Torres-Gómez A, Pérez-Salazar-Marina D, Cassis-Zacarías N

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 15-18
PDF size: 136.76 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Clubfoot is one of the most common musculoskeletal malformations; the prevalence has been reported between 0.57 and 6.8 per 1,000 live births. The prevalence of clubfoot in Mexico was not previously studied. We sought to find out what is the prevalence of clubfoot in an urban Mexican population. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive births in a private medical center that provides health care to an open population and identified all cases of clubfoot. Confidence intervals were calculated and reported. Results: The prevalence of clubfoot in the studied population was of 2.32 per 1,000 live births (CI_95%: 0.86 - 3.77). Conclusions: This study adds valuable information to the epidemiology of clubfoot. Based upon the known birthrate in Mexico, we estimated that each year there are 5,600 new cases of clubfoot. Level of evidence: II, prevalence study.

REFERENCES

1. Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA: Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467(5): 1146- 1153.

2. Vázquez VG. Deformidades del pie, tratamiento conservador. 1ª ed. México D.F. (México): Limusa; Capítulo 9. Anomalías congénitas de pie. Pie equino varo congénito; 1987: 227-234.

3. Mann AR, Coughlin MJ. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 6ª Edición. St. Louis, MO (EUA): Mosby. Capítulo 31, Congenital Foot Deformities; 1993: 1314-1327.

4. Hulme A. The management of congenital talipes equinovarus. Early Hum Dev 2005; 81(10): 797-802. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

5. Staheli LT. Ortopedia Pediátrica. Madrid (España): Marban. Capítulo 5, Pie, Pie Zambo; 2006: 102-109. Español.

6. Chapman C, Stott NS, Port RV, Nicol RO. Genetics of club foot in Maori and Pacific people. J Med Genet 2000; 37(9): 680-3.

7. Moorthi RN, Hashmi SS, Langois P, Canfield M, Waller DK, Hecht JT. Idiopathic talipes equinovarus (ITEV) (clubfeet) in Texas. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 132(4): 376-80.

8. Giannestras NJ. Foot disorders, Medical and Surgical Treatment. 2nd ed. London (GB): Lea & Febiger. Capítulo 10, The Clubfoot; 1973: 237-301.

9. Andriesse H, Roos EM, Hägglund G, Jarnlo GB. Validity and responsiveness of the clubfoot assessment protocol (CAP). A methodological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 28.

10. Wang LL, Fu WN, Li-Ling J, Li ZG, Li LY, Sun KL. HOXD13 may play a role in idiopathic congenital clubfoot by regulating the expression of FHL1. Cytogenet Genome Res 2008; 121(3-4): 189-95. Epub 2008 Ago 28.

11. Gurnett CA, Alaee F, Kruse LM, Desruisseau DM, Hecht JT, Wise CA, Bowcock AM, Dobbs MB. Asymmetric lower-limb malformations in individuals with homeobox PITX1 gene mutation. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 83(5): 616-22. Epub 2008 Oct 23.

12. Ester AR, Tyerman G, Wise CA, Blanton SH, Hecht JT. Apoptotic gene analysis in idiopathic talipes equinovarus (clubfoot). Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 462: 32-7.

13. Wallander H, Hovelius L, Michaelsson K. Incidence of congenital clubfoot in Sweden. Acta Orthop 2006; 77(6): 847-52.

14. Roye DP Jr, Roye BD. Idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002; 10(4): 239-48.

15. Kruse LM, Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA. Polygenic threshold model with sex dimorphism in clubfoot inheritance: the Carter effect. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90(12): 2688-94.

16. Canale ST. Cirugía Ortopédica. 10ª ed. Madrid (España): Elsevier. Capítulo 7, Malformaciones Congénitas; 2003: 988-1005.

17. Carey M, Bower C, Mylvaganam A, Rouse I. Talipes equinovarus in Western Australia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003; 17(2): 187-94.

18. Engesaeter LB. Increasing incidence of clubfoot: changes in the genes or the environment? Acta Orthop 2006; 77(6): 837-8.

19. James LM. Maps of birth defects occurrence in the U.S., birth defects monitoring program (BDMP)/CPHA, 1970- 1987. Teratology 1993; 48(6): 551-646.

20. Mittal RL, Sekhon AS, Singh G, Thakral H. The prevalence of congenital orthopaedic anomalies in a rural community. Int Orthop 1993; 17(1): 11-2.

21. Barker S, Chesney D, Miedzybrodzka Z, Maffulli N. Genetics and epidemiology of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop 2003; 23(2): 265-72.

22. Boo NY, Ong LC. Congenital talipes in Malaysian neonates: incidence, pattern and associated factors. Singapore Med J 1990; 31(6): 539-42.

23. Hefti F. Pediatric orthopedics in practice. 1ª ed. Nueva York (EUA): Springer; Capítulo 3, Diseases and injuries by site, 3.4 Foot and Ankle, 3.4.3 Congenital clubfoot; 2007: 374- 387.

24. Epedegui T. Actualización y controversias en el PEVAC. Madrid (España): Vicente Ediciones. Capítulo, Estudio epidemiológico del pie zambo en España; 1993: 36-42. Español.

25. CIA – World Fact Book [Internet]. Central Intelligence Agency; [actualizado 2009 Nov 27; citado 2009 Dic 15]. Disponible en: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/ the-world-factbook/geos/mx.html

26. CIA – World Fact Book [Internet]. Central Intelligence Agency; [actualizado 2009 Nov 27; citado 2009 Dic 15]. Disponible en: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/ the-world-factbook/geos/mx.html.

27. Diario Oficial. Catálogo de las lenguas indígenas nacionales: Variantes lingüísticas de México con sus autodenominaciones y referencias geoestadísticas (Continúa en la Segunda Sección) [Internet]. México: Diario Oficial; 2008 [citado 2009 Ago 15]. Disponible en:: http://www.cdi.gob.mx/

28. Navarrete LF. Los pueblos indígenas de México, Pueblos Indígenas del México Contemporáneo [Internet]. México; 2008 [citado 2009 Ago 15]. Disponible en:: http://www. cdi.gob.mx/

29. Salinero G. Mezclado y sospechosa movilidad e identidades, España y América (siglos XVI-XVIII). Vol. 90. Madrid (España): Casa de Velázquez. Capítulo II, Los grupos sociales: formación, control e identidad; 2005: 105.