medigraphic.com
Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México

2010, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2010; 84 (2)

Parámetros de calidad óptica en adultos mexicanos sanos

Hernández-Bautista WE, Guerrero-Berguer O, Arroyo-Muñoz LL

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 107-111
PDF size: 148.16 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Purpose: To observe the behavior of the total percentage of aberrations of high order and spherical aberration in healthy Mexican adults, as well as its correlation with the depth of focus and contrast sensitivity.
Material and methods: A prospective, , transversal, observational and descriptive study was carried out between May to July of the 2008, that include healthy Mexican patients between 20 and 6 years; 77 eyes was evaluated with depth of focus , contrast, sensitivity and wave front test.
Results: Comparisons between groups were made finding significant differences in the values of contrast sensitivity and depth of focus and non significant for the aberrations values. The correlation between the depth of focus and the sphere was only one the statistically significant.
Conclusions: It was a diminution of contrast sensitivity and depth of focus, as well as an increase of percent and positive values of the aberrations conform increased of the age. There was not relation between the values of spherical aberration and total percentage of aberrations of high order with contrast sensitivity and depth of focus for the Mexican adult population studied.


REFERENCES

  1. Kaufman P, Adler F, Alm A. Adler fisiología del ojo. 10a edición. España: Mosby, Elsevier; 2004.

  2. Martinez Palmer A y cols. Influencia de la aberración esférica en la función visual tras cirugía de catarata: ensayo prospectivo aleatorio. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005; 80(2):71-77.

  3. Thibos LN, Alpplegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R. Standars for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg 2002; 18(5):652-660.

  4. Oshika y cols. Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40(7):1351-1355.

  5. Parker M y cols. Wevefront technology in cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15:56-60.

  6. Miller D, Gurland JE, Isbey EK y cols. Optics, refraction and contact lenses. En: Basic and Clinical Science Course. Wilson FM. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology,1992:103.

  7. Rosas JA, Mantilla MC, Ruiz A. Snellen contra sensibilidad al contraste ¿Cuánto es en realidad 20/20 de la función visual? http://www.franjapublicacion?

  8. Ginsburg, A. Contrast Sensitivity: Determining The Visual Quality And Function Of Cataract, Intraocular Lenses And Refractive Surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006; 17:19-26.

  9. Cibis GW. Fundamentos y principios de oftalmología. Barcelona. Elservier, 2007.

  10. Wang, B , Ciuffreda KJ. Depth-Of-Focus Of The Human Eye: Theory And Clinical Implications. Surv Ophthalmol 2006;51:75-85.

  11. Medina Álvarez y cols. Sensibilidad Al Contraste En Población Mexicana Sana. Salud Pública Méx 1995; 37:310-315.

  12. Bellucci R, Morselli S. Optimizing Higher-Order Aberrations With Intraocular Lens Technology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007; 8:67-73.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com