Delgado BA, Ortiz AMR, Fernández CLA, Arroyo CLM

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 471-476
PDF size: 134.86 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Injuries associated to tract of birth and breathing disease constitutes a risk for life and function in the perinatal period, with an incidence referred in national literature that varies from 2-7% for the first one to 12.4% in the international literature for second.
Objective: To determine the incidence of injury associated to the tract of birth and breathing disease in newborns of term and compare the morbidity from birth among both tracts.
Material and method: Comparative, prospective, analytic cohort study. 350 newborns in term through vaginal tract were included, and 350 by abdominal tract. Injury associated to the tract of birth and breathing disease were analyzed. Statistical analysis: for comparison among groups χ² and t of Student, relative risk was determined.
Results: Injury associated to the tract of birth incidence was 5.1%, breathing pathology 13.7%. The ones born by vaginal tract had an increment in the frequency of injuries compared to those born by abdominal tract (p = 0.006). There was no statistic difference in the breathing disease among both channels of birth. Nevertheless the comparison between programmed caesarean vs. caesarean preceded by labour obtained a p = 0.004.
Conclusions: Injuries associated to birth in newborns by vaginal tract are conditioned mainly by forceps. There was no statistical significance of breathing disease when comparing both channels of birth. The caesarean preceded by labour provoked less respiratory morbility than programmed caesarean.

REFERENCES

1. Chávez RG, Lozano CV, Gómez GM, Peralta RM, et al. Correlación de los antecedentes obstétricos con la mortalidad neonatal. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 1986; 43(6):359-63.

2. García HJ, Peña A. Incidencia de lesiones asociadas al nacimiento en recién nacidos. Rev Med IMSS 2004;42(1):25-30.

3. Delgado BA, Fernández CL, Arroyo CL. Características del traumatismo al nacimiento en una institución de tercer nivel de atención. Perinatol Reprod Hum 2003;17:169-75.

4. Lara DV, López CJ, Silva MC. Traumatismo obstétrico: incidencia, clasificación y factores asociados. Perinatol Reprod Hum 1992;6(1):10-13.

5. Thompson PJ. Trabajo de parto y partos complicados. Parte I. Clin Perinatol 1995;4:889-905.

6. Gei FA, Belfort AM. Controversies in labor management. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics 1999;26(2):345-70.

7. Barrientos G, Cervera P, Navascues J, Sánchez R, et al. Obstetric trauma. A current problem? Cir Pediatr 2000;13(4):150-2.

8. [No authors listed]. Cesarean section on the rise. Lancet 2000;356:1697-8.

9. Smith JF, Hernández C, Wax JR. Fetal laceration injury at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90(3):344-46.

10. Hess P, Pratt S, Soni A, Sarna M, Oriol N. An association between severe labor pain and cesarean delivery. Obstet Anesthesia 2000;90:881-6.

11. MacCorckie J. En defensa del parto vaginal después de cesárea: crítica de la investigación actual. Disponible en:

12. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective cesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1995;102: 101-6

13. Usher R, McLean F, Maughan GB. Respiratory distress syndrome in infants delivered by caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964;88:806-15.

14. Curet LB, Zachman AV, Rao AV, Poole WK, et al. Effect of mode of delivery on incidence of respiratory distress syndrome. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1988;27:165-70.

15. Luerti M, Parazzini F, Agarossi A, Bianchi C, et al. Risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome in the newborn. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:359-64.

16. Hales KA, Morgan MA, Thurnau GR. Influence of labor androute of delivery on the frequency of respiratory morbidity in term neonates. International J of Gynaec and Obstet 1993; 43(1):35-40.

17. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom M. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Osbtet and Gyanecol 2001;97(3):439-42.

18. Hook B. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997;100(3):348-53.

19. Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Solda G, et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 2004;93(5):643-7.

20. Guzmán SA, Pandero BJL, Pandero BG, Briseño AC. Trauma obstétrico del neonato en el Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Ginecol Obstet Méx 1988;56:82-5.

21. Ponce De León TMM, Hernández SMD, Ibarra VRA, Rosas SS, Valdivia BA. Frecuencia y tipo de lesiones obstétricas en neonatos nacidos en un Hospital General. Rev Mex Pediatr 2000;67:161-65.

22. Martínez JL, Pardo J. Macrosomía fetal: ¿Riesgo perinatal? Rev Med Clin Las Condes 2003; 14:2. Disponible en

23. Guzmán IA, Ablanedo AJ, Basavilvazo RA, Martínez RO, Ahumada RE. ¿Se justifica la alta frecuencia de la cesárea en un Hospital Gineco-Obstétrico de alta especialidad? Ginecol Obstet Méx 2003;71:291-96.

24. Cabezas GE, Delgado LA, Morales O, Pérez PG. Comportamiento de la cesárea en la Secretaría de Salud durante el periodo 1990-95. Ginec Obst Mex 1998;66:335-8.

25. Coto GD, López J, Fernández B, García N, Campuzano S. Recién nacido a término con dificultad respiratoria: enfoque diagnóstico y terapéutico. Protocolos de Asoc Esp Pediatr 257-274. Disponible en .