medigraphic.com

2005, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Fac Med UNAM 2005; 48 (3)

Post-graduate examination through Internet

Borrego MPP, Ruiz PLC, Vélez DLC, Barradas CJH

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 97-100
PDF size: 36.44 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Computers, Internet or web pages have acquired a paramount importance in medical practice and medical education. Recently its use has been extended to evaluation of performance of pre and postgrade students. At the Medical School of UNAM the system has been applied for examinations to 2nd and 3th year residents of several specialties and various hospitals. A procedure and its norms has even been developed in the last three years.


REFERENCES

  1. McKimm J, Jollie C, Cantillon P. Web based learning. British Medical Journal 2003; 326: 870-873.

  2. Romiszowski A. Individualizing of theaching and learning where have we been; where are we going? Journal of Special Educational Technology 1994; 12: 182-194.

  3. Wittaker EM. How we teach physiology. Medical Teacher 1994; 16: 197-201.

  4. Brimberry WM, Riffee WH. Computers in the classroom: a form of active learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 1995; 59: 1-7.

  5. Gibbs WJ. An approach to designing computer based evaluation of students constructed responses: effect of achievement and instructional time. Jornal of Computing in Higher Education 1995; 6: 99-119.

  6. Butcher PG, Greenberg JM. Educational computing in the open university: the seconde. Educational and Computing 1992; 8: 201-215.

  7. Cardinale LA, Smith CM. The effects of computer assisted learnig strategy training on achievement of learning objectives. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1994; 10: 153-160.

  8. Lee G, Weerakooon P. The role of computer-aided assessment in health professional education: a comparison of student performance in computer-based and paper-and-pen multiple-choice test. Medical Teaching 2001; 23: 152-157.

  9. Dillon GF, Clyman SG. The computerization of clinical science examination and Its effects on the performance of third year medical students. Academic Medicine 1992; 67: S66-S-68.

  10. Burke MJ, Normand AL. Computerized psychological testing; overview and critique. Professional Psychology Research and Practice 1987; 18: 42-51.

  11. Mazzeo J. Harvey A. The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and Psychological test: A review of the literature. College Board Report 1988, 88-8 (New York, College Entrance Examination Board).

  12. Hicken S. Administering comprehensive examinations using computers. Collegiate Microcomputers 1993; 11: 194-198.

  13. Vansickle TR, Kapes JT. Comparing paper-pencil and computer-based versions of the Strong-Campell interest inventory. Computers in Human Behaviour 1993; 9: 441-449.

  14. Finegan JE, Allen NJ. Computerized and written questionnaires: are they equivalent? Computers in Human Behavior 1994; 10: 483-496.

  15. Dimock PH, Cormier P. The effects of format differences and computer differences on performance. Evaluation in Conselling and Development 1991: 24: 119-126.

  16. Mazzeo J. Comparability of computer and paper and pencil scores for two CLEP general examinations. College Board Reports 1991, 91-95 (New York Board Publications).

  17. Dillon GF, Clyman SG. The computerization of clinical science examination and its effects on the performance of third year medical students. Academic Medicine 1992; 67: S66-S-68.

  18. Ponce de León ME, Ortiz MA, Ruiz AMC. Estudio comparativo de la aplicación de un examen diagnóstico en posgrado, utilizando dos formatos: por computadora e impreso. En prensa.

  19. Butzini DW, Friedman CP, Brownlee RC. A pilot study of microcomputer testing in pediatrics. Medical Education 1984; 18: 339-342.

  20. Ogilvie RW, Trusk TC, Blue AV. Student’s attitudes toward computer testing in a basic science course. Medical Education 1999; 33: 828-831.

  21. Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, Webster GD. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence. Medical Education 1985; 19: 238-247.

  22. Borrego PP, Ruiz LC, Vélez LC. Los exámenes departamentales como instrumento de evaluación del Plan Único de Especializaciones Médicas (PUEM) de la Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. Rev Fac Med UNAM 2004; 47: 13-15.

  23. Khan KS, Davies DA, Gupta JK. Formative self-assessment using true-false questions on the Internet: feedback according to confidence about correct knowledge. Medical Teacher 2001; 23: 158-163.

  24. Barradas CH. Exámenes departamentales en línea. Programa interno DEEM, DEPI, UNAM 2002.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com