Muñoz-Enciso JM, Rosales-Aujang E, Domínguez-Ponce G, Serrano-Díaz CL

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 67-74
PDF size: 830.37 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Caesarean section is the most common surgery performed in all hospitals of second level of care in the health sector and more frequently in private hospitals in Mexico.
Objective: To determine the behavior that caesarean section in different hospitals in the health sector in the city of Aguascalientes and analyze the indications during the same period.
Material and method: A descriptive and cross in the top four secondary hospitals in the health sector of the state of Aguascalientes, which together account for 81% of obstetric care in the state, from 1 September to 31 October 2008. Were analyzed: indication of cesarean section and their classification, previous pregnancies, marital status, gestational age, weight and minute Apgar newborn and given birth control during the event.
Results: were recorded during the study period, 2.964 pregnancies after 29 weeks, of whom 1.195 were resolved by Caesarean section with an overall rate of 40.3%. We found 45 different indications, which undoubtedly reflect the great diversity of views on the institutional medical staff to schedule a cesarean section.
Conclusions: Although each institution has different resources and a population with different characteristics, treatment protocols should be developed by staff of each hospital to have the test as a cornerstone of labor, also request a second opinion before a caesarean section, all try to reduce the frequency of cesarean section.

REFERENCES

1. Organización Mundial de la Salud: Estadísticas sanitarias mundiales 2009. Tabla 4:71-81.

2. Ahued AJR, Quesnel GBC, Simon PLA. Parto y cesárea. Programa de Actualización Continua en Ginecología y Obstetricia. PAC-GO-1. 1a ed. México: Intersistemas, 1998;3:28-41.

3. Juárez OS, Fajardo GA, Pérez PG, Guerrero MR, Gómez DA. Tendencia de los embarazos terminados por operación cesárea en México durante el periodo 1991-1995. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1999;67:308-318.

4. Quesnel GBC, Lira PJ, Ibargüengoitia OF, Aguayo GP y col. Operación cesárea: ¿ciencia o ansiedad? Once años de experiencia institucional. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1997;65:247-253.

5. Guzmán IMA, Ablanedo AJ, Basavilvazo RM, Martínez RO, Ahumada RE. ¿Se justifica la alta frecuencia de la cesárea en un hospital gineco-obstétrico de alta especialidad? Ginecol Obstet Mex 2003;71:291-296.

6. Cabeza GE, Delgado LA, Morales OA, Pérez PG. Comportamiento de la cesárea en la SSA durante el periodo 1990-1995. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1998;66:335-338.

7. Villanueva ELA. Operación cesárea: una perspectiva integral. Rev Fac Med UNAM 2004;47:246-250.

8. Zárate PL. ¿Cesárea innecesaria? Rev Inst Med Sucre 1996;61:51-58.

9. Puentes RE, Gómez DO, Garrido LF. Las cesáreas en México: tendencias, niveles y factores asociados. Salud Pub Mex 2004;46:16-22.

10. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Dirección de Prestaciones Médicas. Lineamiento Técnico Médico para la atención obstétrica durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio. 2006;p:306-308.

11. Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Salud Reproductiva. Cesárea segura. Lineamiento técnico. 2002;p:15-16.

12. Rosales AE, Felguérez FJA. Influencia de la operación cesárea en la planificación familiar. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2009;77(12):562-566.

13. Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico. Recomendaciones generales para mejorar la calidad de la atención obstétrica. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2004;72:295-331.