medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2003, Number S3

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2003; 45 (S3)

Early detection of cervical cancer with visual inspection methods: A summary of completed and on-going studies in India

Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw K, Rajkumar R, Shastri S, Wesley R, Basu P, Sharma R, Thara S, Budukh A, Parkin DM

Language: English
References: 26
Page: 309-407
PDF size: 102.10 Kb.


ABSTRACT

India is a high-risk country for cervical cancer which accounts a quarter (126 000 new cases, 71 000 deaths around 2 000) of the world burden. The age-standardized incidence rates range from 16-55 per 100 000 women in different regions with particularly high rates in rural areas. Control of cervical cancer by early detection and treatment is a priority of the National Cancer Control Programme of India. There are no organized cytology screening programmes in the country. The technical and financial constraints to organize cytology screening have encouraged the evaluation of visual inspection approaches as potential alternatives to cervical cytology in India. Four types of visual detection approaches for cervical neoplasia are investigated in India: a) naked eye inspection without acetic acid application, widely known as ‘downstaging’; b) naked eye inspection after application of 3-5% acetic acid (VIA); c) VIA using magnification devices (VIAM); d) visual inspection after the application of Lugol’s iodine (VILI). Downstaging has been shownto be poorly sensitive and specific to detect cervical neoplasia and is no longer considered as a suitable screening test for cervical cancer. VIA, VIAM and VILI are currently being investigated in multicentre cross-sectional studies (without verification bias), in which c ytology and HPV testing are also simultaneously evaluated, and the results of these investigations will be available in 2003. These studies will provide valuable information on the average, comparative test performances in detecting high-grade cervical cancer precursors and cancer. Results from pooled analysis of data from two completed studies indicated an approximate sensitivity of 93.4% and specificity of 85.1% for VIA to detect CIN 2 or worse lesions; the corresponding figures for cytology were 72.1% and 91.6%. The efficacy of VIA in reducing incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer and its cost-effectiveness is currently being investigated in two cluster randomized controlled intervention trials in India. One of these studies is a 4-arm trial addressing the comparative efficacy of VIA, cytology and primary screening with HPV DNA testing. This trial will provide valuable information on comparative detection rates of CIN 2-3 lesions by the middle of 2003. The expected outcomes from the Indian studies will contribute valuable information for guiding the development of public health policies on cervical cancer prevention in countries with different levels of socio-economic and health services development and open up new avenues of research.


REFERENCES

  1. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J, ed. Cancer incidence in five continents. IARC 1997;Scientific Publication No. 143 Vol. VII.

  2. Rajkumar R, Sankaranarayanan R, Esmi A, Jayaraman R, Cherian J, Parkin DM. Leads to cancer control based on cancer patterns in a rural population in South India. Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:433-439.

  3. Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R.Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:954-962.

  4. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. IARC Press, 2001; Version 1.0. IARC CancerBase No.5.

  5. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Cancer Control Programme of India. New Delhi: Government of India, 1982.

  6. Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology (ICMR). National workshop on control of cervical cancer-alternative strategies. New Delhi, India: 2001.

  7. Stjernsward J, Eddy D, Luthra U, Stanley K. Plotting a new course for cervical cancer screening in developing countries. World Health Forum 1987;8:42-45.

  8. Sehgal A, Singh V, Bhambhani S, Luthra UK. Screening for cervical cancer by direct inspection. Lancet 1991;338:282.

  9. Singh V, Sehgal A, Luthra UK. Screening for cervical cancer by direct inspection. Brit Med J 1992;304:534-535.

  10. Bharghava VL, Verma K, Sharma R, Batra S, Anandalakshmy PN. A Hospital-based study on the use of paramedical personnel for clinical down-staging of cancer cervix. Indian J Med Res 1993;98:65-68.

  11. Sujathan K, Kannan S, Pillai KR, Mathew A, Joseph M, Shyamalakumari B et al. Implications of gynaecological abnormalities in pre-selection criteria for cervical cancer screening: Preliminary evaluation of 3602 subjects in south India. Cytopathology 1995;6:75-87.

  12. Rao SR, Revathy S, Malvi SG, Taskar V, Rao RS. Pitfalls in the visual inspection of the cervix, as a method of downstaging cancer of the cervix in developing countries. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;28:659-665.

  13. Nene BM, Deshpande S, Jayant K, Budukh AM, Dale PS, Deshpande DA et al. Early detection of cervical cancer by visual inspection: A population-based study in rural India. Int J Cancer 1996;68:770-773.

  14. Wesley R, Sankaranarayanan R, Mathew B, Chandralekha B, Beegum AA, Amma NS et al. Evaluation of visual inspection as a screening test for cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1997;75: 436-440.

  15. Basu P, Sankaranarayanan R, Mandal R, Roy C, Das P, Choudhary D et al. Evaluation of downstaging in the detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India. Int J Cancer 2002;100:92-96.

  16. Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test Accuracy. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:680-689.

  17. Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and followup of cervical cytologic abnormalities: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:810-819.

  18. Sankaranarayanan R, Syamalakumari B, Wesley R, Thara Somanathan, Chandralekha B, Sreedevi Amma N et al. Visual inspection as a screening test for cervical cancer control in developing countries. In: Franco E, Monsonego J, ed. New developments in cervical cancer screening and prevention. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997:411-421.

  19. Ponten J, Adami HO, Bergstorm R, Dillner J, Friberg LG, Gustafsson L et al. Strategies for control of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 1995;60:1-26.

  20. Jayant K, Rao RS, Nene BM, Dale PS. Improved stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer awareness in a rural population. Int J Cancer 1995;63: 161-163.

  21. World Health Organization. National Cancer Control Programmes. Policies and managerial guidelines. Second Edition. Ginebra: 2002.

  22. Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Somanathan T, Dhakad N, Shyamalakumary B, Sreedevi Amma N et al. Performance of visual inspection after acetic acid application (VIA) in the detection of cervical cancer precursors. Cancer 1998;83:2150-2156.

  23. Sankaranarayanan R, Shyamalakumary B, Wesley R, Sreedevi Amma N, Parkin DM, Krishnan Nair M. Visual inspection with acetic acid in the early detection of cervical cancer and precursors. Int J Cancer 1999;80:161-163.

  24. Parashari A, Singh V, Seghal A, Satyanarayana L, Sodhani P, Gupta MM. Low-cost technology for screening uterine cervical cancer. Bull World Health Organ 2000;78:964-967.

  25. Denny L, Kuhn L, Pollack A, Wright TC Jr. Direct visual inspection for cervical cancer screening: An analysis of factors influencing test performance. Cancer 2002;94:1699-1707.

  26. Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R. A practical manual on visual screening for cervical neoplasia. IARC Internal Technical Manual. Lyon: IARC, 1999.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com