medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Digital)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2008, Número 6

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2008; 22 (6)


Comparación de la supervivencia del vástago femoral (T28) con terminado liso o rugoso

Chaidez RP, Younger A, Renán LS, Poss R

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 32
Paginas: 350-355
Archivo PDF: 221.29 Kb.


RESUMEN

Introducción: El aflojamiento de los vástagos cementados en la artroplastía total de cadera es multifactorial, a través de su desarrollo el vástago T28 presentó dos tipos de acabado, sin embargo no se conocía el efecto de este acabado sobre la sobrevida del vástago. Material y métodos: Se evaluó 167 vástagos (84 lisos, 83 rugosos) colocados entre 1975 y 1982 para determinar el aflojamiento a través de las zonas de Gruen, de igual forma se valoró la superviviencia con el método de Kaplan-Meier. La revisión fue necesaria en 24.8% de los casos. Las curvas de supervivencia a 20 años fueron de 85.2% para el vástago rugoso y 64.2% para el vástago liso. Conclusiones: Se comprueba nuestra hipótesis sobre el éxito del 87.95% de la longevidad del implante rugoso a 17 años de seguimiento. La longevidad del implante es independiente del tipo de diagnóstico, cementación, edad y posición del vástago. La longevidad del vástago cementado T28 no sólo depende del terminado de su superficie sino que es multifactorial.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH: Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patient with hip arthroplasty. A 12 year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74B: 385-9.

  2. Wroblewski BM: 15-21 years results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1986; 211: 30-5.

  3. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM: The natural history of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on the long term survival of the Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80A: 715-21.

  4. Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Olejniczak JP, et al: Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A twenty to twenty five year follow up note. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80A: 704-14.

  5. Clohisy JC, Harris WH: Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average 10 year follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81A: 247-55.

  6. D’Lima DD, Oishi CS, Petersilge WJ, et al: 100 cemented versus noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs. Clin Orthop 1998; 348: 140-8.

  7. Herberts P, Malchau H: How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 1997; 344: 44-60.

  8. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon C, et al: Histomorphological studies of the long term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72A: 1220-9.

  9. Muller RT, Heger I, Oldenburg M: the mechanism of loosening in cemented hip prostheses determined from long term results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 41-5.

  10. Schmalzried TP, Maloney WJ, Jasty M, et al: Autopsy studies of the cement bone interfase in well fixed cemented total hip arthroplasties. J arthroplasty 1993; 8: 179-88.

  11. Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, et al: The outcome of Charnley Total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty year follow up. The result of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75A: 961-75.

  12. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD: Charnley Low-Friction arthroplasty of the hip. Long term results. Clin Orthop 1993; 292: 191-201.

  13. Carlsson AS, Getz CF: Mechanical loosening of the femoral head prosthesis the Charnley total hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1980; 147: 262.

  14. Cornell CN, Ranawat CS: Survivorship analysis of total hip replacement. Results in a series of active patient who were less than fifty five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 1430-4.

  15. Oh I, Carlson CE, Tomford WW, Harris WH: Improved fixation of the femoral component after total hip replacement using methacrylate intramedullary plug. J Bone Joint Surg 1978; 60A: 608.

  16. Berger RA, Kull LR, Rosenberg AG, et al: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996; 333: 134-6.

  17. Callaghan JJ, Tooma GS, Olejniczak JP, et al: Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: An interim follow up. Clin Orthop 1996; 333: 118-25.

  18. Gardnier RC, Hozack WJ: Failure of the bone cement interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement prostheses bond? J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76B: 49-52.

  19. Harris WH: Options for primary fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Cemented Stems for all. Clin Orthop 1997; 344: 118-23.

  20. Howie DW, Middleton RG, Costi K: Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80B: 573-6.

  21. Manley MT, Stern LS, Gurtowski J: The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 563-75.

  22. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, et al: Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement prostheses interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77A: 1315-22.

  23. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, et al: The effect of the surface roughness and PMMA precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prostheses. A study of patient less than fifty years old. J Bone Join Surg 1999; 81A: 481-92.

  24. Harris WH: Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements? Clin Orthop 1992; 285: 67.

  25. Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJC, Ling RSM: Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 1988; 19(3): 477.

  26. Shen G: Femoral stem fixation. An engineering interpretation of the long term of outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80B: 754-60.

  27. Chang PB, Mann KA, Bartel DL: Cemented femoral stems performance effects of proximal bonding, geometry and neck lenght. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 57-69.

  28. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE: A ten years follow up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone and Joint Surg 1982; 64A: 970-82.

  29. Collis DK, Mahler: Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 113-22.

  30. Charnley J: Low friction arthroplasty of the hip theory and practice. Berlin, Springer Verlag 1979: 78-85.

  31. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: «Modes of failure» of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17.

  32. Harris WH: Long term results of cemented femoral stems with roughened precoated surfaces. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 137-43.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com