<< Back Next >>
Arch Med Urg Mex 2010; 2 (1)
Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 17-24
PDF size: 164.64 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the survival of heart attack and angina thirty days in patients with acute myocardial infarction who were not thrombolized compared patients who received therapy with thrombolytics.
Material and methods: A cohort study to 30 days in patients with acute myocardial infarction in two general hospitals during the period of over two years. It included all patients who were admitted with the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction or that operate within the Emergency Department. We excluded patients who had been diagnosed and treated at another hospital and were removed to have died of causes not related to infarction, while in the hospital or during the 30 days of follow-up. Was considered acute myocardial infarction if they had two or more criterions when their arrived to hospital; chest pain or equivalent ischemic origin, presence of neurovegetative symptoms, electrocardiographic changes and enzyme elevation. We evaluated the presence of angina, death or new myocardial infarction during their hospital stay and for 30 days.
Statistical analysis: Percentages were used for descriptions of demographic variables and the χ
2 for the analysis of percentages (with Fisher exact test where appropriate). For the analysis of continuous variables used the Student t-test and assessed the relative risk (RR) for the risk of death, angina and myocardial infarction.
Results: We included 74 patients, of whom one was eliminated by loss to follow up. Of 73 patients 38 patients were thrombolized and 35 not, of whom 56 were men (76.7%) and 17 women (23.3%) with a mean age of 59.18 ± 13.6 years (minimum 26 and maximum 89 years). Average time of onset of pain and arrival to hospital was 599.92 minutes with an average blood pressure of 124/76. Most patients were admitted with a Killip-Kimball functional class I in 70 patients (95.9%), II, 2 (2.7%) III, IV and 0, 1 (1.4%), 64 patients showed no arrhythmia. Were not thrombolized 35 (Group I) and 38 (Group II) received therapy thrombolytic; 19 were used tenecplasa, 12 rtPA and 7 with streptokinase. The mortality rate was 8.2% (11.4% in group I and group II 5.2%) without significant difference between groups (p = 0.298), there were no significant differences for age (p = 0.094), blood pressure, CK MB to arrive to hospital (p = 0.72 for TAS, 0821 for the TAD, CK and 0.36 for 0148 MB fraction). Only blood glucose was significantly higher in the group not thrombolized (203.7
vs 170.7 mg/dL, p = 0.005). There was a mortality of 6 patients (8.2%), the infarcted area was the most common inferior, all had 3 or more major risk factors for ischemic heart disease, and two patients were deceased thrombolized used tenecplasa.
Conclusions: In this work, we found no significant differences in the presence of death, myocardial infarction or angina at 30 days in patients with acute myocardial infarction who were not thrombolized compared with patients who received therapy, thrombolytics.
REFERENCES
Registro Nacional de los Síndromes coronarios agudos (RENASICA). Sociedad Mexicana de Cardiología. Arch Cardiol Mex 2002; 72. Suppl. 2: S45-S64.
Registro Nacional de los Síndromes Coronarios Agudos (RENASICA). Sociedad Mexicana de Cardiología. Arch Cardiol Mex 2005; 75. Supl. 1: S6-S19.
Habib G. Current status of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. I optimal selection of delivery of a thrombolytic drug. Chest 1995; 107: 225-233.
Cissage J. Acute myocardial infarction, Reperfusion strategies. Chest 1994; 106: 1851-1865.
Alpert and Thygesen et al. Myocardial infarction redefined. JACC 200; 36: 959-969.
Boersman E, Mercado N, Poldermans D, Gardie M, Vos J, Simons M. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2003; 361: 847-858.
García M, Jerjes C, Ruiz A. Revalidando los criterios de reperfusión no invasivos en pacientes con IAM sometidos a trombólisis farmacológica. Arch Inst Cardiol Méx 1993; 62: 463-468.
Jerjes C, Garza A, Gutiérrez P. Trombólisis farmacológica en infarto agudo al miocardio: Lecciones aprendidas después del ISIS-2 y del GUSYO-1. Arch Inst Cardiol Méx 1999; 69: 478-487.
Gruppo Italiano Per Los Studio Della Sopravivenza Nell Infarcto Miocárdico-2 (GISSI-2). A factorial randomized trial of alteplasa versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12,490 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1990; 336: 65-71.
Global Utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occlusive coronary arteries (GUSTO) an international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673-692.
International study of infact size-3 (ISIS-3). A randomized comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anisteplase and aspirin plus heparin and heparin alone among 41,299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1992; 339: 753-790.
Grazia M, Santoro E, De Vita C et al. Ten year follow-up of the first megatrial testing thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 98: 2659-2665.
Task Force on myocardial reperfusion. Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994; 68: 2091-2101.
Bovil E, Becker R, Tracy R. Monitoring thrombolytic therapy. Progress in cardiovacular diseases 1992; XXXIV: 279-294.
Shelfther S, Manollo T, Gersh B, Unrecognized myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 801-811.
Schull M, Battista R, Brophy J, Joseph L, Cass D. Determining appropriateness of coronary thrombolysis in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 12-18.
Jiménez O, Fernández M, StoCkins B. Infarto Agudo al Miocardio. Uso de trombólisis en pacientes en protocolo AUGE del Hospital Hernán Henríquez Aravena de Temuco. REMS 2006; 2: 47-50.
Valladares F, Iraola M, Nieto P. Trombólisis tardía. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2000; 14: 99-106.
Esquivel C, Chávez L, Albarrán J et al. Índice pronóstico de infarto agudo al miocardio con elevación ST en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Med Int Mex 2008; 24: 22-27.
Pila R, Rodríguez A, Padrón G, Risco O, Pila R, Kwaku K. Infarto de miocardio agudo en ancianos. Estudio comparativo. Anales de Cirugía Cardiaca y Vascular 2000; 6: 126-132.
Carrion M, Becerra L, Pinto J, Postigo R. Características clínicas y seguimiento a 30 días de pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo. Rev Soc Peru Med Interna 2007; 20: 53-59.
Vallejo G, Ledesma J, Arriaga R. Infarto agudo al miocardio: Incidencia y mortalidad a 30 días posterior a trombólisis con estreptocinasa. Rev Mex Patol Clin 2001; 48: 78-82.
23, Nainggolan L. Women With STEMI Fare Worse Than Men CME Medscape Medical News, December 10, 2008.
Stevenson R, Ranjadayalan K, Wilkinson P, Roberts R, Timmis AD. Short and Long Term Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Since Introduction of Thrombolysis. British Medical Journal 1993; 307: 349-353.
Morrow D, Antman E, Charlesworth A et al. TIMI Risk Score for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Convenient, Bedside, Clinical Score for Risk Assessment at Presentation. Circulation 2000; 102: 2031-2037.
Zehender M, Kasper W, Kauder E, Schonthaler M, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 981-988.
Hreybe H, Singla IMD, Razak E, Saba S. Predictors of Cardiac Arrest Occurring in the Context of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007; 30: 1262-1266.
Thiemann D, Coresh J, Schulman S et al. ¿Los trombolíticos son beneficiosos o perjudiciales en los pacientes añosos? Circulation 2000; 101: 2239-2246.
Yano K, Grove J, Reed D, Chun H. Determinants of the Prognosis After a First Myocardial Infarction in a Migrant Japanese Population The Honolulu Heart Program. Circulation 1993; 88: 2582-2595.
Rich M. Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Elderly. American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2006; 15: 7-11.