2008, Number 6
<< Back Next >>
Rev Fac Med UNAM 2008; 51 (6)
The use of multimedia technology in teaching history of medicine
Ramos de BMB, Viesca C Rodríguez NEV, Arvizu HM, Cruz GIC, Rodríguez TS, Montealegre AA, Sánchez RG
Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 252-256
PDF size: 96.71 Kb.
ABSTRACT
No abstract
REFERENCES
Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18(5): 407-8.
Stocking JE, Mo BP. Current status of interactive multimedia education in medicine. MD Comput 1995; 12(5): 373-81, 413.
Álvarez MCA, Llorente PJL, Martínez NA, Lana FA, Granda GE, Sampedro NA, Suárez NC. Multimedia educational material. A tool of support to the Otolaryngology. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2005; 56(1): 31-7.
Carl-Fredrik W, Edelbring S, Fors U, Hindbeck H, Ståhle M. Evaluation of an interactive case simulation system in dermatology and venereology for medical students. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6: 40.
Epstein CD. A capstone teaching project for undergraduate nursing students: development of a visual teaching-learning tool. J Nurs Educ 2007; 46(5): 235-7.
Posey L, Pintz C. Online teaching strategies to improve collaboration among nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2006; 26(8): 680-7.
Mahoney JS, Marfurt S, daCunha M, Engebretson J. Design and evaluation of an online teaching strategy in an undergraduate psychiatric nursing course. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2005; 19(6): 264-72.
Jang KS, Hwang SY, Park SJ, Kim YM, Kim MJ. Effects of a Web-based teaching method on undergraduate nursing students’ learning of electrocardiography. J Nurs Educ 2005; 44(1): 35-9.
Hsu LL, Hsieh SI. An exploration of scenario discussion in a Web-based nursing course. J Nurs Res 2006; 14(2): 155-65.
Cook DA, Dupras DM. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19(6): 698-707.
Gordon J. Medical humanities: to cure sometimes, to relieve often, to comfort always. MJA 2005; 182(1): 5-8.
Novak JD. The promise of new ideas and new technology for improving teaching and learning. Cell Biol Educ 2003; 2(2): 122-32.
Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6:41.
Riley JB, Austin JW, Holt DW, Searles BE, Darling EM. Internet-based virtual classroom and educational management software enhance students’ didactic and clinical experiences in perfusion education programs. J Extra Corpor Technol 2004; 36(3): 235-9.
Hong CH, McLean D, Shapiro J, Lui H. Using the internet to assess and teach medical students in dermatology. J Cutan Med Surg 2002; 6(4): 315-9.
Farrimond H, Dornan TL, Cockcrof A, Rhodes LE. Development and evaluation of an e-learning package for teaching skin examination. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155(3): 592-9.
Lifshitz A. Trends in medical education. Gac Med Mex 1997; 133(1): 25-33.
Wiley-L Mohammed KK, Paas F, Johnson TE, Payer AF. Interactive and dynamic visualizations in teaching and learning of anatomy: A cognitive load perspective. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist What is RSS? Anat Rec B New Anat 2005; 286(1): 8-14.
Woo MA, Kimmick JV. Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. J Prof Nurs 2000; 16(3): 132-9.
Oermann MH. Research on teaching methods. NLN Publ. 1990; (15-2339): 1-31.
Letterie GS. Medical education as a science: the quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188(3): 49-53.
Van Sint Jan S, Crudele M, Gashegu J, Feipel V, Poulet P, Salvia P, Hilal I, Sholukha V, Louryan S, Rooze M. Development of multimedia learning modules for teaching human anatomy: application to osteology and functional anatomy. Anat Rec B New Anat 2003; 272(1): 98-106.