medigraphic.com
ISSN 2448-8909 (Print)

2008, Number 3

Next >>

Med Crit 2008; 22 (3)

The clinic research in Intensive Care Units

Díaz de LPMA, Briones GJC

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 122-123
PDF size: 43.08 Kb.


Text Extraction

No abstract


REFERENCES

  1. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwrible WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson S, Rickert T, Rubenfeld G on behalf of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICU end of life Peer Group. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States. Crit Care Med 2004;32:638-643.

  2. Kersten A, Milbrandt EB, Rahim MT, Watson RS, Clermont G, Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT. How big is critical care in the US? Crit Care Med 2003;31:A8.

  3. White J. Uses and abuses of long term medicare cost estimates. Health Aff (Millwood) 1999;18:63-79.

  4. Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich J Jr, for the Committee on Manpower for Pulmonary and Critical Care Societies (COMPACCS). Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA 2000;284:2762-2770.

  5. Brochard L. Searching for evidence: don’t forget the foundations. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:2109-2111.

  6. Luce JM. Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill subjects? Crit Care Med 2003;31:S153-S160.

  7. Truog RD, Robinson W, Randolph A, Morris A. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? N Engl J Med 1999;340:804-807.

  8. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1979.

  9. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000;283:2701-2711.

  10. Nuremberg Code. In: Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law. No. 10. Vol 2, Nuremberg, October 1946 – April 1949. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949.

  11. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, Revised. Ferney-Voltaire, France: World Medical Association, 2000.

  12. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 1987;317:141-145.

  13. Institute of Medicine. Responsible Research: a Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.

  14. Agrawal M, Emanuel EJ. Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies; reexamining the arguments and data. JAMA 2003;290:1075-1082.

  15. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 1987;17:20-24.

  16. Miller FG, Rosenstein DL. The therapeutic orientation to clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1383-1386.

  17. Grunberg SM, Cefalu WT. The integral role of clinical research in clinical care. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1386-1388.

  18. Halpern SD, Karlawish JHT, Berlin JA. The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA 2002;288:358-362.

  19. Steinbrook R. How best to ventilate? Trial design and patient safety in studies of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1393-1401.

  20. Steinbrook R. Trial design and patient safety – the debate continues. N Engl J Med 2003;349:629-630.

  21. Miller FG, Silverman HJ. The ethical relevance of the standard of care in the design of clinical trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:562-564.

  22. Silverman HJ, Miller FG. Control group selection in critical care randomized controlled trials evaluating interventional strategies: an ethical assessment. Crit Care Med 2004;32:852-857.

  23. Krishnan JA, Moore D, Robeson C, Rand CS, Fessler HE. A prospective, controlled trial of s protocol-based strategy to discontinue mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:673-678.

  24. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, Knox L, Pineo GF, Doig CJ, Laporta DP, Viner S, Passerini L, Devitt H et al, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003;348:5-14.

  25. Richard-PAC, Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N, Deye N, Combes A, Barnoud D, Boulain T, Lefort Y, Fartoukh M et al, for the French Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study Group. Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:2713-2720.

  26. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Rule (45 CFR 46). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects; notices and rules. 1991: 28003-28032.

  27. Slutsky AS, Lavery JV. Data safety and monitoring boards. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1143-1147.

  28. Ellenberg SS, Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Data monitoring committees in clinical trials: a practical perspective. Chichester, England: John Wiley; 2002.

  29. Freeman BD, Danner RL, Banks SM, Natanson C. Safeguarding patients in clinical trials with high mortality rates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:190-192.

  30. Steinbrook R. Protecting research subjects: the crisis at Johns Hopkins. N Engl J Med 2002;346:716-720.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com