2008, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Cir Cir 2008; 76 (2)
Urological complications after kidney transplantation
Rojas-Manjarrez MA, Fernández-Díaz OF, Sandoval-Sandoval MJ, Valdespino-Mejía C, Monteón-Ramos F, González-Ojeda A
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 133-137
PDF size: 52.17 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Urological complications represent a common problem in kidney transplant surgery. The estimated incidence of these complications occurs in 3 to 30% of renal transplantation. Solving these complications may improve the renal graft survival and, consequently, patient outcome. The objective is to establish the prevalence of urological complications after renal transplantation.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 338 patients with kidney transplantations performed at the Transplant Unit of the Specialties Hospital of the Western Medical Center over a 6-year period. Data were obtained from the patients’ clinical files about the prevalence of urological complications and their management. Renal graft loss prevalence and mortality were reported.
Results: The global prevalence of urological complications was 5.92%. Onset time of all the complications occurred between 1 and 210 days. Diagnosis was established using clinical, laboratory and imaging methods. Endourological management with double-J catheter through cystoscopy was used as the first option of treatment in the majority of the patients having complete resolution in all cases. There was no graft loss or mortality in our patients.
Conclusions: The most common urological complication was the urinary fistulae located at the ureterovesical anastomosis. In comparison with other transplant centers worldwide, our prevalence of urological complications was similar.
REFERENCES
1. Bordes-Aznar J, Peña JC, Herrera-Acosta J, et al. Twenty-four-year experience in kidney transplantation at one single institution in Mexico City. Transplant Proc 1992;24:1794-1795.
2. Kekec Y, Tokyay R, Tavli S, Bilgin N, Haberal M. Urological complications in 884 consecutive transplants. Transplant Proc 1992;24:1870-1871.
3. Mahdavi-Zafarghani R, Taghavi R. Urological complications following renal transplantation: assessment in 500 recipients. Transplant Proc 2002;34:2109-2110.
4. Davari HR, Yarmohammadi H, Malekhosseini SA, et al. Urological complications in 980 consecutive patients with renal transplantation. Int J Urol 2006;13:1271-1276.
5. Guardiola-Mas A, Sánchez-Gascón F, Gimeno L, et al. Urological complications in renal transplantation. Study of 250 cases. Actas Urol Esp 2001;25:628-636.
6. Streeter EH, Little DM, Cranston DW, Morris PJ. The urological complications of renal transplantation: a series of 1535 patients BJU Int 2002;90:627-634.
7. Dalgic A, Boyvat F, Karakayali H, et al. Urologic complications in 1523 renal transplantations: The Baskent University experience. Transplant Proc 2006;38:543-547.
8. Kerkebe R, Bengió RG, Villarreal C, et al. Complicaciones urologicas mayores de trasplante renal en el Hospital Córdoba. Rev Chil Urol 2003;68:87-92.
9. Samhan M, Al-Mousawi M, Hayati H, Abdulhalim M, Nampoory MR. Urologic complications after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005;37:3075-3076.
10. Buterworth PC, Horsburgh T, Veitch PS, Bell PR, Nicholson ML. Urological complications in renal transplantation: impact of a change of technique. Br J Urol 1997;79:499-502.
11. Gonzalo-Rodríguez V, Rivero-Martínez MD, Trueba-Arguiñarena J, et al. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las complicaciones urológicas del transplante renal. Actas Urol Esp 2006;30:619-625.
12. Battaglia M, Ditonno P, Selvaggio O, et al. Double J stent with antireflux device in the prevention of short-term urological complications after cadaveric kidney transplantation: single-center prospective randomized study. Trans Proc 2005;37:2525-2526.
13. Bergmeijer JH, Nijman R, Kalkman E, et al. Stenting of the ureterovesical anastomosis in pediatric renal transplantation. Transpl Int 1990;3:146-148.
14. French CG, Acott PD, Crocker JF, Bitter-Suermann, Lawen JG. Extravesical ureteroneocystostomy with and without internalized ureteric stents in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2001;5:21-26.
15. Nicol DL, P’Ng K, Hardie DR, Wall DR, Hardie IR. Routine use of indwelling ureteral stents in renal transplantation. J Urol 1993;150:1375-1379.
16. Kumar A, Verma BS, Srivastava A, et al. Evaluation of the urological complications of living related renal transplantation at a single center during the last 10 years: impact of the double J stent. J Urol 2000;164:657-660.
17. Benoit G, Blanchet P, Mourkarzel M, et al. Surgical complications in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 1994;26:287-288.
18. Albala DM, Lawson JH. Recent clinical and investigational applications of fibrin sealant in selected surgical specialties. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:685-697.
19. Hong YM, Loughlin KR. The use of hemostatic agents and sealants in urology. J Urol 2006;176:2367-2374.
20. Shoskes DA, Hanbury D, Cranston D, Morris PJ. Urological complications in 1,000 consecutive renal transplant recipients. J Urol 1995;153:18-21.
21. Juaneda B, Alcaraz A, Bujons A, et al. Endourological management is better in early-onset ureteral stenosis in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005;37:3825-3827.
22. Alcaraz A, Bujons A, Pascual X, et al. Percutaneous management of transplant ureteral fistulae is feasible in selected cases. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:2111-2114.
23. Li Marzi V, Filocamo MT, Dattolo E, et al. The treatment of fistulae and ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005;37: 2516-2517.