medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)

2010, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2010; 20 (3)

Instrument for evaluating and grading the damage produced by the infiltration of modeling subs

Torres GB, Burgos VR, Medrano RG, Priego BRB

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 105-111
PDF size: 238.57 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Currently human disease caused by the infiltration of modeling substances has become a frequent problem. The manifestations of the disease and the degree of damage are so varied and imprecise that is necessary to have a classification system that permits identification of the stage of the disease for every patient before treatment to infer their long-term prognosis. The objective of this work was to create an instrument to assess the damage caused by the infiltration of substances for modeling purposes to classify the degree of disease. We carried out a clinimetric study from December 2004 to December 2008 in the Plastic Surgery and Rheumatology wards of the General Hospital of Mexico. A systematic extensive review of the literature on the clinical manifestations of the disease related to the infiltration of some modeling substances was made and later clinical measurement and laboratory variables were described with more frequency, as well as the events of interest in other studies which were selected and gro uped in domains according to their usefulness for evaluation. A group of national and foreign experts of different specialties selected the most meaningful disease variables to configure the instrument of evaluation and staging of the damage. Finally the instrument was validated with patients with this disease before and after the study. We have a tool to classify the degree of affectation of the disease by modeling which will permit the proposal of well-directed therapeutic strategies in concordance with the condition of each patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Rees T, Platt J, Ballantyne D. An investigation of cutaneous response to dimethylpolysiloxane (silicone liquid) in animals and humans – A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 35: 131-139.

  2. Ballantyne D, Rees T, Seidman I. Response to massive subcutaneous injections of dimethylpolysiloxane fluid in animals. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 330-338.

  3. Ben-Hur N, Ballantyne D, Rees T, Seidman I, Local and systemic effect of dimethylpolysiloxane fluid in mice. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 39: 423-426.

  4. Rees T, Ballantyne D, Seidman I, Hawthorne G. Visceral response to subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injections of silicone in mice. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 39: 402-10.

  5. Adler A, Etzion Z, Berlyne G. Uptake, distribution and excretion of silicon in normal rats. Am Phys Soc 1986: E670-E673.

  6. Menezes RC, Tiziani V, Cintra L, Amstalden I, Badan PF. Local reaction and migration of injected silicone gel: Experimental study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993; 17: 335-338.

  7. Pietra G, Jiménez S, Daniele R. Experimental silicosis. Am Assoc Pathol 1980; 101: 595-607.

  8. Boo-Chal K. Parafinoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 101-110.

  9. McDowell F. Complications with silicones – What grade of silicones how do we know in was silicones. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61: 892-895.

  10. Travis W, Balagh K, Abraham J. Silicone granulomas: Report of three cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 1985; 16: 19-27.

  11. Blocksma R, Braley S. The silicones in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 35: 366-370.

  12. Rae Y, Pardo R, Blackwelder P. Leg ulcers following subcutaneous injections of a liquid silicone preparation. Arch Dermatol 1989; 125: 670-673.

  13. Wilkie T. Late development of granuloma after liquid silicone injections. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 60: 179-188.

  14. Chastre J, Bouchama A, Basset F, Acute pneumonitis after subcutaneous injections of silicone in transsexual men. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 764-767.

  15. Kircher T. Silicone lymphadenopathy. Hum Pathol 1980; 11: 240-244.

  16. Pearl R, Laub D, Kaplan E. Complications following silicone injection for augmentation of the contours of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61: 888-891.

  17. Ashley F, Braley S, Rees T et al. The present status of silicone fluid in soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 39: 411-420.

  18. Ortiz-Monasterio F, Trigos I. Management of patients with complications from injections of foreign material in to the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 50: 42-47.

  19. Miyoshi K, Miyaoka T, Kobayashi Y, Itahura T, Nishijo K, Higashitara M, Shiragami H, Ohno F. Hypergammaglobulinemia by prolonged adjuvancy in man: disorder developed after augmentation mammoplasty. Ijishimpo 1964; 2122: 9-14.

  20. Brozena S, Fenske N, Cruse W, Espinosa C et al. Human adjuvant disease following augmentation mammoplasty. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124: 1383-1386.

  21. Sanchez-Guerrero J, Schur P, Sergent J, Liang M. Silicone breast implants and rheumatic disease. Arthritis and Rheum 1994; 37: 158-168.

  22. Wustrack K, Zarem H. Surgical management of silicone mastitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 224-229.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com