González OY

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 41-48
PDF size: 346.54 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to design and validate the instrument of observation “Indicators of Nurse Expertise, with the aim of identifying the expertise of the clinical nurse, providing care of interpersonal relationship to hospitalized patients., Methodology: This methodological research was done in several phases: the first involved in the design and development of the instrument, and the second, the process of validity. Content validity was conducted by a panel of four experts and the validity of criterion, a Pearson correlation between the indicators of expert instrument with a sample of 220 nurses was used, with the instrument of Professional Caring behavior. The third phase involved the reliability was performed taking into account trained observers, using a sample of ten nurses and a Cohen’s Kappa agreement test. Results: We obtained a content validity of items between 1 and 0.75 and an overall validity of 0.90. In the reliability, an agreement degree among observers of 90.9% was obtained, r = 0.662. Linear regression with the equation: y = a + bx, where “b” represents the slope, with a value of 0.65 and “a” the intercept, was 13.02. Conclusion: The instrument is convenient to classify nurses, in terms of interpersonal relationship expertise, as presented acceptable psychometric properties. The instrument of observation, “Indicators of Expertise,” predicts professional caring behavior, through a linear relationship.

REFERENCES

1. Arbon P. Understanding Experience. Journal Of Clinical Nursing 2004; 13: 150 -7.

2. Kérouac S. El pensamiento enfermero. Barcelona: Masson; 1996.

3. Fawcett J. Analisis and evaluation of Contemporary nursing knowledge: analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. 2nd edition. U.S.A: Copyright by Davis Company; 2005.

4. Benner P. Práctica progresiva en enfermería. Manual de comportamiento profesional. España: Hurope S.A., traducido por R.A.A. 1987.

5. MarrinerTomey A. Modelos y teorías en enfermería. 5ta edición, España: Mosby/ Doyma, 2003.

6. Fisher AA, Fonteyn, ME. The nature of nursing expertise. In: Grobe, S.J. and Pluyter-Wenting, E.S.P., Editors, 1994. Nursing Informatics: An International Overview of Nursing in a Technological Era, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1994 p. 331-335.

7. Bonner A. Recognition of expertise: an important concept in the Acquisition of nephrology nursing expertise Nursing and health sciences 2003; 5:123 -31.

8. Buller S, Butterworth T. Un estudio cualitativo de los elementos de enfermería International Journal of NursingStudies 2001 38 : 405 – 17.

9. Da Silva, AlcioneLeite. Habilidade intuitiva no cuidado de enfermagen. Revista Latino – Americana Enfermagen. 2003; 11(4): 429 – 35

10. Conway J E. Evolution of the species “expert nurse”. an examination of the practical knowledge held by expert nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1998; 7 (1): 75 - 82 .

11. Meretoja R, Isoaha H, Leino - Kilpi, H. Nurse competence scale: development and psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004; 53 (5) : 347 -52.

12. Polit D Hungler B. Investigación científica en ciencias de la salud. 6a ed. México: Editorial McGraw - Hill Interamericana. S.A. de C.V; 2000. Puntos de indicadores de pericia = 13,02 + 0,65 * (puntos del instrumento de cuidado de comportamiento profesional)

13. Tristán A. Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen de validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo. Avances en medición. 2008; 6(1):37-48.

14. Lawshe CH. A Quantitative approach to content Validity Personnel Psychology1975; 28:563-75 .

15. Watson J. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health science. U.S.A.: Springer Publishing Company; 2002.

16. Horner S. Información sobre la validez y confiabilidad del instrumento de comportamiento de cuidado profesional. Datos no publicados

17. Tristán A. y Vidal R. Manual de fórmulas de correlación. México: Trafford; 2006.