medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2007, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2007; 67 (3)

Desarrollo de modelos biológicos inanimados en urología

Márquez Heine JC, Vázquez Ortega L, Ramírez Solís E, Morales Montor G, Pacheco Gahbler C, Calderón Ferro F

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 147-153
PDF size: 296.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: The heuristic teaching method has been the classical training program. Unfortunately in the United States at least 98 thousand deaths and in our country 15% of the complications can be attached to this training program.
Objective: To develop a low cost, reproducible human-like teaching program that can help to develop urological surgical abilities.
Materials and methods: A hollow torso made of fiberglass was covered with high density polyurethane. Under this cover 60 light leads, using a Simulap® 0 degree laparoscopic lens.
Results: The technical and surgical characteristics were simulated for the appropriate development of the surgical abilities.
Conclusions: The combined use of plastic simulators with biological models gives the medical student the ability to diminish the learning curve developed in human beings.


REFERENCES

  1. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. The educational impact of Bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical Skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg. 2004;240 (2):374-81.

  2. Adamsen S. Simulators and gastrointestinal endoscopy training. Endoscopy. 2000;32(11):895-7.

  3. Bar-Meir S. A New endoscopic simulator. Endoscopy. 2000;32(11):898-900.

  4. Williams CB, Saunders BP, Bladen JS. Development of colonoscopy teaching simulation. Endoscopy. 2000;32(11):901-5.

  5. Neumann M, Mayer G, Ell C, Felzmann T, et al. The Erlangen endo-trainer: Life-like simulation for diagnostic and interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy. 2000;32(11):906-10.

  6. Aabakken L. et al. Performance of a colonoscopic simulator: experience from a hands-on endoscopy course. Endoscopy. 2000;32(11):911-913.

  7. Conio M, Sorbi D, Batts KP, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic circumferential esophageal mucosectomy in a porcine model : An Assessment of a technical feasibi-lity, safety and outcome. Endoscopy. 2000;32(11):966-970.

  8. Teague R H. Can we teach colonoscopic skills? Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:112-114.

  9. Cass O W, Freeman ML, Peine CJ, et al. Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:40-4.

  10. Bowles CJ, et al. Intercollegiate British Society of Gastroenterology national colonoscopy (ISBN) audit: are colonoscopies supervised during their initial training? Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:AB-73.

  11. British Society of Gastroenterology. Recommendations for training in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. http://www. Bsg.org.uk/training/jag99.html,1999.

  12. Laguna, M. Pilar A, Hatzinger, Martin B, Rassweiler, Jens B. Simulators and endourological training. Urological surgery, surgical techniques, technology. Current Opinionin Urology. 2002;12(3):209-215.

  13. Abstracts from Engineering and Urology Society. San Antonio, Texas. Journal of Endourology. 2005; 19(7):899-921.

  14. Dumitru M, Alexandru P, Lucian G. Synthetic Torso for Training in and Evaluation of Urologic Laparoscopic Skills. Journal of Endourology. 2006;20(5):340-345.

  15. Dauster B, Steinberg AP, Vassiliou BC, Bergman S, et al. Validity of the MISTELS Simulator for Laparoscopy Training in Urology. J Endourol. 2005;19(5):541-5.

  16. Clark JA, Volchok JA, Hazey JW, Sadighi PJ, Fanelli Ranelli RD. Initial experience using an endoscopic simulator to train surgical residents in flexible endoscopy in a community medical center residency program. Curr Surg. 2005;62(1):59-63.

  17. Watterson JD, Beiko DT, Kuan JK, Denstedt JD. Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquisition of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator. J Urol. 2002;168(5):1928-32.

  18. Knoll T, Trojan L, Haecker A, Alken P, Michel MS. Validation of computer-based training in ureterorenoscopy. BJU Int. 2005;95(9):1276-9.

  19. Wilhelm DM, Ogan K, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195(5):675-81.

  20. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, Cakmak HK, Kuehnapfel UG, Germer CT. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg. 2005;241(3):442.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com