Chacón PWL, Mejía RO, Paredes SJG, Gómez AC

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 53-57
PDF size: 288.91 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to evaluate the impact of PREVENIMSS program, an educational intervention in lifestyle and level of knowledge about self-care of health in men aged between 20 and 59 years. Material and methods: a quasi-experimental research. There were included men aged between 20 and 59 years who signed an informed consent. Prior to the learning style identification it was designed an educational strategy which included the following: 24 sessions, two days per week during three months. It was evaluated the level of knowledge of the PREVENIMSS guide through an instrument expressly developed and validated. Lifestyle was assessed through the instrument Profile of Lifestyle Health Promoter II (PEPS II). The data was analyzed using the Student’s t for related samples, and the statistical significance considered was p‹ of 0.05. Results: the learning style was reflective; and the level of knowledge was significant in all domains, the greatest knowledge was presented in sexual and reproductive health. Significant changes in all domains were observed in the lifestyle: responsibility in health 19.86 ± 1.27 to 25.53 ± 0.87; physical activity 14.53 ± 0.95 to 20.66 ± 0.65; nutrition 20.20 ± 1.26 to 25.33 ± 0.80, spiritual developing 24.93 ± 1.25 to 27.93 ± 0.90, interpersonal relationships of 22.86 ± 1.39 to 27.20 ± 0.90 and management of stress 16.73 ± 0.95 to 21.46 ± 0.73. Conclusions: health education based on the style of learning, modifying the lifestyle.

REFERENCES

1. Muñoz-Hernández O. Programas integrados de salud (prevenimss). Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2006;44(Supl 1):s1-s2.

2. Dueñas-Becerra J. Educación para la salud: bases psicopedagógicas. Rev Cubana Educ Med Sup.1999;13(1):92-8.

3. Díaz-Barriga-Arceo F, Hernández-Rojas G. Constructivismo y aprendizaje significativo. En: Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. Una interpretación constructivista. 2ª ed. México: Mc Graw Hill;1999.

4. Alonso HP, Alonso GC. Procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. En: Los estilos de aprendizaje. Bibao:Mensajero;1994.

5. Benítez-Lima MG. El modelo de diseño instruccional ASSURE aplicado a la educación a distancia. Rev Acad Inv Tlatemoani.2010;(1):1-14.Disponible en: http://www.eumed.net/rev/tlatemoani/o1/mgbl.htm

6. Backhoff-Escudero E, Larrazolo-Reyna N, Morales- Rosas M. Nivel de dificultad y poder de discriminación del Examen de Habilidades y Conocimientos Básicos (exhcoba). Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. 2000;2(1):11-29.

7. Sharon SE, Deborah-LL, James-RM. Facilitar el aprendizaje. En: Tecnología instruccional y medios para el aprendizaje. Ed.Merrill Prentice Hall;2008.p.5-15.

8. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ, Kerrer MJ. A Spanish language version of the Health Promoting Lifestyles Profile. Nurs Res. 1990 sepoct: 39(5);268-73.

9. Jan P. Exam Scores: How to interpret your statistical analysis reports. Arizona State Universitiy. 2004.

10. Morales-Vallejo P. El tamaño del efecto: análisis complementarios al contraste de medias. Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. 2011. Disponible en: http://www.upcomillas.es/personal/peter/investigacion/Tama%F1oDelEfecto.pdf

11. Mejía-Rodríguez O, Gómez-Medina SS, Villa-Barajas R. Estrategias educativas en el control metabólico de pacientes con Diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Aten Fam. 2010;17(2):55-56.

12. Mejía-Rodríguez O, Martínez-Jiménez S, Roa- Sánchez V, Ruiz-García J, Ruiz-Pérez CJ, Pastrana- Huanaco E. Impacto de una estrategia educativa participativa. Ethos Educativo.2008;42:187-196.