medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2011; 21 (1)

Imagenology in cosmetic breast surgery

Lara TMC, Olmedo ZÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 20-38
PDF size: 776.12 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Cosmetic breast surgery is an important part of the clinical practice of plastic and reconstructive surgeons. It increased as restrictions on the use of mammary prosthesis for cosmetic purposes were withdrawn. The frequency of breast cancer has increased substantially in the world and is alarming in the developing countries, such as ours. It should also be considered that not malignant breast disease occurs in a high proportion of patients who are or will be undergoing cosmetic procedures, since the age surgeries are performed ranges from adolescence to maturity. The early diagnosis of breast cancer should be performed by means of image, particularly mammography, allowing early detection. To be helped by other studies of image, accurate diagnoses of pathology that occurs or concurs in the breast is achieved, before or after mammary cosmetic procedures, as well as of their complications and sequelae. The experience of 27,875 mammographies and analysis of their results are presented.


REFERENCES

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2000-2008 Plastic surgery statistics cosmetic reconstructive procedure trends. 2009.

  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (Center for devices and radiological health). Slicone gell-filled breast implants. 2006.

  3. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Abraham LA, Taplin SH, Dignan M, Cutter G, Ballard-Barbash R. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138(3): 168-75. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 2003; 138(9): 771.

  4. Bartella L, Smith CS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Imaging breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45(1): 45-67.

  5. Knaul FE, López CL, Lazcano PE, Gómez DH, Romieu I, Torres G. Cáncer de mama: un reto para la sociedad y los sistemas de salud. Salud Pública de México 2009; 51(Supl 2): S138-40.

  6. Perry N, Broeders M, De Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, Von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition-summary document. Ann Oncol 2008; 19(4): 614-22.

  7. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-041-SSA2-2002. Para la prevención, diagnóstico, tratamiento, control y vigilancia epidemiológica del cáncer de mama. Secretaría de Salud. Diario Oficial de la Federación 2003.

  8. Lara TMC, Olmedo ZA, Hernández GM. Imagen en implantes mamarios. Rev Mex Radiol 1998: 52(1): 3-11.

  9. American College of Radiology (ACR) ACR BI-RADS- mammography. 4th ed. In ACR Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging Atlas. Reston Va 2003.

  10. Sankanarayanan R, Boffeta P. Research on cancer prevention, detection and management in low- and medium-income countries. Ann Oncol 2010; 21(10): 1935-43.

  11. Planche K, Vinnicombe S. Breast imaging in the new era. Cancer Imaging 2004; 4(2): 39-50.

  12. Lewin JM, D’Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. Digital mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42(5): 871-84, vi.

  13. Hulvat MC, Hansen NM, Jeruss JS. Multidisciplinary care for patients with breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2009; 89(1): 133-76, ix.

  14. Hashimoto BE, Morgan GN, Kramer DJ, Lee M. Systematic approach to difficult problems in breast sonography. Ultrasound Q 2008; 24(1): 31-8.

  15. Enriquez L, Listinsky J. Role of MRI in breast cancer management. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76(9): 525-32.

  16. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, Smith RA, Warner E, Yaffe M, Andrews KS, Russell CA; American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57(2): 75-89.

  17. Pfeiderer B, Heindel W. MRI and MR spectroscopy after silicone breast implants in female breast. Rofo 2001; 173(7): 571-9.

  18. Alberini JL, Lerebours F, Wartski M, Fourme E, Le Stanc E, Gontier E, Madar O, Cherel P, Pecking AP. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging in the staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer 2009; 115(21): 5038-47.

  19. MacDonald L, Edwards J, Lewellen T, Haseley D, Rogers J, Kinahan P. Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II. J Nucl Med 2009; 50(10): 1666-75.

  20. Lara MC, Hernández M, Olmedo A. Correlación entre la mastografía y sonografía con el examen clínico. Mamografía Intervención e Imagen. Ed. Venta L. Colección Radiología e Imagen Diagnóstica y Terapéutica. Ed. Taveras JA. Philadelphia, Pa. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2000; 17: 291-314.

  21. American Cancer Society. Detailed Guide: Breast Cancer 2009. Available at: www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/CRI_2_3x.asp?dt=5. Accessed September 22, 2009.

  22. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR Am J Roentgen 1988; 151(3): 469-73.

  23. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JW, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Bindman R, Yankaskas BC. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 2005; 235(3): 775-90.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com