medigraphic.com

2009, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Vet Mex 2009; 40 (1)

Reduced environments for production of culture susceptible aquatic organisms for human consumption

Sánchez MPE, Romero JJ, Negrete RP, López SR, Malpica SA

Language: English/Spanish
References: 44
Page: 55-67
PDF size: 730.12 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Anoxic sediments favor sulfate reducing bacteria proliferation, main characteristic of reduced environments, which are used for crustaceous culture. In Mexico, it has been reported the presence of anoxic sediments in the channels of Xochimilco, reduced environment that could be used for culture of organisms, like crayfish (Cambarellus montezumae). The aim of this study was to prove that reduced environments can be used for the production of culture susceptible aquatic organisms for human consumption. Apatlaco and Cuemanco channels are characterized as reduced environments, its water and sediment physicochemical parameters were evaluated; heavy metals in sediment and organisms were assessed; presence and sanitary quality of crayfish was proven, through qualitative and quantitative analysis of its bacteria charge; nutritional quality of crayfish was determined, by proximal chemical analysis. It was proven that the channels of Xochimilco fulfill the reduced environment characteristics, presence of crayfish C. montezumae in these channels was verified, it was shown that the levels of heavy metals and bacteria charge recorded, do not exceed the maximum allowed limits for edible crustaceous, important protein source for human consumption. Based on the previous, it is affirmed that reduced environments can be used for culture of edible aquatic species.


REFERENCES

  1. WEBB MC GINNESS, LAPPIN SCOTT, WEBB JEREMY S. Metal removal by sulphate-reducing bacteria from natural and constructed wetlands. J Appl Microbiol 1998; 84:240-248.

  2. HAACK-SHERIDAN, FOGARTY L R, WEST TG, ALM EW, MCGUIRE JT, LONG DT et al. Spatial and temporal changes in microbial community structure associated with recharge influenced chemical gradients in a contaminated aquifer. Env Microbiol 2004;6:438-448.

  3. ULRICH GA, KRUMHOLZ LE. A rapid and simple method for estimating sulfate reduction activity and quantifying inorganic. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63 (4): 16-27.

  4. JORGENSEN BB. The microbial sulphur cycle. Microbial geochemistry. Oxford: Blackwell Scientifi c Publications, 1983.

  5. BARG UC. Orientación para la promoción de la ordenación medio ambiental del desarrollo de la acuacultura costera. Roma, Italia: FAO Documentos técnicos de pesca Fisheries Technical 1992;138.

  6. ERLER D, POLLARD P, DUNCAN P, KNIIBB W. Treatment of shrimp farm effluent with omnivorous finfish and artificial substrates. Aquaculture Res 2004;35:816-827.

  7. BACHERE E. Shrimp inmunity and disease control. Aquaculture 2000;191:3-11.

  8. LE MOULLAC G. HAFFNER P. Environmental factors affecting inmune responses in crustacea. Aquaculture 2000;191:121-131.

  9. MUSTAFA MH. The present situation of freshwater crayfish, Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) in Turkey. Aquaculture 2003;230:181-187.

  10. OTA H, KINJO S. Nature farming and shrimp production in South America. Seventh International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. Proceedings of the conference held at Christchurch; 2002 January15-18; New Zealand Bangkok. New Zealand Bangkok: Asia Pacific Natural Agriculture Network (APNAN), 2003: 226-228.

  11. JACKSON JC, PRESTON N, BURFORD MA, THOMPSON PJ. Manning the development of sustainable shrimp farming in Australia: the role of sedimentation ponds in treatment of farm discharge water. Aquaculture 2003;226:23-34.

  12. JUAREZ-FIGUEROA LA, SILVA-SANCHEZ J, URIBESALAS FJ, CIFUENTES-GARCIA E. Microbiological indicators of water quality in the Xochimilco chaneles, Mexico City. Mexico City: Salud Pública de México 2003; 45 (5):389-395.

  13. UNESCO. Proyecto para la identificación participativa de un plan de rehabilitación integral del patrimonio cultural de Xochimilco. México DF: UNESCO, 2005.

  14. DIARIO OFICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN, 1996. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-127-SSA1994. Salud ambiental, para uso y consumo humano – límites permisibles de calidad y tratamientos a que debe someterse el agua para su potabilización. 18 enero 1996.

  15. DIARIO OFICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN, 1995. Proyecto de Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-022-PESCA- 1994. Que establece las regulaciones de higiene y su control, así como la aplicación del sistema de análisis de riesgos y control de puntos críticos en las instalaciones y procesos de las granjas acuícolas. 26 enero 1995.

  16. APHA. Standard Methods for examination of water and waterwasted. 14th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association, 1992.

