2010, Number 5
Comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orlistat vs placebo in adult patients in Mexico City
Camacho TR, Lago AA, González PM, Parada TMG
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 437-448
PDF size: 503.68 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: In Mexico the prevalence of overweight and obesity have reached epidemic proportions have increased to the point of costs care for health problems associated with the impact of overweight and obesity.Objective: assess efficacy and safety of Orlistat 60 mg three times daily, with low calorie diet and exercise vs. placebo, diet and exercise.
Material and method: A placebo controlled, double blind, randomized and longitudinal (12 week) study; 240 patients of both genders, over 18 years of age, with body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 34.9 kg/m² were included. Variables of efficacy: 1) ≥10% reduction in weight and BMI; 2) Reduction or maintenance of cholesterol and triglycerides; 3) ≥10% reduction of body fat by bioelectric impedance. Safety variable: evaluation of adverse events (AE).
One hundred and nineteen subjects were randomized in group A (orlistat) and 121 in group B (placebo); 105 subjects in group A and 95 in group B finished, and were considered for the variables of efficacy; all 240 subjects were taken into account to assess safety.
Results: ≥10% weight and BMI reduction: group A 34.29%; group B 8.42%, (p≤0.0001). ≤10% reduction of body fat with bioelectric impedance: group A 70.19%; group B 28.42% (p≤0.0001). Reduction of triglycerides: group A dropped 18.45 mg/dL (p=0.008); in group B the difference was -3.22 mg/dL (gain) (p= 0.6041). Reduction of cholesterol: group A dropped 19.87 mg/dL (p= ‹0.0001); group B dropped 9.75 mg/dL (p=0.0040). AEs with frequency ≥10% in group A were steatorrhea, diarrhea, fatty rectal drip, and meteorism.
Conclusion: The goal of losing ≥10% of weight or body fat was greater for subjects in group A and combined with diet and exercise proved to be more effective and safe and much faster.
REFERENCES