Bonnin CE, Urquia MMC

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 128-135
PDF size: 95.30 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Te loss of tissue in the cervical zone has been attributed to the erosion and abrasion provoked by toothbrush. The role of occlusal forces is a very important factor to be taken into account in the development and advance of these carious non-cervical lesions. To distinguish the different mechanical properties and mainly the elasticity module of aesthetic material used for repair of this type of lesion, will allows a great survival of the obturations and in large extent in the treatment of our patients. The aim of present paper was to assess the elasticity module of 6 esthetic restoring materials. Following the ISO 4049 rule 10 test tubes of ach experimental material. A flexion assay of 3 points with INSTRON 4486 was used. From the numerical relation among the tension values (T) and deformation (D) we obtained the elasticity or Young (E) elasticity module for each experimental material. The variance analysis showed significant differences (p < 0.0001) among the different materials. The flow compomers were those with better results in this experimental condition, being the more suitable for repair of lesions of abfraction.

REFERENCES

1. Venturini Pola IA. Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(2):161-8.

2. Cuniberti N. Lesiones cervicales no cariosas y su tratamiento. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent. 2001;89(5):514-26.

3. Grippo J. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:1109-18.

4. Leinfelder K. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compend Edu Cont. 1994;15(11):1396-1400.

5. Cendoya P, Hernández J, Dufeu E. Análisis computacional de lesiones cervicales no cariosas en un premolar superior. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería. 2007;15(2):169-73.

6. Litonjua LA. Non carious cervical lesions and abfractions: a re-evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(7):845-54.

7. Lee N, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosion lesions in tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:374-80.

8. Cuniberti N, Rossi G. Abfracción. La lesión dental del futuro. Parte I. Etiopatogenia y características clínicas. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent. 2007;95 (3):235-42.

9. Organización Internacional de Normalización. ISO 4049. Rein-based filling materials; 1988. Disponible en: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc /catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=23041

10. Urquía Morales MC, Brasca N, Girardi M, Ríos MA. Filtración marginal de restauraciones cervicales con ionómeros híbridos y sellantes. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent. 2001;89(5):459-63.

11. Bresciani E. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12(4):344-8.

12. Loguercio A. Use of flowable composite as intermediary layer in non-carious cervical lesions restored with composite resin: 48-month follow-up. Rev odonto ciênc. 2010;25(2):216-20.

13. Melo FV, Belli R, Monteiro S, Viera LC. Esthetic noncarious class V restorations: a case report. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(5):275-8.

14. Onal B, Parir T. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(11):1547-55.

15. Rodrigues SA Jr. Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of different types of resin-based composites. Braz oral res. 2007;21(1).

16. Santiago SL. Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of Resinous Restorative Systems in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(3):229-34.