Eficacia de la biopsia transrectal guiada por ultrasonido con técnica extensa

Yesenia Reyes Godínez; Martha Castro Ibarra; Guadalupe Guerrero Avendaño

2009, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2009; 8 (2)

Eficacia de la biopsia transrectal guiada por ultrasonido con técnica extensa

Reyes GY, Castro IM, Guerrero AG

Full text

How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 177-181
PDF size: 241.47 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Demonstrating the efficacy that trans-rectal echo-directed prostatic biopsy sample with extensive technique has, obtaining from seven to ten samples through lobe by mapping and directed to nodular lesions.
Material and methods: A 114 patients-retrospective study were submitted to prostatic trans-rectal biopsy echo-directed with said technique, referred to Urology Service by presence, of specific prostatic antigen higher than 4 ng/dL with or without rectal suspicious tact.
Results: Prostate cancer in 35.08% of patients, from which, the group of bigger incidence is included between the 61 and 70 years old (47.2%) and with a prostatic specific antigen between 10 and 33 ng/dL (45.1%).
Conclusion: Diagnostic classical sextant biopsy performance has been overcome by extended biopsy techniques and the used in our series shows itself to be an acceptable procedure to increase prostate cancer detection.

REFERENCES

Wanabe H, Kato H, Kato T, et al. Diagnostic application of the ultrasoundtomography for the prostate. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1968; 59: 273-9.
Lee F. Torp-Pedersen ST, Siders DB. The role of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1989; 39: 337-60.
Hodge KK, Mc NealJE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of de prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 71-4.
Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995; 45: 2.
Terris MK, Wallen EM, Stamey TA. Comparison of mid-lobe versus lateral systematic sextant method for the diagnosis carcinoma of the prostate. Urol In T 1997; 59: 239.
Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 159: 471.
Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Waldbaum RS, et al. The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. Urology 1995; 46: 831.
Karakiewicz PI, Bazinet M, Aprikian AG, et al. Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. Urology 1997; 49: 55.
Letran JL, Meyer GE, Loberiza FR, et al. The effect of prostate volumen on the yield of needle biopsy. J Urol 1998; 160: 1718.
Eskew LS, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosis carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199.
Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K, et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000; 163: 152.
Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 2001; 166: 86.
De la Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomón L, et al. Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improved the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2003; 61: 1181.
Arzoz FM, Areal CJ, Ibarz SL, et al. Neoplasia intraepitelial prostática aislada y positividad para adenocarcinoma en la rebiopsia. Revisión de nuestra serie. Actas Urol Esp 2005; 29(8): 735-8.