medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2008; 53 (4)

Frequency of adhesions in patients requiring tympanoplasty

Espino ML, Hernández VG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 143-147
PDF size: 302.66 Kb.


Key words:

tympanoplasty, adhesions.

ABSTRACT

Background: The adhesions in the chronic infected ear are well known by the ear surgeon in spite of the fact that information about their etiology, pathogenesis and meaning is very poor. These cause a fibrous fixation of the eardrum and osicular chain promoting a hearing loss and a failure of the ear mucociliar clearance. The ideal packing of the middle ear in the ear surgery has to give temporal support and stability for the graft and the osicular chain while it has an appropriate healing and a fibrous joint.
Objective: To identify the adhesions frequency and the related features at the surgical findings of the revision tympanoplasties at the Juarez Hospital of Mexico and to have a valid national reference to assess the treatment effect that look for to reduce the formation of the post-surgery adhesions in the middle ear.
Material and methods: The files of the patients who underwent to revision tympanoplasty from 2003 to 2007 were reviewed, analyzing the surgical findings and the most related features.
Results: There were a total of 49 patients, 47 underwent to two surgeries in the same ear, and only two patients required three procedures. Thirty six patients (73.4%) had adhesions and the most common features were tympanic perforation, otorrhea, and cholesteatoma.
Conclusions: The frequency of the post surgery adhesions was in a high percentage, therefore it is important to find an adequate material for packing that aids to prevent the formation of these.


REFERENCES

  1. Cummings CW, Fredickson JM, Harper LA, Krause CJ, et al. Otolaryngology head and neck surgery. 3th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998.

  2. Glasskock M, Gulya A. Surgery of the ear. 5th ed. Ontario: BC Decker Inc., 2003.

  3. Bailey BJ, Thonson JT, Newlands SD, Calhoun KH, Deskin RW. Head and neck surgery-otolaryngology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.

  4. Lalwani AK. Current diagnosis and treatment in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.

  5. Cayé-Thomasen P, Hermansson, A, Tos M, Prellner K. Pathogenesis of middle ear adhesions. Laryngoscope 1996;106(4):463-9.

  6. Joseph R. The effect of absorbable gelatin sponge preparations an other agents on scar formation in the dog’s middle ear. An experimental histopathologic study. Laryngoscope 1962;72:1528-48.

  7. Sheehy J. Plastic sheeting in tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1973;83(7):1144-59.

  8. Krupala J. The efficacy of hyaluronic acid foam as a middle ear packing agent in experimental tympanoplasty Am J Otology 1998;19(5):546-50.

  9. Patterson C. Silastic sponge implants in tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1968;78(5):759-67.

  10. Bagger-Sjöback D, Holmquist J, Mendel L, Mercke U. Hyaluronic acid in middle ear surgery. Am J Otology 1993;14(5):501-50.

  11. Sheehy J. Tympanoplasty: Staging the operation. Laryngoscope 1973;83(10):1594-621.

  12. Moore G. Revision Tympanoplasty Utilizing FossaTriangularis Cartilage. Laryngoscope 2002;112(9):1543-54.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Otorrinolaringología. 2008;53