abuse 2007;7:51-70.
Faver CA, Strand EB. To Leave or to Stay?: Battered women’s concern for vulnerable pets. J Interpers Violence 2003;18:1367-1377.
Marshall LL. Effects of men’s subtle and overt psychological abuse on low-income women. Violence Vict 1999;14:69-88.
Birchler GR. Differential patterns of instrumental affiliative behavior as a function of degree of marital distress and level of intimacy. DAI 1973;33:14499B-4500B.
Cáceres J. Estudio experimental de la interacción en la pareja. Anál Modif Conduct 1992;18:413-443.
Cáceres J. Violencia doméstica: Lo que revela la investigación básica con parejas. Pap Psicól 2007;28:57-62.
Goleman D. La inteligencia emocional en la empresa. Buenos Aires: Javier Vergara Editor; 1999.
Hué C. La inteligencia emocional y prevención del maltrato de género. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza. II Jornadas sobre violencia familiar, 18 de noviembre; 2004.
Schutte NS, Malouff JM, Bobik C, Coston TD et al. Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. J Soc Psychol 2001;141:523-536.
Csikscentmihalyi M. Fluir. Una psicología de la felicidad. Barcelona: Kairós; 1997.
Fitness J. Emotional intelligence and intimate relationships. En: Ciarrochi J, Forgas JP, Mayer JD (eds.). Emotional intelligence in everyday life: A scientific inquiry. Filadelfia: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis Group; 2001; p.98-112.
Nurius PS, Furrey J, Berliner L. Coping capacity among women with abusive partners. Violence Vict 1992;7:229-243.
Draucker CB, Madsen C. Women dwelling with violence. J Nurs Scholarsh 1999;31:327-332.
Koss MP, Harvey MR. The rape victim: Clinical and community interventions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
Pueyo A, López S, Álvarez, E. Valoración del riego de violencia contra la pareja por medio del SARA. Pap Psicól 2008;29:107-122.
Rodríguez-Caballeira A, Almendros C, Escartín J, Porrúa C et al. Un estudio comparativo de las estrategias de abuso psicológico: en pareja, en el lugar de trabajo y en grupos manipulativos. Anu Psicología 2005;36:299-314.
Straus MA, Gelles RJ. US National family violence survey. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire; 1985.
European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI). International Violence Against Women Survey (IVAWS): Helsinki, Finland; 1993.
McNamara JR, Broker DJ. The abuse disability questionnaire: A new scale for assessing the consequences of partner abuse. J Interpers Violence 2000;15:170-183.
Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 1996;17:283-316.
Hudson W, McIntosh D. The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantificable dimensions. J Marriage Fam 1981;43:873-884.
Matud MP, Caballeira M, Marrero RJ. Validación de un inventario de evaluación del maltrato a la mujer por su pareja: el APCM. Psicopatología Clínica, Legal Forense 2001;1:5-17.
Garner JW, Hudson WW. Non psysical abuse of partner scale (NPAPS); 1992. Disponible en: http://www.walmyr. com/ NPAPSSAM. pdf el 18 de abril de 2005.
Swahnber IM, Wijma B. The NorVold Abuse Questionnaire (NorAQ): validation of new measures of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and abuse in the health care system among women. Eur J Public Health 2003;13:361-366.
Hudson WW. Partner abuse scale: Non physical. Tempe, Arizona: Walmyr Publishing Company; 1990.
Tolman RM. The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence Vict 1989;4:159-178.
Sonkin DJ. Domestic violence: The court mandated perpetrator assessment and treatment handbook. Sausalito, CA: Self published by Daniel Sonkin, Ph.D; 2001.
Epstein S. CTI Inventario de pensamiento constructivo. Madrid: Tea Ediciones; 2001.
Contreras O, Chávez M, Aragón LE, Velázquez M. Estrategias de pensamiento constructivo en estudiantes universitarios. Universitas Psychologica 2011;10:99-111.
Dobash RE, Dobash RP. Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press, Open Books, Shepton Mallet; 1979.
Gottman J, Silver N. Siete reglas de oro para vivir en pareja. Barcelona: Plaza & Janes Editores, S.A; 2001.
Gottman J. The marriage clinic. A scientifically based marital therapy. New York; Norton & Company, Inc.; 1999.
Tapia L. Algunas consideraciones para una Terapia de Pareja basada en la evidencia. Fam Ter 2001;9:7-30.
Gormley B, Lopez FG. Psychological abuse perpetration in college dating relationships: Contributions of gender, stress, and adult attachment orientations. J Interpers Violence 2010;25:204-218.
Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud. Encuesta Nacional de Violencia en las Relaciones de Noviazgo (ENVINOV). México: Secretaría de Educación Pública; 2007.
Echeburúa E, Fernández-Montalvo J. Hombres maltratadores: aspectos teóricos. En: Echeburúa E, Corral P (eds.). Manual de violencia familiar. Madrid: Siglo XXI; 1998.
Echeburúa E, Corral P, Fernández-Montalvo J, Amor PJ. ¿Se puede y debe tratar psicológicamente a los hombres violentos contra la pareja? Pap Psicól 2004;57:10-18.
Bauman EM, Haaga DA, Dutton MA. Coping with intimate partner violence: Battered women’s use and perceived helpfulness of emotion-focused coping strategies. J Aggression, Maltreatment Trauma 2008;17:23-41.
McNulty JK, Hellmuth JC. Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence in newlyweds. J Fam Psychol 2008;22:794-797.
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso D. Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? Am Psychol 2008;63:503-517.
Gohm CL. Mood regulation and emotional intelligence: individual differences. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84:594-607.
Lopes PN, Salovey P, Straus R. Emotional intelligence, personality, and the perceived quality of social relationships. Pers Individ Differ 2003;35:641-658.
Blázquez M. Maltrato psicológico en la pareja y dimensiones de la inteligencia emocional. Estudio de la interacción coactiva en las relaciones de noviazgo de estudiantes universitarios/as. Badajoz: Universidad de Extremadura. Tesis doctoral; 2010.
Marcus RF. Emotion and violence in adolescence. Encyclopedia Violence, Peace, Conflict 2008;672-680.
Full text