medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2004, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2004; 27 (4)

Usefulness of the intrapleural anesthesia vs general anesthesia in pediatric heart surgery: Evaluation and management

Acevedo-Corona A, Álvarez-Rosales H, Molina-Méndez FJ, Gaytán-Fernández B, Hernández-Soria V, Domínguez-Castro RMP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 185-190
PDF size: 67.83 Kb.


Key words:

Intrapleural anesthesia, heart surgery, pediatrics.

ABSTRACT

Intrapleural anesthesia (IPA) is an easy technique; somatic and visceral anesthesia may be achieved by injecting local anesthetics in the intrapleural space. Nevertheless, the usefulness of intrapleural anesthesia in pediatric heart surgery has not been established. The goal of this study was describing and analyzing intrapleural anesthesia in pediatric heart surgery as a complementary intraoperative technique, and comparing it to conventional general anesthesia. Twenty patients were enrolled, with patent ductus arteriosus or aortic coarctation scheduled for posterolateral thoracotomy. Ten patients (Group I) underwent conventional general anesthesia and ten (Group II) underwent general anesthesia plus IPA. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t test, with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Results: Mean intraoperative fentanyl consumption was 19.82 mg/kg in Group I and 7.5 mg/kg in Group II (p < 0.0007). Consumption of anesthetic gases (sevofluorane) was less in Group II compared to Group I. Mean extubation time was 1,362.4 minutes in Group I and 612 minutes in Group II (p < 0.00004). There were no significant differences as to demographic features, intraoperative midazolam consumption, ICU stay and postoperative analgesics use. No complications were reported related to the use of IPA. Conclusion: IPA is an easy technique, with few complications, which allows using less intraoperative opioids and anesthetic gases and an earlier extubation.


REFERENCES

  1. Joseph DT. Anaesthetic implications of thoracoscopic surgery in children. Paed Anaesth 1999;9:103-110.

  2. Azad SC. Postoperative pain management in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2001;14:87-91.

  3. Murphy DF. Interpleural analgesia. Br. J. Anaesth. 1993;71:426-434.

  4. Stromskag KE, Hauge O, Steen PA. Distribution of local anesthetics injected into the interpleural space, studied by computarized tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990;34:323-326.

  5. McKenzie AG, Mathe S. Interpleural local anaesthesia: anatomical basis for mechanism of action. Br J Anaesth 1990;70:297-299.

  6. Vadeboncouer TR, Pelligrino DA, Riegler FX, Albrecht RF. Interpleural bupivacaine in the dog: distribution of effect and influence of injectate volume. Anesth Analg 1989:68:1-321.

  7. Gallart Ll, Gea J, Aguar MC, et al. Effects of interpleural bupivacaine on respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function. Anesthesiology 1995;83:48-55.

  8. Reber A, Scheidegger D. An alternative technique for interpleural analgesia. Anesthesiology 1998;88:553-554.

  9. McIlvaine WB. Intrapleural anaesthesia is useful for thoracic analgesia. Pro: intrapleural anesthesia is useful thoracic analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1993;71:426-434.

  10. Silomon M, Claus T, Huer H, Andreas L, Reinhard M, Molter G, et al. Interpleural analgesia does not influence posthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 2000;91:44-50.

  11. Scott PV. Interpleural regional analgesia: detection of the interpleural space by saline infusion. Br J Anaesth 1991;66:131-133.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2004;27