medigraphic.com
Coordinación General de Investigación de la Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición y la Dirección General de Sistemas e Informática de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

2003, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Salud Publica Nutr 2003; 4 (1)

Prevalencia de vaginosis bacterianaen una clínica universitaria

Flores ER, Martínez VRT, Llaca DJM

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page:
PDF size: 59.86 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Without a doubt the infections of the genitals anywhere in the world represent a high index of consultation in most of the institutions that serve of health. These infections can be caused by diverse organizations, from aerobic bacteria and anaerobic, fungi, virus and parasites, some of these can or not be transmitted sexually. It determine the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in women in fertile age of 15 to 45 years in patients who go to the University Clinic. of New Town (PROUNISEV) in Apodaca, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. The samples were obtained from 118 feminine patients who went to the department of familiar planning of the University Clinic. They studied the average of age was of 28 years, with a rank from 16 to 44. The diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis settled down in the 33,8% (40/118) of the women in study.The 60% (24/40) of the women with bacterial vaginosis, declared an increase of the vaginal flow or its disagreeable scent. Of the 118 women, 14 (11.8%) have but of a sexual pair, of these 78% (11/14) presented bacterial vaginosis. The vaginal secretion in the women with bacterial vaginosis, 65% (26/40) they presented flow gray color, a 20% (8/40) of white color, in a 10% (4/40) greenish flow and of yellow color in 5% (2/40). The disagreeable scent of the secretion in women appeared in the 87,5% (35/40). The cells key they were observed in 31 (77.5%) of the patients. pH vaginal greater of 4,5 was detected in 37 (92.5%) of the women with vaginosis.


REFERENCES

  1. Holzman, C., JM. Leventhal, H Qiu, NM Jones, J Wang 2001. Factors Linked to Bacterial Vaginosis in Nonpregnant Women American Journal of Public Health Vol 91, No. 10: 1664-1670

  2. Mandell, G., G. Douglas, y J. Bennet 1991. Enfermedades Infecciosas. Principios y Práctica Ed. Panamericana. 3 edición pp 1006-1011

  3. Scapini, JC y CA Guzmán 1986. Detección de bacilos Gram negativos curvos anaerobios en pacientes con vaginosis Revista Obstetricia y Ginecología Latinoamericana Vol.44 No. 9:320-325.

  4. Holzman, C., et. al. Op.cit.

  5. Peipert JF, AB Montagno, AS Cooper and CJ Sung 1997. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for upper genital tract infection. American Journal Obstetric Gynecology Vol. 177 No. 5:1184-1187

  6. Canto de Cetina T, L. Polanco Reyes, V Fernández González y G Cupul 2002. Prevalencia de vaginosis bacteriana en un grupo de mujeres de una clínica de planificación familiar. Gaceta Médica México Vol. 138 No. 1: 25-30

  7. 7.Hillier SL , J Martius, M Krohn, N Kiviat, KK Holmes and DA Eschenbach. 1988. A case-control study of chorioamnionic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity The New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 319:No. 5, 972-978

  8. Gustaaf MV 2001. Parto espontáneo pretérmino: reducción, tratamiento y resultado. European Journal of Obsterics and gynecology an Reproductive Biology (Edición Española) 1, 181-183

  9. Rado AM, JF Mere y M García 2001. Riesgo de las complicaciones de vaginosis bacteriana en gestantes Ginecología y Obstetricia Vol. 47 No. 3:177-183

  10. Spiegel CA, R Amsel and Holmes KK. 1983. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid. Journal Clinical Microbiology Vol. 18 No.1:170-177

  11. Canto de Cetina, T., et. al., Op. Cit.

  12. Shoubnikova M, D Hellberg, S Nilsson and PA Mardh 1997.Contraceptive use in women with bacterial vaginosis. Contraception Vol. 55 No.6:355-8

  13. Canto de Cetina, T., et. al., Op. Cit




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com