García-Peña C, Thorogood M, Wonderling D, Reyes-Frausto S

Language: English
References: 15
Page: 14-20
PDF size: 96.57 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To analyse the costs and the effectiveness of an intervention of home visits made by nurses to elderly people versus usual care given by the family medicine units. Material and Methods. A sample of 4 777 subjects aged 60 years and over covered by the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, IMSS) were screened. Those with a systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure level higher or equal than 160/90 mm Hg were randomly allocated to the intervention or control groups. The intervention consisted of visits at home by nurses who gave health and lifestyle advice to the participants. The economic evaluation was considered from a health services and patient perspective. Direct and indirect costs were calculated as incremental. Effectiveness was measured in terms of cost per millimetre of mercury reduced. Results. Three hundred and forty five participants were allocated to the intervention group and compared with 338 controls. At the end of the intervention period the difference in the mean change in systolic blood pressure was 3.31 mm Hg (95% CI 6.32, 0.29; p=0.03) comparing with the control group. In diastolic blood pressure the difference was 3.67 (95% CI 5.22, 2.12; p‹0.001). The total cost of the intervention was 101 901.66 pesos. The intervention cost per patient was 34.61 pesos (US$3.78), (CI 95% 34.44, 35.46). The cost-effectiveness ratios was 10.46 pesos (US$1.14) for systolic (CI 95% 129.31, 5.51) and 9.43 (US$1.03) for diastolic (CI 95% 19.90, 2.49). Conclusions. The reduction in blood pressure obtained may well justify the small incremental cost of the intervention.

REFERENCES

1. Secretaría de Salud. Boletín de Información Estadística, Recursos y Servicios. México, D.F.: SSA;1997.

2. Secretaría de Salud. Encuesta Nacional de Enfermedades Crónicas. México, D.F.: Dirección General de Epidemiología, 1996.

3. García-Peña C, Thorogood M, Armstrong B, Reyes S, Muñoz O. Pragmatic Randomised Trial of Home Visits by a Nurse to Elderly People with Hypertension in Mexico. Int J Epidemiol 2001.

4. García-Peña C, Thorogood M, Reyes S, Salmerón-Castro J, Durán C. The prevalence and Treatment of Hypertension in Elderly Population. Salud Publica Mex 2001;43:415-420.

5. Kaplan N. Cost Considerations in the drug treatment of the Mexican Institute of Social Security hypertension. Is older better? Pharmacoeconomics 1996;9:283-285.

6. Johannesson M. The cost effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden. Pharmacoeconomics 1995;7:242-250.

7. Edelson D, Weinstein M, Tosteson A, Willims L, Lee T, Goldman L. Longterm cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension. JAMA 1990;263:407-413.

8. Mancia G, Giannattasio C. Benefit and costs of anti-hypertensive treatment. Eur Heart J 1995;17 (Suppl A):25-28.

9. Wonderling D, McDErmott Ch, Buxton M, Kinmonth A, Pyke S, Thompson S. Costs and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular screening and intervention: the British Family Heart Study. BMJ 1996;312:1269-1273.

10. Wonderling D, Langham S, Buxton M, Normand Ch, McDermott CH. What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British Family Heart Studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ 1996;312:1274-1278.

11. Chaundhary M, Steams S. Estimating confidence intervals for costeffectivness ratios: An example from a randomized trial. Stat Med 1996;15:1447-1458.

12. Johannesson N, Johansson P. Is the evaluation of a QALY gained independent of age? Some empirical evidence. J Health Economics 1997;16:589-599.

13. Kennie D. Preventive Care for Elderly People. Londres: Cambridge University Press, 1993:310.

14. Kalache A. Health promotion. En: Ebrahim S, Kalache A, ed. Epidemiology in old age. Londres: Latimer Trend, 1996:156.

15. Lewando-Hundt G, Al Zaroo S (2000). Evaluation the dissemination of health promotion research. En: Thorogood M, Coombes Y. Evaluation Health Promotion. Practice and Methods. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 2000:151.