medigraphic.com

2006, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hosp Jua Mex 2006; 73 (3)

Anatomical findings more common in lumbar disc herniation at Hospital Juarez de Mexico. SS

Huerta OVM, Torre GD, Pérez MJA, Miranda GD, Gómez LGS, Villaseñor JJ

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 91-95
PDF size: 194.75 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In the Hospital Juárez de México was made clinic and retrospective study from Janaury 1± 1999 to December 1± 2004. We evaluated 65 patients, 38 male and 27 female, with an edge of 37 years. The indication of surgical treatment was lumbago and lumbociatalgia that wasn’t be controled after six months of medical treatment or the patient presents a syndrome of equina tail. We exclude 15 patients, 9 because wasn´t return to the surgical evaluations and 6 present estenosis of the channel lumbar secondary to present/display facetaria artrosis or fibrosis secondary a previous surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Abramovitz JN, et al. Lumbar disc surgery: results of the prospective lumbar diskectomy study of the joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 1991; 29: 301-8.

  2. Barr LS. Low back and sciatic pain. JBJ Surg (Am) 1976; 33: 633-49.

  3. Caspar W, et al. The Caspar microsurgical diskectomy and comparison with a conventional standard. Advances in Neurological Surgery 1977; 4: 74-9.

  4. Frymover JW, et al. Lumbar disk surgery requiring second operation. Spine 1978; 3: 7-11.

  5. Goald HJ, et al. Microlumbar diskectomy: follow up of 147 patients. Spine 1978; 3: 183-5.

  6. Kahamovitz N, et al. Limited surgical diskectomy and microdiskectomy. Spine 1989; 14: 79-81.

  7. Knop BM, et al. Anatomic position of HNP predicts the outcome of lumbar diskectomy. J Spinal Disord 1996; 9: 246-50.

  8. Maroon JC, et al. Microlumbar diskectomy. Clin Neurosurg 1986; 33: 401-17.

  9. Naylon A. The late results of laminectomy for lumbar disk prolapse. JBJ Surg (Am) 1974; 56: 10-28.

  10. Nystrom B. Experience of microsurgical compared with conventional technique in lumbar disk operations. Acta Neurol Scand 1987; 76: 129-41.

  11. Armstrong JR. The causes of unsatisfactory results from the operative treatment of lumbar disk lesions. JBJ Surg (Br) 1951; 33: 45-55.

  12. Hanley EN, et al. The development of low back pain, after excision of a lumbar disk. JBJ Surg (Am) 1989; 71: 719-21.

  13. Kostunk J, et al. Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disk herniation. JBJ Surg (Am) 1986; 68: 386-91.

  14. Andrews DW, et al. Retrospective analysis of microsurgical and standard lumbar diskectomy. Spine 1990; 15: 329-55.

  15. Sari H, Akarirmak U, Karacan I, Akman H. Computed tomographic evaluation of lumbar spinal structures during traction. Physiother Theory Pract 2005; 21(1): 3-11.

  16. Rodriguez-Garcia J, Sanchez-Gastaldo A, Ibanez-Campos T, Vazquez-Sousa C, Cantador-Hornero M, Exposito-Tirado JA, Cayuela-Dominguez A, Echevarria-Ruiz de Vargas C. Related factors with the failed surgery of herniated lumbar disc. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2005; 16(6): 507-17.

  17. Capelle HH, Krauss JK. Recurrent sciatica due to periligamentous trapped epidural gas after spinal sequestrectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4(1): 75-7.

  18. Gerszten PC, Welch WC, King JT Jr. Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing nucleoplasty-based percutaneous discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006; 4(1): 36-42.

  19. Weiner BK, Dabbah M. Lateral lumbar disc herniations treated with a paraspinal approach: an independent assessment of longer-term outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18(6): 519-21.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com