medigraphic.com
Coordinación General de Investigación de la Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición y la Dirección General de Sistemas e Informática de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Salud Publica Nutr 2012; 13 (1)

Instrumentos para evaluar el cambio de hábitos relacionados con el control de peso

Villalobos VE, Campos NI, Camarillo G, Enríquez SR

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page:
PDF size: 284.00 Kb.


ABSTRACT

To combat obesity, it is necessary to evaluate the change in eating habits and physical activity in the population. The aim of this paper is to present psychological instruments developed for application in the Mexican population. We used current theories of behavior change and updated nutrition recommendations for the development of questionnaires and psychological instruments that assess behavioral change associated with obesity. Instruments were developed to assess fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, consumption of low fat milk and pure water. The instruments can become a key measurement tool for health professionals dedicated to weight control in Mexico.


REFERENCES

  1. WHO; 1990. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: report of a WHO Study Group. Geneva, World Health Organization.

  2. WHO; 2002. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Geneva, WHO/FAO Expert Consultation.

  3. WHO; 2002. World Health Report 2002. Reducing risk, promoting healthy life. Geneva, World Health Organization.

  4. NOM-043-SSA2-2005. Criterios básicos de salud. Promoción y educación para la salud en materia alimentaria. Criterios para brindar orientación.

  5. SSA; 2010. Acuerdo Nacional para la Salud Alimentaria. Estrategia contra el sobrepeso y la obesidad. S. d. Salud. México, Secretaría de Salud.

  6. Idem.

  7. Zemel, M.B. 2003. Mechanisms of dairy modulation of adiposity. J Nutr. Vol. 133 No. 1:252S-256S.

  8. Scharager, S. 2005. Dietary Calcium intake and Obesity. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. Vol 18 No. 3:205-210.

  9. Peyrot, M., R. R. Rubin, et al. 2005. Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabet Med. Vol 22 No.10: 1379-1385.

  10. Vijan, S., N.S. Stuart, et al. 2005. Barriers to following dietary recommendations in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. Vol.22 No. 1:32-38.

  11. Lancheros L., A. Pava., A. Bohórquez. 2010. Identificación de la adherencia al tratamiento nutricional aplicando el modelo de Conocimientos, Actitudes y Prácticas de personas con Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 atendidas en la asociación Colombiana de Diabetes. DIAETA (B. Aires). Vol. 28 No. 133:17-23.

  12. Johnson, S., M.M. Driskell, et al. 2006. Transtheorical model intervention for adherence to lipid-lowering drugs. Dis Manag. Vol. 9 No. 2:102-114.

  13. Armitage, C.J. 2010. Can variables from the transtheorical model predict dietary change? J Behav Med. Vol 33 No. 4:264-273.

  14. Di Noia, J. y J.O. Prochaska. 2010. Dietaty stages of chance and decisional balance: a meta-analytic review. Am J Health Behav. Vol. 34 No. 5:618-632.

  15. 15. Spahn, J.M., R. S. Reeves, et al. 2010. Stage of the evidence regarding behavior change theories and strategies in nutrition counseling to facilitate health and food behavior change. J Am Diet Assoc. vol. 110 No. 6:879-891.

  16. Prochaska, J.O. y C.C. DiClemente. 1985. Common processes of change of smoking, weight control, and psychological distress. En Coping and Substance Abuse. [S. Shiffman y T. Willis] New York, Academic Press: 345-364.

  17. Prochaska, J.O. y V.W.F. 1997. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. Vol 12:38-48.

  18. Baranowsky, T., C. Perry, et al. 1997. How Individuals, Environments and Health Behavior Interact: Social Cognitive Theory. En Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, research and practice. [K. Glanz y F.M. Lewis] 2a edición, San Francisco, Jossep- Bass. Cap 8:153-178.

  19. Prochaska, J.O. et al. Op. cit.

  20. Idem.

  21. Horacek, T.M. y A. White. 2002. Stages of change for fruit and vegetable intake (Fruit and Vegetable Consumption). Nutrition Research Newsletter Nov 2002: 7. Consultado el 21 de Julio de 2011 [http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?&id=GALE%7CA94763518&v=2.1&u=yazlocation&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w]

  22. Horacek, T.M., A. White, et al. 2002. Self- efficacy perceived benefits and weight satisfaction discriminate among stages of change for fruit and vegetable intakes for young men and women. J Am Diet Assoc. Vol. 102 No. 10:1466-1470.

  23. Schwarzer, R. y B. Renner Health Specific Self-efficacy Scales. Berlin, Freie Universiät. Consultado el 18 de Julio 2011 [http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/healself.pdf ]

  24. WHO; 2003. Fruit and Vegetable Promotion Iniciative. Geneva, World Health Organization:36.

  25. Green, G.W., J.O. Prochaska, et al. 1990. Dietary applications of the stages of change model. J Am Diet Assoc. Vol 99 No.6:673-678.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com