medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2008, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2008; 22 (6)

Survival of the T28 Femoral stem. Comparison of polished versus roughed-surface finish

Chaidez RP, Younger A, Renán LS, Poss R

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 350-355
PDF size: 221.29 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Femoral stem loosening in total hip arthroplasty has a multifactorial etiology. T28 femoral stems have been made both roughed and polished-finish types, and differences in design are of interest in their effect on survival. Materials and methods: One hundred and sixty-seven stems (84 polished and 83 roughed-finish) placed between 1975 and 1982 were evaluated. Gruen zones were used to determine loosening and survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Revision was made in 24.8% of the cases. Twenty-year survival rates were of 85.2% for roughed-finish stems and of 64.2% for polished-finish stems. Conclusions: We were able to confirm our hypothesis concerning the longer survival rate of the roughed-finish implant which was of 87.95% at 17 years of follow-up. The survival-time of the implant was independent of diagnosis, cementation, age and positioning. The survival-time of the T28 cemented implant does not only depend on its texture but it has a multifactorial origin.


REFERENCES

  1. Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH: Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patient with hip arthroplasty. A 12 year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74B: 385-9.

  2. Wroblewski BM: 15-21 years results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1986; 211: 30-5.

  3. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM: The natural history of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on the long term survival of the Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80A: 715-21.

  4. Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Olejniczak JP, et al: Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A twenty to twenty five year follow up note. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80A: 704-14.

  5. Clohisy JC, Harris WH: Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average 10 year follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81A: 247-55.

  6. D’Lima DD, Oishi CS, Petersilge WJ, et al: 100 cemented versus noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs. Clin Orthop 1998; 348: 140-8.

  7. Herberts P, Malchau H: How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 1997; 344: 44-60.

  8. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon C, et al: Histomorphological studies of the long term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72A: 1220-9.

  9. Muller RT, Heger I, Oldenburg M: the mechanism of loosening in cemented hip prostheses determined from long term results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 41-5.

  10. Schmalzried TP, Maloney WJ, Jasty M, et al: Autopsy studies of the cement bone interfase in well fixed cemented total hip arthroplasties. J arthroplasty 1993; 8: 179-88.

  11. Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, et al: The outcome of Charnley Total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty year follow up. The result of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75A: 961-75.

  12. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD: Charnley Low-Friction arthroplasty of the hip. Long term results. Clin Orthop 1993; 292: 191-201.

  13. Carlsson AS, Getz CF: Mechanical loosening of the femoral head prosthesis the Charnley total hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1980; 147: 262.

  14. Cornell CN, Ranawat CS: Survivorship analysis of total hip replacement. Results in a series of active patient who were less than fifty five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 1430-4.

  15. Oh I, Carlson CE, Tomford WW, Harris WH: Improved fixation of the femoral component after total hip replacement using methacrylate intramedullary plug. J Bone Joint Surg 1978; 60A: 608.

  16. Berger RA, Kull LR, Rosenberg AG, et al: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996; 333: 134-6.

  17. Callaghan JJ, Tooma GS, Olejniczak JP, et al: Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: An interim follow up. Clin Orthop 1996; 333: 118-25.

  18. Gardnier RC, Hozack WJ: Failure of the bone cement interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement prostheses bond? J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76B: 49-52.

  19. Harris WH: Options for primary fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Cemented Stems for all. Clin Orthop 1997; 344: 118-23.

  20. Howie DW, Middleton RG, Costi K: Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80B: 573-6.

  21. Manley MT, Stern LS, Gurtowski J: The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 563-75.

  22. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, et al: Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement prostheses interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77A: 1315-22.

  23. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, et al: The effect of the surface roughness and PMMA precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prostheses. A study of patient less than fifty years old. J Bone Join Surg 1999; 81A: 481-92.

  24. Harris WH: Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements? Clin Orthop 1992; 285: 67.

  25. Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJC, Ling RSM: Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 1988; 19(3): 477.

  26. Shen G: Femoral stem fixation. An engineering interpretation of the long term of outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80B: 754-60.

  27. Chang PB, Mann KA, Bartel DL: Cemented femoral stems performance effects of proximal bonding, geometry and neck lenght. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 57-69.

  28. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE: A ten years follow up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone and Joint Surg 1982; 64A: 970-82.

  29. Collis DK, Mahler: Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 113-22.

  30. Charnley J: Low friction arthroplasty of the hip theory and practice. Berlin, Springer Verlag 1979: 78-85.

  31. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: «Modes of failure» of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17.

  32. Harris WH: Long term results of cemented femoral stems with roughened precoated surfaces. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 137-43.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com