2011, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2011; 25 (1)
CT scan evaluation of the syndesmotic diastasis in AO/OTA B and C ankle fractures
Paredes-Vázquez R, Sesma-Villalpando RA, Herrera-Tenorio G, Romero-Ogawa T
Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 32-38
PDF size: 579.81 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: There are anatomical variants of the tibiofibular syndesmosis that lead to changes in the radiographic criteria applied to its injury.
Objective: To determine the syndesmotic diastasis using CAT scan in B and C (AO/OTA) ankle fractures and relate the anatomical variants of the tibial incisure with the separation from the fibula.
Material and methods: Comparative, cross-sectional and prolective screening that included all patients with B and C (AO/OTA) ankle fractures who completed their X-ray and CAT scan assessment. The radiographic parameters included the tibiofibular clearance, tibiofibular overlapping and the internal clearance. The length, depth and shape of the tibial incisure were measured with CAT scan. The statistical method used was the χ
2.
Results: The total number of patients was 17: 8 females (47%) and 9 males (53%), with a mean age of 41 years. Fourteen (82%) had a syndesmotic fracture and 3 had suprasyndesmotic fractures. The CAT scan found 10 concave incisures, 4 irregular and 3 flat ones. The mean depth of the incisure was 2.82 ± 0.89 mm, and the mean width was 22.18 ± 3.04. No syndesmotic diastasis was detected radiographically in 6 cases (35.2%); the CAT scan only detected 3 of them (17.7%). The diagnosis of syndesmotic diastasis was made with plain X-rays in 11 cases (64.8%) and with CAT scan in 14 (82.3%) (p = 0.043).
Conclusion: The X-rays are questionable to define the syndesmotic diastasis, so the CAT scan should be considered in cases of a doubtful diagnosis.
REFERENCES
Rockwood and Green´s: Fracturas en el adulto Vol. 3 Ed. Marbán 5ta ed. España 2003: 2001-87.
Canale TS: Cirugía ortopédica de Campbell Vol. III Ed. Elsevier 10ª Ed. España 2005: 2726-40.
Chang JT: Técnicas en cirugía de pie y tobillo. Ed. Marbán. España 2006: 529-44.
Hilmi MH, Bicimoglu A, Celebi L, Boyagli S, Damgaci L, Yalcun TA: Magnetic resonance arthrographic evaluation of syndesmotic diastasis in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; (125): 222-7.
Vogl TJ, Hochmut K, Diebold T, Lubrich J, Hofman R, Ulrich S, Oliver S, Sussane B, Sudkamp N, Roland F: Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute injured distal tibiofibular sindesmosis. Investigative Radiol 1997; 32(7): 401-9.
Jenkinson RJ, Sanders DW, McLeod MD, Domonkos A, Lydestat J: Intraoperative diagnosis of syndesmosis injuries in external rotation ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 82: 843-8.
Zalavras Ch, Thordason D: Lesiones sindesmales de tobillo. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (Edición en Español), 2007; 6(5): 10-9.
Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H: MRI Findings associated with distal tibiofibular sindesmosis injury. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 131-6.
Takao M, Ochi M, Oae K, Naito K, Uchio Y: Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular sindesmosis: The role of arthroscopy of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85B: 324-9
Nielson HJ, Gardner JM, Peterson GEM, Sallis GJ, Potter GH, Helfet LD, Lorich GD: Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2005; 436: 216-21.
Beumer A, Van Hermert WLW, Niesing R, Entius CAC, Ginai ZA, Mulder HGP, Swierstra AB: Radiographic measurement of the distal tibiofibular sindesmosis has limited use. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004; 423: 227-34
Harper MC, Keller TS: A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular sindesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 1989; 10: 156-60.
Ebraheim N, Jike MD, Yang H, Rollis J: The fibular incisure o the tibia on CT scan: a cadaver study. Foot and Ankle Inter 1998; 19(5): 318-21.
Ebraheim N, Lu J, Yang H Mekhail A, Yeasting R: Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot and Ankle Inter 1997; 18(11): 693-8.
Brage M, Bennet C, Whitehurst J, Patrick JG, Toledano A: Observer reliability in ankle radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int 1997; 18(6): 324-9.
Taser F, Toker S, Klincoglu V: Evaluation of morphometric characteristics of the fibular incisures on dry bones. Joint Dis Rel Surg 2009; 20(1): 52-8.
Elgafy H, Semaan B, Blessinger B, Wassef A: Computed tomography of normal distal tibiofibular sindesmosis. Skeletal Radiol 2009: 256.
Hocker K, Pachucki A: The tibiofibular incisures of the tibia. The cross-sectional position of the fibula in distal sindesmosis. Unfallchirurg 1989; 92: 401-6.
Ebraheim AN, Elgafy H, Padalinan T: Syndesmotic disruption in low fibular fractures associated with deltoid ligament injury. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2003; 409: 260-7.
Yildrim H, MAvi A, Büyükbecei O: Evaluation of the fibular incisures of the tibia with magnetic resonance imaging. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24: 387-91.
Koval JK, Egol AK, Cheung Y, Goodwin WD, Spratt FK: Does a positive ankle stress test indicate the need for operative treatment after lateral malleoulus fracture? A Preliminary Report J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21(7): 449-55.
Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H: MRI Findings associated with distal tibiofibular sindesmosis injury. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 131-6.
Nielson HJ, Sallis GJ, Potter GH, et al: Correlation of the interosseous membrane tears to the level of the fibular fracture. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 68-74.
Pneumatikos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, Trevino SG: The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular sindesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 107-11.
Mavi A, Yildrim H, Gunes H, Pestamalci T, et al: The fibural incisures of the tibia with recurrent sprained ankle on magnetic resonance imaging. Saudi Med J 2002; 23: 845-9.
Harper MC: An anatomic and radiologic investigation of the tibiofibular clear space. Foot Ankle Int 1993; 14: 455-8.
Xenos SJ, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, et al: The tibiofibular sindesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77A: 847-56.
Sora MC, Strobl B. Staykov D, Förster-Streffleur S: Evaluation of the ankle sindesmosis; a plastination slices study. Clin Anat 2004; 17: 13-7.
Wuest KT: Injuries to the distal lower extremity syndesmosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1997; 5: 172-81.