medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2011; 30 (1)

Mechanical and cosmetic design of a hand partial prosthesis

Silva CCA, Muñoz RJE, Garzón ADA, Landínez PNS, Silva CO

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 15-41
PDF size: 746.77 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The objective of present paper is the functional and cosmetic solution for a patient with mutilation of second and third hand rays and arthrodesis of the thumb IF in functional position (45°). An individual design of prosthesis constructed according to the own dimensions of patient, whose process was together with patient; the results from Quality Function Deployment (QFD) were analyzed to make changes and improvements in fixation mechanisms and systems also proposed according to the cinematics analysis by mobility simulations in different types of software, implementing a Withworth's double mechanism, which must to be stable and to take advantage of the lacking spaces in the hand; by Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) study we made the self-evaluation of patient. So, it was achieved the satisfaction of patient and a significant recovery of hand motor function, allowing that patient to perform more efficiently activities that before were impossible to perform, improving his quality of life and the way how himself must to face the world.


REFERENCES

  1. Deval J. El desarrollo humano. España: Editorial Siglo XXI; 2008. p. 143-45.

  2. Moore KL. Fundamentos de Anatomía con orientación clínica. 4ta. ed. Editorial Médica Panamericana: 2002. p. 777, 795.

  3. Zapata J. Amputaciones y su tratamiento de rehabilitación. Escuela de rehabilitación humana. Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia.

  4. Touch bionics [homepage on the Internet]. Touch Bionics Inc; c2005-2009 [actualizado 20 Feb 2009; citado 27 Ago 2009]. [aprox. 1 pantalla]. Touch Bionics Prodigits. Disponible en: http://www.touchbionics.co.uk/professionals.php?section=6

  5. Sue Stokes. The first 25 years of Reach. [monografía en Internet]. Reach - The Association for Children with Hand or Arm Deficiency; [citado 25 Ago 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.reach.org.uk/Reachcms/Assetmanager/Images/Files/History.Pdf

  6. Agencia de Noticias BBC [homepage on the Internet]. BBC; c2009 [actualizado 22 Feb 2000; citado 26 Ago 2009]. Mechanical Fingers Give Strength, Speed to Amputees [aprox. 2 pantallas]. Disponible en: http://www.elmundo.es/elmundosalud/2009/02/10/tecnologiamedica/1234285925.html

  7. Wired.com [homepage on the Internet]. Wired.com-Condé Nast Digital.; c2009 [actualizado 07 Feb 2007; citado 22 Ago 2009]. Mechanical Fingers Give Strength, Speed to Amputees [aprox. 3 pantallas]. Disponible en: http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/news/2007/07/xfinger

  8. ScienceDaily [homepage on the Internet]. ScienceDaily LLC; c1995-2009 [actualizado 25 Abr 2008; citado 10 Nov 2009]. New Prosthetic Hand Has Grip Function Almost Like A Natural Hand: Each Finger Moves Separately [aprox. 3 pantallas]. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080422112942.htm

  9. Pons JL, Rocon E, Ceres R. The Manus-Hand* Dextrous Robotics Upper Limb Prosthesis: Mechanical and Manipulation Aspects. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. p. 143-63.

  10. Zambudio R. Prótesis, órtesis y ayudas técnicas. España: Elsevier Masson; 2009. p. 139.

  11. C.M. Gosselin, Laliberte Thierry, US Patent 5762390, June 9, 1998.

  12. T. Laliberte, C.M. Gosselin, Actuation system for highly underactuated gripping mechanism, US Patent 6505870, January 14, 2003.

  13. Light CM, Chappell PH. Development of a lightweight and adaptable multipleaxis hand prosthesis. United Kingdom: Medical Engineering & Physics; 2000. p. 679-84.

  14. Didrick D. Articulated Artificial Finger Assembly, US Patent 6908489 B2, June 21, 2005.

  15. Suárez R, Grosch P. Mano mecánica MA-I. Instituto de Organización y control de Sistemas Industriales (IOC). Barcelona, España: Universidad de Cataluña.

  16. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 5th ed. Canada: Médica Panamericana; 2006. p. 826-28.

  17. Miralles R. Valoración del daño corporal en el aparato locomotor. España: Editorial Elsevier; 2001. p. 159, 175,176.

  18. Rodrigo C, Miralles I, Miralles R. Biomecánica clínica de las patologías del aparato locomotor. España: Elsevier; 2007. p. 111-19.

  19. Rutherford R. Cirugía vascular. 6ta. ed. España: Elsevier; 2006. p. 2489-90.

  20. Viladot R, Riambau O. Ortesis y prótesis del aparato locomotor. España: Elsevier; 2001. p 197-99.

  21. Li Cheng Wu, Carbone G, Ceccarelli M. Designing an underactuated mechanism for a 1 active DOF finger operation. Mechanism and Machine Theory Journal. 2009;44(2):336-348.

  22. Bundhoo Vishalini , J. Edward. Design of an Artificial Muscle Actuated Finger towards Biomimetic Prosthetic Hands. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria. IEEE Journal. 2005.

  23. Bronzino J. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. Taylor & Francis, Third Edition. United States of America: 2006. Section 38-42.

  24. Paolo D, Laschi C, Carrozza MC. An Integrated Approach for the Design and Development of a grasping and manipulation System in humanoid Robotics, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. 2002;556.

  25. Jacobsen SC, Iversen EK, Knutti DF, et al. Design of the utah/mit dextrous hand[A]. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation[C]. San Francisco, CA, USA: 1986. p. 1520-32.

  26. Loucks CS, et al. Modeling and control of the Stanford/JPL hand[A], Proceedings 1987 International Conference on Robotics and Automation[C]. Raleigh, NC: April 1987; 573-78.

  27. OttoBock [homepage on the Internet], [actualizado 2009; citado Sep 12 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.ottobock.com/cps/rde/xchg/ob_com_en/hs.xsl/4848.html

  28. Biagiotti L, Lotti F, Melchiorri C, Vassura G. Mechatronics Design of Innovative Fingers for Anthropomorphic Robot Hands. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. 2003.

  29. Hand Prosthesis Design: Enhancing Grasping Capabilities Through Mechanical Features. Bruno Massa, Scuolasup. Distudi Univ. Eperfezionamentos. Anna Di Pisa, 2002. p. 4.

  30. Revelle J, Moran J, Cox Ch. QFD Handbook. New York, United States of America: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1997. p. 21-35.

  31. Rodríguez L. Diseño: estrategia y táctica. México: Siglo XXI; 2004. p. 14-29.

  32. Zaidi A. QFD, despliegue de la función de calidad. Madrid, España: Díaz de Santos S.A; 1993. p. 124-44.

  33. Torrealba M. Técnica de impresión con alginato y cubeta stock. Curso auxiliar paramédico en odontología. Central odontológica del ejército. Impresiones © 2009 slideshare inc. [Consultado en línea el 10 de noviembre de 2009]. http://www.slideshare.net/mtuchile/anexo-1-impresionespresentation

  34. Norton R. Design of Machinery. United States of America: Editorial McGraw Hill; 1999. p. 22-24. [consultado en línea el 10 de noviembre de 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.scribd.com/doc/10436457/Norton-Design-of-Machinery 35. Tec Laser [homepage on the Internet], Tec Laser S.A. c1998-2009 [actualizado 2009; citado Sep 12 2009]. Tecnología Corte por láser [aproximadamente 2 screens]. Disponible en: http://www.tec-laser.com/public/tecnologia.htm




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com