2010, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Acta Med 2010; 8 (3)
Application of ropivacaine in vesicular bed in laparoscopic surgery
Ramírez CS, Rosales BM, San Germán TLMC
Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 134-139
PDF size: 171.45 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The application of incisional and intraabdominal local anesthetic reduced pain. This technique is recommended in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The core demonstrate than ropivacaine is better than ketorolac IV.
Material and methods: Sixty patients underwent cholecystectomy laparoscopy were included and randomized divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 30) ASA physical status I or II, received ropivacaine 7.5% (52.5 mg in to bed of the gallbladder at the end surgery and 60 mg before trocar placement). Group 2 (n = 30) ASA physical status I or II, received nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs (NSAD) only (ketorolac 60 mg IV). Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 0, 15, 30, 60 and 90 minutes. Morphine was applicated when the pain was most intense (0.5 mg/kg IV) in both groups.
Results: Ropivacaine administrated at the bed surgery shown better analgesia effect than administrated ketorolac IV.
Conclusions: Postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery is less that after laparotomy, and patient may benefit from an intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetic.
REFERENCES
Polley LS, Columb MO. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine: concentrating on dosing. Anesteh Analg 2003; 96: 1251-1253.
Forse A, El-Beheiry H, Butler PO, Pace RF. Indomethacin and ketorolac given preoperatively are equally effective in reducing early postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Surg 1996; 39: 26-30.
Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 167: 84-96.
Alexander JI. Pain after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 369-378.
Noma H, Kakiuchi H, Nojiri K, Izumi R, Tashiro C. Evaluation of postoperative pain relief by infiltration of ropivacaine or epidural block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Masui 2001; 50(11): 1201-4.
Lee IO, Kim SH, Kong MH, Lee MK, Kim NS, Choi YS et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the effect and timing of incisional and intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48(6): 545-50.
Elfberg BA, Sjovall-Mjoberg S. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine does not effectively reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10(6): 357-9.
Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kristiansen VB, Callesen T, Schulze S, Kehlet H et al. Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 1017-24.
Mřiniche S, Jřrgensen H, Wetterslev J, Dahl JB. Local anesthetic infiltration for postoperative relief after laparoscopy: A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of intraperitoneal, port-site infiltration and mesosalpinx block. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 899-912.
Szem JW, Hydo L, Barie PS. A double-blinded evaluation of intraperitoneal ropivacaine vs saline for the reduction of post-operative pain and nausea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 44-8.
Karadeniz U, Erdemli O, Unver S et al. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine infusion and injection for postoperative pain management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesteshic Dergeze 2003; 11: 226-30.
Alexander JI. Pain after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 369-78.
Saunders CJ, Laery BF, Wolfw BM. Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy wise? Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 1263-8.
Fiorillo MA, Davidson PG, Fiorillo M et al. 149 ambulatory laparoscopies cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 52-6.
Sarac AM, Aktan AO, Baykan N et al. The effect and timing of local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6: 362-6.
Michaloliakou C, Chung F, Sharma S. Preoperative multimodal analgesia facilitates recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 44-51.