medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2009, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2009; 13 (4)

Influence of the polymerizing cycle on the monomer concentration of three commercial resins for denture base

Venegas LRD, Solórzano LF, Moreno MV, López MS

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 205-216
PDF size: 371.20 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Materials used in the elaboration of complete dentures have instructions for their correct use; however they are not followed properly, producing alterations in the residual monomer concentration. Objective: The main objective was to demonstrate the importance of the relation between time and polymerization temperature (Polymerization Cycle) on the residual monomer concentration of the heat polymerized acrylic resins used in the elaboration of denture bases. Methods: For quantification and analysis of residual monomer 3 discs of every commercial acrylic resin were made, according to manufacturers´ instructions (9 discs). Those were analyzed by Gas Chromatography (GC) for the quantification of the residual monomer concentration. Also, 3 discs of every acrylic resin applying three different polymerization cycles were made: conventional method M1, short-term terminal boiled M2 and long-term terminal boiled M3 (27 discs), to be analyzed by Gas Chromatography for the quantification of the residual monomer concentration. Results: The analysis showed that the resin Acriethil® MMR was 0.3780%, while the resin Nictone® has the lowest percentage, reaching a value of 0.0482% of MMR and resin-45 High Impact Denture Acrylic® has the highest percentage of residual monomer produces a value of 0.5770%. While analyzing the results from the three different polymerization cycles applied, a significant change from the residual monomer concentration on both acrylic resins analyzed was observed. Conclusions: The three acrylic denture base resins analyzed in this research fulfill the residual monomer concentration established by ISO 1567:1999 with success to be handled under the manufacturer conditions. But if the polymerization cycle is changed, alterations of the residual monomer concentration will be obtained.


REFERENCES

  1. Takahashi Y, Chai J, Kawaguchi M. Effect of water sorption on the resistance to plastic deformation of a denture base material relined with four different denture reline materials. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 80: 49-54.

  2. Anusavice, Gutiérrez R, Sánchez y Castillo. La ciencia de los materiales dentales. México Interamericana Mc Graw-Hill 2004: 219-244.

  3. Jorge JH, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL, Vergani CE. Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90(2): 190-3.

  4. Pfeiffer P, Rosenbauer EU. Residual methyl methacrylate monomer, water sorption, and water solubility of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92(1): 72-8.

  5. Pfeiffer P, Rosenbauer EU. Flexural strength and moduli of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93(4): 372-7.

  6. Bayraktar G, Guvener B, Bural C, Uresin Y. Influence of polymerization method curing process, and length of time of storage in water on the residual methyl methacrylate content in dental acrylic resins. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Bimater 76B 2006: 340-345.

  7. Jagger RG. Effect of the curing cycle properties of a polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 1978; 5: 151-7.

  8. Lung CYK, Darvell BW. Minimization of the inevitable residual monomer in denture base acrylic. Dent Mater 2005; 21(12): 1119-28.

  9. Lung CYK, Darvell BW. Methyl methacrylate in poly (methyl metacrylate) Validation of direct injection gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2004; 1061: 93-98.

  10. Sadamori et al. A meted of determining residual monomer in acrylic resin using methyl ethyl ketone. Aust Dent J 1990; 35(6): 509-13.

  11. Urbana V et al. Residual monomer of reline acrylic resins. Effect of water-bath and microwave post-polymerization treatments. Dent Mater 2007; 23(3): 363-8.

  12. Shim JS, Watts DC. Residual monomer concentrations in denture-base acrylic resin after an additional, soft-liner, heat-cure cycle. Dent Mater 1999; 15(4): 296-300.

  13. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE, Buykuilmaz S. Effect of polymerization temperature and time on the residual monomer content of denture base polymers. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106(1): 588-93.

  14. Vallittu PK, Miettinen V, Alakuijala P. Residual monomer content and its release into water from denture base materials. Dent Mater 1995; 11(6): 338-42.

  15. Dogan A, Bek B, Cevik NN, Usanmaz A. The effect of preparation conditions of acrylic denture base materials on the level of residual monomer, mechanical properties and water absorption. J Dent 1995; 23(5): 313-8.

  16. Sadamori S et al. Influence of thickness and location on the residual monomer content of denture base cured by three processing methods. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72(1): 19-22.

  17. Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Denture base polymer Alldent Sinomer: mechanical properties, water sorption and release of residual compounds. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28(7): 607-13.

  18. Willard HH. Instrumental methods of analysis. Wadsworth, Inc., USA, 1988.

  19. Handbooks of Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Ion Exchange Chromatography, Affinity Chromatography, Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography, Reversed Phase Chromatography, Sweden. 2002.

  20. Manual de uso del acrílico Nic tone®, MCD Dental, Zapopan, Jalisco México.

  21. Manual de uso del acrílico Acriethil®. Arias Comercializadora y Distribuidora Dental S.A. de C.V.

  22. Manual de uso del acrílico High Impact-45 Denture Acrylic®. Lang Dental Mfg. Co. Inc. Wheeling, IL 60090-0969, USA.

  23. International Standard. ISO 1567 Dentistry-denture base polymers. Third Edition. 1999-02-15.

  24. Wayne WD. Bioestadística, base para el análisis de las ciencias de la salud. Editorial Limusa México 1983.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com