  17. RODIER J. Análisis de las aguas. 2da ed. Barcelona: Omega, 1990.

  18. MACHESKY ML, SLOWIKOWSKI JA, CAHILL RA, BOGNER CW, MARLIN JC, HOLM TR et al. Sediment quality and quantity issues related to the restoration of backwater lakes along the Illinois River waterway. Aquat Ecosystem health Management Soc 2005;8:33-40.

  19. RODRÍGUEZ-SERNA M, CARMONA-OSALDE C. Balance energético del acocil Cambarellus montezumae (Saussure) (Crustacea Astacidae Cambride) pérdida de energía en la tasa metabólica. Universidad y Ciencia 2002; 18 (36):128-134.

  20. DIARIO OFICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-029-SSA1-1993. Bienes y Servicios. Productos de la pesca. Crustáceos en conserva. Especificaciones sanitarias. 27 febrero 1995

  21. POSTEGATE JR. The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria. Cambrige: University Press, 1969.

  22. DÍAZ R, GAMANZO C, LÓPEZ GI. Manual práctico de microbiología. Madrid: España: MASSON, 1998.

  23. MANUAL DE MEDIOS DE CULTIVO MERCK. Darmstadt Alemania: Merk KGaA, 1999.

  24. ANALYTICAL PROFILE INDEX. Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram negative Bacteria. 4th ed. France: BioMerioux, 1997.

  25. ANALYTICAL PROFILE INDEX. Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram negative Bacteria. 9th ed. Paris, France: BioMerioux, 1989.

  26. A.O.A.C. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 1990.

  27. SMITH MG. Manual of phycology an introduction to the algae and their biology. New York:The Ronald Press company, 1992.

  28. LANDAW M. INTRODUCTION TO AQUACULTURE. NEW YORK: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.

  29. RAMOS-BELLO R, CAJUSTE JL, FLORES-ROMÁN D, GARCÍA-CALDERÓN NE. Metales pesados, sales y sodio en suelos de chinampa en México. Agrociencia 2001;35:385-395.

  30. MADIGAN TM, MARTINKO MJ, PARKER J. Biología de los microorganismos, 8va ed. Madrid: Prentice Hall, 2000.

  31. HÄUBI SC. Teoría Ácido Básico de Stewart: Aplicaciones prácticas de una nueva teoría de la regulación del pH en los sistemas biológicos. México DF: Cigoma, 2004.

  32. DIARIO OFICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-004-SEMARNAT-2002. Protección Ambiental. Lodos y biosólidos. Eespecificaciones y límites máximos permisibles de contaminantes para su aprovechamiento y disposición final. 15 agosto 2003.

  33. APUN K, YUSOF AM, JUGANG K. Distribution of bacteria in tropical freshwater fish and ponds. Int J Environ Health Res 1999; 9: 285-292.

  34. VÁZQUEZ L, SIERRA C, JUÁREZ S, AGUNDIS C, ZAVALA A, ZENTENO E. Mecanismo de inmunidad en crustáceos. Interciencia 1998; 23:344-348.

  35. DIAS BAINY. Biochemical response in penaeids caused by contaminats. Aquaculture 2000;191:163-168.

  36. RODRIGUEZ J, LE MOULLAC G. State of the art of inmunological tolos and health control of penaeid shrimp. Aquaculture 2000 (191): 109-119.

  37. BROWN L. Acuicultura para veterinarios: Producción y clínica de peces. Zaragoza España: Acribia SA, 2000.

  38. PETERSEN A. DALSGAARD A. Antimicrobial resistance of intestinal aeromonas spp. And enterococus spp. In fish cultured in integrated broiler-fish farms in Thailandia. Aquaculture 2003;219:71-82.

  39. ANGULO F. Agentes microbianos en acuicultura: impacto potencial en la salud pública. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2000; 20 :217-219.

  40. MONROY M, DÍAZ-BF, RAZO I, CARRIZALES L. Evaluación de la contaminación por Arsénico y metales pesados (Pb, Cu, Zn) y análisis de riesgo en salud en Villa de la Paz-Matehuala, S.L.P. México DF: Instituto de metalurgia Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, 2002.

  41. AHEARN GA, MANDAL PK, MANDAL A. Mechanism of heavy-metal sequestration and detoxification in crustaceans: a review. J Comp Physiol Biol 2004; 174: 439-452.

  42. MARDSEN ID, RAINBOW PS. Does the accumulation of trace metal in crustaceans affect their ecology-the amphipod example? J Exp Mar Bio Eco 2004; 300: 373-408.

  43. GHERARDI F, BARBARESI S, VASELLI O, BENCINA A. A comparison of trace metal accumulation in indigenous and alien freshwater macro-decapods. Mar Fresh Behav. Physiol. 2001; 35: 179-188.

  44. GIL-SANCHEZ, ALBA-TORCEDOR. Ecology of the native and introduced crayfishes Astropotamobius pallipes and Procambarus clarkii in southern Spain implications for conservation of the native species. Biol Conserv 2002, 105: 75-78.ç




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com