Adefna PIR, Adefna BR, Ramos DN, Izquierdo LFT, Castellanos GJA, Luque LC

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 312-323
PDF size: 193.26 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the stress urinary incontinence is a frequent problem in the female sex with a prevalence of 30 %. Although is not lethal it to provokes a significant impact on the psychic, social and economic spheres for those suffering this disease.
Objective: to demonstrate the chance of performing the trans-obturation subureteral sling procedure with own means without involve the continence and the safety of patient.
Methods: a prospective and descriptive study was conducted to assess the main demographic variables and the impact on the quality of life and the continence according to the Quality of Life Questionnaire scale for patients presenting with a short urinary incontinence.
Results: thirty six patients were operated on with a follow-up of 12 months. The man age is of 51.2 years with predominance of postmenopause and multipara ages. All patients had real or mixed stress incontinence. There was a significant improvement of preoperatory score related to the postoperative one. The yearly success percentage was of 86.1 %. The major complication was the prosthesis erosion and urinary infections. Conclusions: the carrying out of the subureteral sling with prosthesis via transobturation that must to be performed in country in patients con stress or mixed urinary incontinence since it is a real and feasible option achieving continence similar to other techniques, with a minor morbidity and a significant economic saving.

REFERENCES

1. Brown J, Grady D, Ouslander J, Herzog A, Varner R, Posner S. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:66-70.

2. Black N, Bowling A, Griffiths J, Pope C, Abel P. Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on the social lives of women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:605-12.

3. Herzog AR, Fultz NH. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling population. JAGS. 1990;38:273-81.

4. Abha S, Priti A, Nanakram S. Incidence and epidemiology of urinary incontinence in women. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2007;57(2):155-7.

5. Araki I, Beppu M, Kajiwara M, Mikami Y, Zakoji H, Fukasawa M, et al. Prevalence and impact on generic quality of life of urinary incontinence in japanese working women: assessment by ICI questionnaire and sf-36 health survey. Urology. 2005;66:88-93.

6. Thom DH, Nygaard IE, Calhoun EA. Urologic Diseases in America Project: urinary incontinence in women-national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment and economic impact. J Urol. 2005;173:1 295.

7. Milson I, Altman D, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillen U. Epidemiology of faecal and urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 4th ed. Plymouth: Health Publication Ltd; 2009. p. 35-112.

8. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección Nacional de Registros Médicos y estadísticas de salud. Anuario estadístico de salud, 2009. La Habana; 2009.

9. Sandvik H, Espuña M, Hunskaar S. Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:520-4.

10. Okorocha I, Cumming G, Gould I. Female urodynamics and lower urinary tract infection. BJU Int. 2002;89(9):863-7.

11. Hampel C, Artibani ME, Haab F, Jackson S, Romero J, Gavart S, et al. Understanding the Burden of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Europe: A Qualitative Review of the Literature. Eur Urol. 2004;46:15-27.

12. Jundt K, Wagner S, von Bodungen V, Friese K, Peschers UM. Occult incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse- Does it matter? Eur J Med Res. 2010;15(3):112-6.

13. Karateke A, Tug N, Cam C, Asoglu MR, Selcuk S. Concomitant surgical correction of occult stress urinary incontinence by TOT in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010. (ahead of print)

14. Donovan JL, Ruud Bosch JLH, Gotoh M, Jackson S, Naughton M,Radley S, Valiquette L. Symptom and quality of life assessment. En: 54 informes, estudios e investigación. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (editores). Incontinence: 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publication Ltd.; 2005. p. 519-84.

15. Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P. Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and metaanalysis of effectiveness and complications. BJU Int. 2010;106(1):68-76.

16. Hinoul P, Jan-Paul R, Ombelet W, Vanspauwen R. Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence in women: A historical and clinical overview. Europ J of Obst Gyn Rep Biol. 2009;145:219-25.

17. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD006375.

18. Castillón Vela I. Cirugía de la incontinencia urinaria femenina en régimen de cirugía mayor ambulatoria: estudio de impacto presupuestario. Arch Esp Urol. 2007;60(3):632-4.

19. Navarro M, Tagle R, Chiang S, Zegpi R. Resultados de la técnica TOT con anestesia peridural en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo. Rev Chil Urol. 2005;70(4):214-21.

20. Donoso M, González JA, Danilla SE. Cinta suburetral transobturatriz (TOT) en la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo: continencia a mediano plazo y evolución de los síntomas irritativos vesicales. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2007;72(6):366-73.

21. Briozzo L, Vidiella G, Curbelo F, Craviotto F, Massena B, López R, et al. Transvaginal Obturatriz Tape (TOT) en el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo femenina. Rev Med Uruguay. 2005;21:130-40.