2010, Number 10
Comparison of laparoscopic vs. laparotomy treatment in ovarian teratomas
Briones-Landa CH, Ayala-Yáñez R, Leroy-López L, Anaya-Coeto H, Santarosa-Pérez MÁ, Reyes-Muñoz E
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 527-532
PDF size: 228.33 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Benign cystic teratoma is one of the most common benign tumors of the ovary, according to international series represents between 44 and 62% of all ovarian tumors diagnosed in women younger than 40 years.Objectives: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety between laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of ovarian teratomas, as well as the recurrence between both techniques.
Materials and method: Retrospective, clinical series study involving 169 cases of ovarian teratomas operated at the Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes in the period comprehended between 2000-2008. The cases were divided into the ones solved by laparoscopy, corresponding to group 1 (102 cases) and 67 cases solved by laparotomy, corresponding to group 2.
Results: Group 1 (laparoscopic approach) consisted of 102 patients (60.3%), and group 2 (laparotomy approach) had 67 patients (39.7%). Surgical bleeding: 55.7 ± 21.4 mL vs. 91.6 ± 29.2 mL (p ‹ 0.0001), hospital stay: 1.6 ± 0.57 vs. 2.7 ± 0.42 days (p ‹ 0.0001), surgical time: 110.3 ± 27.2 vs. 83.6 ± 26.9 minutes (p ‹ 0.0001), teratoma size: 7.2 ± 2.3 vs. 11.5 ± 4.2 cm (p ‹ 0.0001) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Teratoma rupture had 57.8% incidence (59 cases) in group 1, and 16.4% in group 2 (11 cases). Laparoscopy was a risk factor for broken open for ovarian cyst (OR: 6.9; CI 95%: 3.3-14.8). Not a single case was complicated by chemical peritonitis in any study group.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic approach to teratomas is a safe and efficient procedure, it does not increase complications in comparison to the laparotomy approach; it presents less bleeding and short hospital stay, offering a quick recovery.
REFERENCES