2004, Number 2
Impact of the intrahospital pneumonia for P. aeruginosa in the ICU of Specialities Hospital “Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda” of the National Medical Center XXI Century
Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 54-58
PDF size: 94.69 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Demonstrate that the service where it happens the biggest number of intrahospital pneumonias for P. aeruginosa it is the ICU for the methodology that is used for their treatment, besides an incorrect indication of antibiotics; since the report of the microbiologic studies is not used that are made in these areas by the epidemiology services and infectology every month where they report the existent germs in these areas specifying its sensibility and resistance. Design: Is an study transverse and analytic. Place: ICU of the Hospital of Specialties “Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda” of the Center Medical National XXI Century. Patient: Sixty seven patients with intrahospital pneumonia for P. aeruginosa in the Hospital of Specialties “Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda” CMN SXXI in the period understood among January 1 from the 2002 to, December 31 the 2002. Results: Of the 67 studied patients, 26 (39%) they received treatment for which were resistant, with a mortality of 65%, 17 (25%) they received treatment for which were sensitive, with mortality of 11%, 5 patients (7%) they received both treatments for resistant and sensitive with a mortality of 20%. Finally 19 patients (29%) they received another treatment type to which they were not sensitive but neither resistant reporting a mortality of 31%. Conclusions: The service where is presented with more frequency the intrahospital pneumonia for P. aeruginosa is the ICU. The treatment for this germ was not the appropriate in most of the patients, and the antimicrobial of first instance was not the suitable one being based on the monthly epidemic study. On the other hand when that of the appropriate characteristics was used or the one reported in the patient’s cultivations with the high sensibility and without resistance this diminished the mortality for this illness.REFERENCES
Zanetti G, Bally F, Greub G, Garbino J, Kinge T, Lew D, Romand JA, Bille J, Aymon D, Stratchounski L, Krawczyk L, Rubinstein E, Schaller MD, Chiolero R, Glauser MP, Cometta A. Cefepime Study Group, Cefepime versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, evaluator-blind, prospective, randomized study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47(11):3442-7.
West M, Boulanger BR, Fogarty C, Tennenberg A, Wiesinger B, Oross M, Wu SC, Fowler C, Morgan N, Kahn JB. Levofloxacin compared with imipenem/cilastatin followed by ciprofloxacin in adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study. Clin Ther 2003;25(2):485-506.